‘Impeachable whatever’: GOP floats impeaching Biden for ... something

[struth]

If it were, Barr would have indicted them.

huh? Barr isn't a Grand Jury, let alone the AG.

 

[struth]

Shokin wasnt doing any investigating at all. If Biden want that, he would have just let Shokin sit in that position instead of ousting.

Yes he was.....https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden’s son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.

There’s just one problem.

Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

 

[BlindBoo]

huh? Barr isn't a Grand Jury, let alone the AG.

He was when Benedict Donald was making those unfounded allegations, though wasn't he?

 

[struth]

He was when Benedict Donald was making those unfounded allegations, though wasn't he?

what unfounded allegations?

 

[BlindBoo]

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt

The prosecutor was fired. But not before Joe left that day.

But you've been conditioned like Pavlov's dogs to believe it's all about Biden, not our bipartisan policy, or the EU, or the IMF. Saul Biden.

Those Neo-GOP conditioners at Faux, know their stuff, I'll give them that!

 

[elektra]

If it were, Barr would have indicted them.

Life long politicians, life long bureaucrates do not bite the hand that feeds them

 

[miketx]

So little time, so many lying leftist shit stains.

 

[struth]

The prosecutor was fired. But not before Joe left that day.

But you've been conditioned like Pavlov's dogs to believe it's all about Biden, not our bipartisan policy, or the EU, or the IMF. Saul Biden.

Those Neo-GOP conditioners at Faux, know there stuff, I'll give them that!

You claimed he wasn't investigating his son's corrupt company...he was. That link wasn't to Fox.

 

[miketx]

The prosecutor was fired. But not before Joe left that day.

But you've been conditioned like Pavlov's dogs to believe it's all about Biden, not our bipartisan policy, or the EU, or the IMF. Saul Biden.

Those Neo-GOP conditioners at Faux, know there stuff, I'll give them that!

No it's more like your vs you're. You know, knowing your shit vs knowing you're shit. The later suits you and the rest.

 

[BlindBoo]

what unfounded allegations?

Here's dumb as a stump Trump on that clip. He used the same conditioning clip btw. "He said, 'I’m not going to give billions of dollars to Ukraine unless they remove this prosecutor.' And they removed the prosecutor supposedly in one hour," Trump claimed, referring to Biden. "And the prosecutor was prosecuting the company of the son and the son. He just shouldn’t have said that. Now, as far as my conversation, it was perfect. It was a perfect conversation."

 

[struth]

Here's dumb as a stump Trump on that clip. He used the same conditioning clip btw. "He said, 'I’m not going to give billions of dollars to Ukraine unless they remove this prosecutor.' And they removed the prosecutor supposedly in one hour," Trump claimed, referring to Biden. "And the prosecutor was prosecuting the company of the son and the son. He just shouldn’t have said that. Now, as far as my conversation, it was perfect. It was a perfect conversation."

how is that unfounded? I literally just posted a link showing that Xiden in fact attempted to withold millions in funds if the prosecutor that was investigating his son's corrupt company wasn't fired.

That's in fact founded.

Yes he was.....https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden’s son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.

There’s just one problem.

Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

 

[BlindBoo]

Life long politicians, life long bureaucrates do not bite the hand that feeds them

Barr had just rescued the damsel Donnie from the distress of the Mueller Report with his expert mis-characterization of it. But he wasn't going to break the law when there was nothing there.

 

[BlindBoo]

how is that unfounded? I literally just posted a link showing that Xiden in fact attempted to withold millions in funds if the prosecutor that was investigating his son's corrupt company wasn't fired.

That's in fact founded.

Yes he was.....https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/

He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden’s son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.

There’s just one problem.

Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.

And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

The founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.

 

[struth]

The founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.

hahaha yes, he was under investigation for how he ran a corrupt company....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_Zlochevsky

In 2012, Viktor Pshonka,[a] the Ukrainian prosecutor general, began investigating Burisma Holdings owner, Zlochevsky, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption during 2010–2012.[15][16]

In April 2014 Zlochevsky named Hunter Biden, son of then U. S. Vice President Joe Biden, to Burisma’s board as a director of Burisma, where he was said to have earned over $80,000 monthly.[17] Joe Biden had been made the point man on Ukraine after February 2014, when the pro-Russian president, Viktor Yanukovych, was ousted and fled. Then U. S. President Barack Obama's administration was prepared to work with the new government, a position shared with European governments and institutions, such as the World Bank and the International Monetary Fund. But they were all concerned about Ukraine's corruption, which had plagued the country ever since it gained independence in the 1991 breakup of the Soviet Union. Joe Biden became a frequent visitor to Ukraine. By his own count, Biden said he went there about a dozen times from early 2014 through early 2016.[18]


So just to recap....1) he was investigating it....you were wrong on that 2) Xiden did threaten to withhold millions in aid if he wasn't fired 3) there was nothing unfounded about Trump accusation.

 

[BlindBoo]

So just to recap....1) he was investigating it.

Here you are debunking yourself

"the Ukrainian prosecutor general, began investigating Burisma Holdings owner, Zlochevsky, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption during 2010–2012

You're welcome.

 

[miketx]

Barr had just rescued the damsel Donnie from the distress of the Mueller Report with his expert mis-characterization of it. But he wasn't going to break the law when there was nothing there.

How many times a day do get the TV enema?

 

[struth]

Here you are debunking yourself

"the Ukrainian prosecutor general, began investigating Burisma Holdings owner, Zlochevsky, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption during 2010–2012

You're welcome.

how did that debunk me? hahahah it literally shows he was under investigation


And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.

 

[Ray From Cleveland]

The founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.

That's not what he says.

 

[BlindBoo]

How many times a day do get the TV enema?

 

[Cellblock2429]

“Republicans have been cuing up a potential impeachment of President Biden if they take back control of Congress in the midterm elections.

Now they just need to figure out what they might actually impeach him for.”

MSN

Impeachment as a partisan weapon.

And needless to say, Republicans will make the same claim with regard to both times Trump was impeached.

/——-/ How about Joe promoting traitors in the military?