Iran's Answer to Trump's bombing

[Luckyone]

Lol, and we're supposed to listen to a bunch of radical clerics. No thanks. And you would still be stroking corn pop had he taken out irans nuclear facilities. You're a liberal hack. Nothing less, nothing more.

No, we do not have to listen to them.....................we just need to be ready to accept the consequences of our actions against them. The reality of life.

Why wait when Iran just announced it would not give up its nuclear ambitions?

Because not waiting two weeks removes all the OTHER possibilities of a deal being done, like what we originally had (and was working) and that Trump broke up, which in turn gave Iran the possibility of continuing to enrich Uranium without any checking from us.

 

[Luckyone]

Thank you, Mr. Equivocal. The only thing that you seem to be sure of is Orange Man Bad. Otherwise, your post is internally inconsistent as to logic and facts. Are you aware that "not building nukes" and "having nuclear weapon capability" are two different things? Further, your "gambling" metaphor is incomplete because you do not acknowledge the risk of not taking military action against Iran's nuclear program. Finally, your assertion that Iran was becoming "more likely to make a deal" before the US bombing has no factual basis whatsoever.

I know you will be disappointed if President Trump doesn't put boots on the ground in Iran, but that is your problem.

All I stated in the OP and that you seem to be ignoring is that waiting 2 weeks would have opened the door for other less invasive and provoking reprisals actions.

As far as my assertion made, it was factual given that this happened in the past:

AI Overview

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement reached in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) along with the European Union. The main goal was to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

If it happened in the past, it could happen again, especially since Israel was bombing them successfully and 3 of their big leaders were killed. That means that Iran was more likely to attempt a deal now than even back in 2015. They had more to lose now than then.

 

[Luckyone]

Thank you, Mr. Equivocal. The only thing that you seem to be sure of is Orange Man Bad. Otherwise, your post is internally inconsistent as to logic and facts. Are you aware that "not building nukes" and "having nuclear weapon capability" are two different things? Further, your "gambling" metaphor is incomplete because you do not acknowledge the risk of not taking military action against Iran's nuclear program. Finally, your assertion that Iran was becoming "more likely to make a deal" before the US bombing has no factual basis whatsoever.

I know you will be disappointed if President Trump doesn't put boots on the ground in Iran, but that is your problem.

Disappointed is not the word.

This is the word "worried about the consequences of rash actions"

 

[Invisibleflash]

Here is the Ayatollah's reply to Trump that came out 3 hours ago



Here is what Trump's chosen Intelligence Director said about Iran's nuclear bomb status

Tulsi said Iran not building nukes.​

Here is what Trump said about her statement:



Here is the man that Trump's believed about Iran being close to a nuclear bomb:



here are my thoughts on this:

The bombing of Iran is a gamble and gambling when president is a very dangerous thing to do because if you lose the gamble, the consequences can be huge and that is not something a president should ever do when the odds are not overwhelming in your favor. To begin with, his own National Intelligence advisor (Tulsi Gabbard) said that Iran was NOT on the verge of building a neutron bomb. As such, Trump followed what Netanyahu/Mossad said and yet they have been saying the same thing for 33 years and have been wrong every time.

This means that the bombing of Iran may not have been necessary at this time. Already, Israel had been successful is harming the leadership of Iran and weakening them, meaning they were now more likely to come to the table to discuss a deal.

The bombing of Iran and hoping that the show of force will cause them to cede and come to the table is ridiculous as the Ayatollah and Iran is the definition of insanity and they will not use common sense now and come to the table. They will return the bombing with more attacks but now those attacks will be on U.S. troops and that will bring a war. I though that Trump promised to be a peacekeeper but this action is the furthest thing from peacekeeping as it gets.

In addition, the Ayatollah is no dummy and I would not be surprised if he anticipated this happening and moved secretly their nuclear capability somewhere else, meaning the bombing may have been mostly a waste of time.

I truly do not know what the answer is but one thing I am sure of, this was a gamble on Trump's part and one that can bring serious consequences to everyone. I think that Trump should have waited and seen how Iran reacted to all the bombing from Israel and the death of several of their leaders and not get the U.S. involved now, especially because the information he had was against what our own intelligence people stated.

Trump acted with his balls and not his brains.

The faster Israel and the Nazi Zionist Jews are wiped out, the better. They are a scourge on the world. The USA / Israel violated international law, the UN Charter and the Treaty on the Non-Proliferation of Nuclear Weapons by attacking Iran. Once no one cares about laws and there are no penalties for violating them; it is a Mad Max world and the only thing that matters is might makes right.

The keyboard commandos say Iran should have negotiated and taken Trump's deal. Iran did negotiate for 60 days and were still going to negotiate when attacked by Israel. The Jews told Trump they want the 'Libyan option' for Iran. Trump's deal for Iran was, zero nuclear enrichment, give up all your missiles, change regimes and unconditional surrender.

Once Iran was disarmed, the USA could invade and put in their puppet. The USA could then shut off China's oil and use Iran as staging grounds to take down Russia. It would be akin to taking down Iraq for false weapons of mass destruction claims and then using Iraq as a staging grounds for taking down Iran...which is exactly what the USA has done. Once Russia was broken up, the USA could move on to toppling China.

That's the score, bub.

 

[Luckyone]

This is what is happening to most of the posters on this thread. It is incredible how rational thinking has disappeared.

Thinking with one's balls (instead of with the brain) is what incompetent people with big egos do.

Here is what he seeks and is being given

 

[imawhosure]

One problem you face, you ignorant idiot, is that you are not fighting me...........you are fighting data, statistics and facts.

For everything you supply, I can tear it down with those. All you have is words because you are never able to PROVE anything.

Laughing me off of this board is not something that scares me, given that 90% of this board are Trump cult members and this is the reality about cults that you cannot ignore

An apocalyptic cult, 900 dead: remembering the Jonestown massacre, 40 years on​

View attachment 1127434

View attachment 1127435

Also, you are a sock, lol.

Your statistics are faulty. Look at the sites you choose. You ARE an anti-American, and that is plain as day.

When Obysmal got Bin Laden, we cheered.........although your hero BIDEN tried to talk him out of it. I still remember the cheering in my area; everyone, both sides of the political spectrum.

NOW we have SUBVERSIVES like YOU who can not celebrate a USA win. If you aren't an offshore plant by a country that is adversarial to us, you ought to be!

And let us say that because of that attack, we get a terror attack on our soil. WHO in the FU** let them in to do it, SUBVERSIVE A**HOLE! Wasn't that Joe BITEME and your LEFTIST crew!

AND, who has been doing EVERYTHING in their power to stop America from throwing them all out? THAT WOULD be YOU LEFTISTS, you SUBVERSIVE PUNK!

 

[Thinker101]

These dumb asses forget, Iran has ballistic missiles to put those nukes on that can reach half the world. HELLO! If bat shit crazy Iran took out Boston with a nuke all these morons would be demanding to know why something wasn't done to prevent it.

Do they forget or just choose to ignore?

 

[Luckyone]

Also, you are a sock, lol.

Your statistics are faulty. Look at the sites you choose. You ARE an anti-American, and that is plain as day.

Let me ask you a question. Did you ever serve this nation in the military and your life was at risk? I did, so before you accuse me of being anti-American, you need to prove that you are more of a patriot than me.

When Obysmal got Bin Laden, we cheered.........although your hero BIDEN tried to talk him out of it. I still remember the cheering in my area; everyone, both sides of the political spectrum.

For your knowledge (which you seem yo be lacking), Ihave clearly stated on this board that I have never been a fan of Biden. I have also clearly stated here that I am not a political person. I evaluate people and that is what I do, and to me Trump is the worst. In addition, I am not alone in that thought as 154 expert historians have rated him the worst, as well.

NOW we have SUBVERSIVES like YOU who can not celebrate a USA win. If you aren't an offshore plant by a country that is adversarial to us, you ought to be!

The end result of this action is not known yet. Iran remains alive and able to do damage to us,

And let us say that because of that attack, we get a terror attack on our soil. WHO in the FU** let them in to do it, SUBVERSIVE A**HOLE! Wasn't that Joe BITEME and your LEFTIST crew!

Who allowed 9/11 to happen?

AND, who has been doing EVERYTHING in their power to stop America from throwing them all out? THAT WOULD be YOU LEFTISTS, you SUBVERSIVE PUNK!

Doing things incompetently always ends up bringing consequences and bad results! You didn't know that, you Rightist ignorant idiot!

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

imawhosure is a draft dodger stolen valor dweeb.

 

[blackhawk]

Sure, the mindset of Iran's leadership has not changed since 1979 the names and faces have but not the mindset, but another two weeks and they would have seen the light.

 

[Luckyone]

Sure, the mindset of Iran's leadership has not changed since 1979 the names and faces have but not the mindset, but another two weeks and they would have seen the light.

AI Overview

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement reached in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) along with the European Union. The main goal was to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

If it happened in the past, it could happen again, especially since Israel was bombing them successfully and 3 of their big leaders were killed. That means that Iran was more likely to attempt a deal now than even back in 2015. They had more to lose now than then.

 

[Billiejeens]

Here is the Ayatollah's reply to Trump that came out 3 hours ago



Here is what Trump's chosen Intelligence Director said about Iran's nuclear bomb status

Tulsi said Iran not building nukes.​

Here is what Trump said about her statement:



Here is the man that Trump's believed about Iran being close to a nuclear bomb:



here are my thoughts on this:

The bombing of Iran is a gamble and gambling when president is a very dangerous thing to do because if you lose the gamble, the consequences can be huge and that is not something a president should ever do when the odds are not overwhelming in your favor. To begin with, his own National Intelligence advisor (Tulsi Gabbard) said that Iran was NOT on the verge of building a neutron bomb. As such, Trump followed what Netanyahu/Mossad said and yet they have been saying the same thing for 33 years and have been wrong every time.

This means that the bombing of Iran may not have been necessary at this time. Already, Israel had been successful is harming the leadership of Iran and weakening them, meaning they were now more likely to come to the table to discuss a deal.

The bombing of Iran and hoping that the show of force will cause them to cede and come to the table is ridiculous as the Ayatollah and Iran is the definition of insanity and they will not use common sense now and come to the table. They will return the bombing with more attacks but now those attacks will be on U.S. troops and that will bring a war. I though that Trump promised to be a peacekeeper but this action is the furthest thing from peacekeeping as it gets.

In addition, the Ayatollah is no dummy and I would not be surprised if he anticipated this happening and moved secretly their nuclear capability somewhere else, meaning the bombing may have been mostly a waste of time.

I truly do not know what the answer is but one thing I am sure of, this was a gamble on Trump's part and one that can bring serious consequences to everyone. I think that Trump should have waited and seen how Iran reacted to all the bombing from Israel and the death of several of their leaders and not get the U.S. involved now, especially because the information he had was against what our own intelligence people stated.

Trump acted with his balls and not his brains.

Not what Tulsi said.
No need to read farther.

 

[Billiejeens]

Just the opposite. I am hanging a U.S. flag at my home in support of rational thinking presidents that will not take us to war unnecessarily.

So now you love Trump then.

 

[blackhawk]

AI Overview

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement reached in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) along with the European Union. The main goal was to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

If it happened in the past, it could happen again, especially since Israel was bombing them successfully and 3 of their big leaders were killed. That means that Iran was more likely to attempt a deal now than even back in 2015. They had more to lose now than then.

Iran would do the same thing they have done for decades delay, stall, drag out negotiations wait for the world to tire of it and move on as it inevitable does and go back to doing what they want it's unrealistic to think that would change now but if some wish to believe this time would be different so be it.

 

[John Edgar Slow Horses]

Sure, the mindset of Iran's leadership has not changed since 1979 the names and faces have but not the mindset, but another two weeks and they would have seen the light.

You have not been to Iran much less lived there.

Two weeks would have changed nothing. I despise Trump, as all know here. But he was right to play them for fools and then knifed them in the back. It's what they would have done, and I guarantee you Muslim mind will respect and fear him now.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

Just the opposite. I am hanging a U.S. flag at my home in support of rational thinking presidents that will not take us to war unnecessarily.

Well then salute that flag and thank Trump for preventing that war for at least 20 years if not forever. Iran is no longer an international threat for nuclear war.

 

[Leo123]

Here is the Ayatollah's reply to Trump that came out 3 hours ago



Here is what Trump's chosen Intelligence Director said about Iran's nuclear bomb status

Tulsi said Iran not building nukes.​

Here is what Trump said about her statement:



Here is the man that Trump's believed about Iran being close to a nuclear bomb:



here are my thoughts on this:

The bombing of Iran is a gamble and gambling when president is a very dangerous thing to do because if you lose the gamble, the consequences can be huge and that is not something a president should ever do when the odds are not overwhelming in your favor. To begin with, his own National Intelligence advisor (Tulsi Gabbard) said that Iran was NOT on the verge of building a neutron bomb. As such, Trump followed what Netanyahu/Mossad said and yet they have been saying the same thing for 33 years and have been wrong every time.

This means that the bombing of Iran may not have been necessary at this time. Already, Israel had been successful is harming the leadership of Iran and weakening them, meaning they were now more likely to come to the table to discuss a deal.

The bombing of Iran and hoping that the show of force will cause them to cede and come to the table is ridiculous as the Ayatollah and Iran is the definition of insanity and they will not use common sense now and come to the table. They will return the bombing with more attacks but now those attacks will be on U.S. troops and that will bring a war. I though that Trump promised to be a peacekeeper but this action is the furthest thing from peacekeeping as it gets.

In addition, the Ayatollah is no dummy and I would not be surprised if he anticipated this happening and moved secretly their nuclear capability somewhere else, meaning the bombing may have been mostly a waste of time.

I truly do not know what the answer is but one thing I am sure of, this was a gamble on Trump's part and one that can bring serious consequences to everyone. I think that Trump should have waited and seen how Iran reacted to all the bombing from Israel and the death of several of their leaders and not get the U.S. involved now, especially because the information he had was against what our own intelligence people stated.

Trump acted with his balls and not his brains.

We want to KILL the Ayatollah, screw coming to 'the table.' The only table he's be on is the cooling board for cadavers.

 

[Luckyone]

Iran would do the same thing they have done for decades delay, stall, drag out negotiations wait for the world to tire of it and move on as it inevitable does and go back to doing what they want it's unrealistic to think that would change now but if some wish to believe this time would be different so be it.

AI Overview

The Joint Comprehensive Plan of Action (JCPOA), also known as the Iran nuclear deal, was an agreement reached in 2015 between Iran and the P5+1 (China, France, Germany, Russia, the United Kingdom, and the United States) along with the European Union. The main goal was to limit Iran's nuclear program in exchange for sanctions relief.

If it happened in the past, it could happen again, especially since Israel was bombing them successfully and 3 of their big leaders were killed. That means that Iran was more likely to attempt a deal now than even back in 2015. They had more to lose now than then.

 

[Ropey]

Whole lotta Allahu's going around here.

No Akhbars.

 

[Missourian]

Courtesy of the 509th Bomb Wing, Whiteman Air Force Base, Missouri.