huh? Barr isn't a Grand Jury, let alone the AG.If it were, Barr would have indicted them.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
huh? Barr isn't a Grand Jury, let alone the AG.If it were, Barr would have indicted them.
Yes he was.....https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/Shokin wasnt doing any investigating at all. If Biden want that, he would have just let Shokin sit in that position instead of ousting.
He was when Benedict Donald was making those unfounded allegations, though wasn't he?huh? Barr isn't a Grand Jury, let alone the AG.
what unfounded allegations?He was when Benedict Donald was making those unfounded allegations, though wasn't he?
He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt
Life long politicians, life long bureaucrates do not bite the hand that feeds themIf it were, Barr would have indicted them.
You claimed he wasn't investigating his son's corrupt company...he was. That link wasn't to Fox.The prosecutor was fired. But not before Joe left that day.
But you've been conditioned like Pavlov's dogs to believe it's all about Biden, not our bipartisan policy, or the EU, or the IMF. Saul Biden.
Those Neo-GOP conditioners at Faux, know there stuff, I'll give them that!
No it's more like your vs you're. You know, knowing your shit vs knowing you're shit. The later suits you and the rest.The prosecutor was fired. But not before Joe left that day.
But you've been conditioned like Pavlov's dogs to believe it's all about Biden, not our bipartisan policy, or the EU, or the IMF. Saul Biden.
Those Neo-GOP conditioners at Faux, know there stuff, I'll give them that!
Here's dumb as a stump Trump on that clip. He used the same conditioning clip btw. "He said, 'I’m not going to give billions of dollars to Ukraine unless they remove this prosecutor.' And they removed the prosecutor supposedly in one hour," Trump claimed, referring to Biden. "And the prosecutor was prosecuting the company of the son and the son. He just shouldn’t have said that. Now, as far as my conversation, it was perfect. It was a perfect conversation."what unfounded allegations?
how is that unfounded? I literally just posted a link showing that Xiden in fact attempted to withold millions in funds if the prosecutor that was investigating his son's corrupt company wasn't fired.Here's dumb as a stump Trump on that clip. He used the same conditioning clip btw. "He said, 'I’m not going to give billions of dollars to Ukraine unless they remove this prosecutor.' And they removed the prosecutor supposedly in one hour," Trump claimed, referring to Biden. "And the prosecutor was prosecuting the company of the son and the son. He just shouldn’t have said that. Now, as far as my conversation, it was perfect. It was a perfect conversation."
Barr had just rescued the damsel Donnie from the distress of the Mueller Report with his expert mis-characterization of it. But he wasn't going to break the law when there was nothing there.Life long politicians, life long bureaucrates do not bite the hand that feeds them
The founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.how is that unfounded? I literally just posted a link showing that Xiden in fact attempted to withold millions in funds if the prosecutor that was investigating his son's corrupt company wasn't fired.
That's in fact founded.
Yes he was.....https://thehill.com/opinion/campaign/463307-solomon-these-once-secret-memos-cast-doubt-on-joe-bidens-ukraine-story/
He insists that, in spring 2016, he strong-armed Ukraine to fire its chief prosecutor solely because Biden believed that official was corrupt and inept, not because the Ukrainian was investigating a natural gas company, Burisma Holdings, that hired Biden’s son, Hunter, into a lucrative job.
There’s just one problem.
Hundreds of pages of never-released memos and documents — many from inside the American team helping Burisma to stave off its legal troubles — conflict with Biden’s narrative.
And they raise the troubling prospect that U.S. officials may have painted a false picture in Ukraine that helped ease Burisma’s legal troubles and stop prosecutors’ plans to interview Hunter Biden during the 2016 U.S. presidential election.
hahaha yes, he was under investigation for how he ran a corrupt company....https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Mykola_ZlochevskyThe founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.
Here you are debunking yourselfSo just to recap....1) he was investigating it.
How many times a day do get the TV enema?Barr had just rescued the damsel Donnie from the distress of the Mueller Report with his expert mis-characterization of it. But he wasn't going to break the law when there was nothing there.
how did that debunk me? hahahah it literally shows he was under investigationHere you are debunking yourself
"the Ukrainian prosecutor general, began investigating Burisma Holdings owner, Zlochevsky, over allegations of money laundering, tax evasion, and corruption during 2010–2012
You're welcome.
The founder of the Company had been under investigation for a number of years. Not the company and not Hunter Biden. You have to ignore that fact to accept the conflation. The Neo-GOP Conditioners rely on the flock to ignore it.
/——-/ How about Joe promoting traitors in the military?“Republicans have been cuing up a potential impeachment of President Biden if they take back control of Congress in the midterm elections.
Now they just need to figure out what they might actually impeach him for.”
Impeachment as a partisan weapon.
And needless to say, Republicans will make the same claim with regard to both times Trump was impeached.