sorry but everyone on death row was proven guilty by a jury,,,
We've released 156 of them because they didn't commit the crimes they were accused of.
So, no, a bad system.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
sorry but everyone on death row was proven guilty by a jury,,,
You often just repeat talking points without having put any actual thought into them. It's patently obvious
I find it difficult to imagine the degree of @sociopathy and depravity that it must take to think that murdering innocent children in cold blood, and putting the worst and deadliest of violent, hardened, convicted criminal to death, can be compared and lumped together in such a manner.
I think I probably represent the most extreme edge of opposition to abortion. (Though it does seem quite odd to me that my position ought to be the one considered the one that is “extreme”, given that it is the position most solidly rooted in common decency and common sense.) I consider it to be nothing less than the intentional killing of an innocent human being, and therefore something that should be absolutely illegal, and subject to the harshest of penalties up to and including the death penalty; except under conditions comparable to those under which homicide would otherwise be justifiable.
I don't think there's anyone more extremely opposed the the cold-blooded murder of innocent children than I am, and even I am not opposed to it under such extreme conditions as an ectopic pregnancy, where the child is almost certain to die anyway, and the mother is at great risk of serious harm or even death if the pregnancy is allowed to continue.
That said, I see no Constitutional justification for getting an abortion to kill a child that is expected to die on its own, anyway.
How do we measure the threshhold where I am allowed, with a loaded gun in my hand, to shoot someone else with it? I don't know that the line is always absolutely clear, but what is clear is that the taking of a human life is always a drastic and terrible act, that can only ever be allowed in a civilized society under extremely drastic and terrible conditions. In some circumstances, it may be necessary to leave it up to a jury whether a particular instance of homicide was on the right side or the wrong side of the line.
Abortion is no different, morally or ethically, than any other form of homicide, and should not be subject to different legal standards.
If a form of birth control allows conception, but then prevents the child thus created from being able to develop any further, then yes, that is homicide, and on that basis, should be illegal.
its a good system,,,its people that made mistakes,,,sorry but everyone on death row was proven guilty by a jury,,,
We've released 156 of them because they didn't commit the crimes they were accused of.
So, no, a bad system.
For me personally, no, it would never be ok to have a willful abortion.
We do that all over the world constantly. Illegally. Unconstitutionally. We're doing it here now over pandemic neglect. We allow our schools to become shooting galleries. All we argue over is who is expendable.
We do that all over the world constantly. Illegally. Unconstitutionally. We're doing it here now over pandemic neglect. We allow our schools to become shooting galleries. All we argue over is who is expendable.
And that makes abortion that much more tolerable for you?
It doesn't for me.
Fetuses aren't children.
What it makes tolerable is our slaughter across the globe for the interests of capital.
That is what our "lessor of two evils" paradigm is all about love.What it makes tolerable is our slaughter across the globe for the interests of capital.
Translation: Two wrongs make a right.
I read this article about a mother who found out in her second trimester that the fetus had a condition that was preventing its bones and brain to grow. The doctor told her that the baby would likely not survive the term of her pregnancy and there was a risk to her health so she decided to terminate. I’m curious about what the pro-lifers think about this. Should this be legal or illegal?
Laura Prepon Reveals Heartbreaking Decision She Made to Terminate Her Second Pregnancy — People
"I feel in order to have a real conversation about motherhood, you need to share truths and talk about what's really going on," the star tells PEOPLEapple.news
Don't involve yourself in one. Be different than the political predator class who hid the coming pandemic from the public until the substantial people had had a chance to serve themselves while sodomizing the 401K working and underclasses.I read this article about a mother who found out in her second trimester that the fetus had a condition that was preventing its bones and brain to grow. The doctor told her that the baby would likely not survive the term of her pregnancy and there was a risk to her health so she decided to terminate. I’m curious about what the pro-lifers think about this. Should this be legal or illegal?
Laura Prepon Reveals Heartbreaking Decision She Made to Terminate Her Second Pregnancy — People
"I feel in order to have a real conversation about motherhood, you need to share truths and talk about what's really going on," the star tells PEOPLEapple.news
And there was a risk to her health? Bull.
Besides that, I have read the stories of women who were told the exact same thing, that the baby would die. Then they had the baby, and it was fine.
My view is, no, murder is wrong.
Don't involve yourself in one. Be different than the political class who hid the coming pandemic from the public until the substantial people had had a chance to serve themselves while sodomizing the 401K working and underclasses.I read this article about a mother who found out in her second trimester that the fetus had a condition that was preventing its bones and brain to grow. The doctor told her that the baby would likely not survive the term of her pregnancy and there was a risk to her health so she decided to terminate. I’m curious about what the pro-lifers think about this. Should this be legal or illegal?
Laura Prepon Reveals Heartbreaking Decision She Made to Terminate Her Second Pregnancy — People
"I feel in order to have a real conversation about motherhood, you need to share truths and talk about what's really going on," the star tells PEOPLEapple.news
And there was a risk to her health? Bull.
Besides that, I have read the stories of women who were told the exact same thing, that the baby would die. Then they had the baby, and it was fine.
My view is, no, murder is wrong.
That said, I see no Constitutional justification for getting an abortion to kill a child that is expected to die on its own, anyway.
So what kind of a sick fuck would make a woman carry a doomed fetus to term to watch it die?
Oh, right, A "Christian".
That is what our "lessor of two evils" paradigm is all about love.What it makes tolerable is our slaughter across the globe for the interests of capital.
Translation: Two wrongs make a right.
Sure you do.That is what our "lessor of two evils" paradigm is all about love.What it makes tolerable is our slaughter across the globe for the interests of capital.
Translation: Two wrongs make a right.
Yeah. . .
I stopped reading about there.
I don't compromise my principles as you clearly do.