- Thread starter
- #141
Fair enough.
So then no hard feelings?
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Fair enough.
You make no sense as you pick and choose to push off your own version of legalism and it is obvious as you claim "I am right" while trying to trash something you obviously do not understand.So Christianity to you is just make up anything at all lest you're a Pharisee?
Strawmen, strawmen everywhere!
No strawmen, just your running away from answering. Asking a QUESTION cannot make a strawman ARGUMENT. But I understand your reluctance.
No strawmen, just your running away from answering. Asking a QUESTION cannot make a strawman ARGUMENT. But I understand your reluctance.
So then no hard feelings?
Clyde, you write a good post but where is there any private interpretation? Private interpretation implies an interpretation that conflicts with the word in the Bible--- how has that happened here?
And if you think writing a religious themed fiction account for kids to introduce them to and attract them to God is the work of Satan (as some have implied here), then holy crap, boy howdy, you better get busy.
View attachment 628419
View attachment 628420View attachment 628423View attachment 628424
View attachment 628425
View attachment 628427
View attachment 628428
Oh, the horror-- Better contact these publishers quick and tell them THERE SHALL BE NO DISCUSSION OF GOD EXCEPT FOR READING IT VERBATIM OUT OF THE BIBLE.
How? Specifics. What is the rock god if not a contemporary person whom God is working through?She is not telling a story of God working through people. She is reinventing God.
Really? Can you?Anyone can do that.
What warnings? Sue, you seem to be drawing conclusions from assumptions that to me seem pretty unjustified. BTW Sue, using the term 'believer' implies blind faith. I do not live by blind faith or "beliefs" but actual direct experience. I'll take that any day over mere belief.But I have a hard time believing that a Believer would do that even after understanding the warnings.
FJB , here's one of the reasons why I think portraying God as a rock and roll dude will inevitably receive at least some negative feedback.
Even though I don't think all rock music is the same... as a genre, rock n roll is known for being about rebellion. That's why a lot of rock stars are known for living crazy hedonistic lifestyles (sex, drugs, alcohol, recklessness etc, etc) Also, especially when it comes to metal or harder rock, a lot of them intentionally portray themselves as being on the "dark side." I mean, it is undeniable that a lot of them use blatantly satanic imagery on their album covers, their stage presence, etc.
So it's associated with all that stuff.... even if not all rock music is like that. But as I said earlier, my main point was that the bible says to stay away from worldliness. And I think portraying God as a rock and roll guy goes against those commands to not be like the world or love the things of this world.
Not to open up a whole new can of worms, but you do know who the bible says is the lowercase "god of this world", right?
To the extent that blasphemy involves speaking sacrilegiously about God, then it turns on what sacrilege means. Apparently it means a violation or misuse of that which is sacred. So, to analogize Jesus to a modern day rock star could be blasphemy IF it is somehow a misuse or violation of the Name of (or the “Being” of) Jesus.
I don’t think your analogy qualifies. If it did, then I suppose so does Godspell and Jesus Christ Superstar.
The other problem is I think is that for some strange reason people cannot seem to picture God actually enjoying Himself and having fun and I don't know really why
How? Specifics. What is the rock god if not a contemporary person whom God is working through?
Really? Can you?
What warnings? Sue, you seem to be drawing conclusions from assumptions that to me seem pretty unjustified. BTW Sue, using the term 'believer' implies blind faith. I do not live by blind faith or "beliefs" but actual direct experience. I'll take that any day over mere belief.
"direct experience"
That was worth a chuckle for real
"direct experience"
That was worth a chuckle for real
There is no logic or reason to the statement, "........no quality or activity exists in the finite quanity in the temporal world without first existing in unlimited quantity in the eternal kingdom of God." Men reason and commit acts of sin constantly, it even became so bad that God was made sorry that He ever created man on earth........and decided to wipe out the entire concept of humanity from the earth (Genesis 6:6) Its called FREE WILL. Its man that decides to be righteous or unrighteous, thus not EVERY ACTIVITY can exist in the eternal kingdom of God.Good point. Most people have this picture that God is somehow this old, stoic, bearded figure that just sits in heaven throwing thunderbolts and pestilence at people-- no doubt from the thinking and world men lived in 2000 years ago. Folks should realize that no quality or activity exists in finite quantity in the temporal word without first existing in unlimited quantity in the eternal kingdom of God. Before a thing can happen here in the material world, it must first exist in the plane of ideas-- before a chair can exist, first the IDEA of a chair must exist! Put simply, there is no limit to the number of activities that God can do all at the same time, God is the supreme dancer, God is the supreme musician, God is the supreme artisan. God is just as much at home playing the role of a peasant as he is a king.
There is no logic or reason to the statement, "........no quality or activity exists in the finite quanity in the temporal world without first existing in unlimited quantity in the eternal kingdom of God." Men reason and commit acts of sin constantly, it even became so bad that God was made sorry that He ever created man on earth........and decided to wipe out the entire concept of humanity from the earth (Genesis 6:6) Its called FREE WILL. Its man that decides to be righteous or unrighteous, thus not EVERY ACTIVITY can exist in the eternal kingdom of God.
God cannot look upon sin, thus sin can never exist in his abode of Heaven. (Isa. 1:15-17, 59:1-2) If God cannot look upon you, you have no place in Heaven.
No dummy...........I said there is no reason or logic TO YOUR STATEMENT.........its based upon idiocy. Sin cannot exist in Heaven. Sin is a concept of physical reality and could never exist within the Super (superior) Natural (superior to nature) realm of HEAVEN.View attachment 629620
LOOK, Hippocrates, are you remotely aware of tripping over your own words? For you claim that reason is an act of man, then you say that there is no logic or reason to the nature of the astral plane (heaven) as if it were all meant to be added up by mere mortals by reason!
Do you ever get tired of bloviating the same old holier than thou stinky crap that the earth shall open wide and smite all with brimstone who don't fall into line with your brand of puritanical bigotry?