- Oct 20, 2013
- 55,844
- 17,776
- 2,250
I'm just as opposed to the murdering of babies and selling body parts as anyone, as well as most everything Democrats do. Now turning to the subject matter of my post. If the fawns are still dependent on their mother's milk, how could fawns be nourished without their mother's milk ? Some substitute would need to be provided. How healthy (or unhealthy) would that be for the fawn ?The fawns used to be taken in and raised by locals in the area and they would leave when grown and return with their families for a visit. It was a blessed sight to see until the Democrats made laws making it a felony to feed an abandoned fawn or take it in and nurture it to full age. The law is no one can feed them or rescue them. They must be left to die. Blame your own Democrat party for that law. It's a wicked thing to do but they already have turned murdering babies and selling their body parts into a business so we should not be shocked to learn they would do it to Bambi.
Not that I'm in any habit of supporting Democrats, but from what I see here, I'm wondering if they didn't pass that law to keep you guys from going out and blowing their mothers away. Frankly, whether anybody cares for the fawns or not (and I'm not assured they do, with or without that law), I'd say going out and killing deer is just flat-out murder of one of God's creature's, a living thing that feels pain, probably suffers when shot, may be just wounded, and run off into the woods, to die a slow painful death.
I've never been a hunter, but I was a fisherman for decades, and I always felt uncomfortable about hurting the fish and killing them, even when their offspring was not an issue. I don't fish any more, and I feel a lot better about it now.