Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Hahaha, all of a sudden we have all these legal experts here!!! Did you get a line from Hannity and now you think you can be a law professor?! That’s sweet.False. No such thing has ever been laid out.
Your mistake is obvious.
You accept highly conditional statement spewed by the insidious persecutors in their Bill of Particulars as the People’s “position.” It isn’t because they aren’t bound to it.
And you are utterly unable to point a fucking thing they have bound themselves to as to that fictional and unstated “other” crime.
Deny all you want. It’s not hard to copy and paste and lay it out again,,, Bragg listed three "other" crimes that Trump allegedly intended to commit:
His bias and dishonesty in the very subject matter about which he testified at trial was exposed. He did terribly.Cohen did exceptionally well in testimony.
The defense is smarter than you or your biased advice.Defense, if it is smart, will not put on witnesses, will request a directed verdict (that will be denied), and rest its case.
Again you are talking about a procedural thing that can be brought up in court or appeal. But as far as understanding what the charges are, like what was asked in the OP… they have been laid out.No. He did not he specifically qualifies his crap by using the word “may.”
You can attempt to ignore that fact: but the fact doesn’t go away just because you choose to be dishonest.
Bragg hasn’t yet declared which one he is relying on. Or is he relying on more than one? If more than one, then how will we know if the jurors are unanimous in rendering a guilty verdict? If not unanimous, then any such conviction denies the accused of a fair trial and due process.
lol! Yes, I believe that Trump often signed checks in his own handwriting. That’s not illegal, is it?It’s wiesenbergs handwriting. Trumps CFO who is now in jail for all the shady biz dealings they do. Trumps handwriting is on the signed checks
I actually expected better from the prosecution on that point. I guess I should have known. I thought that they would at least try to present some evidence of the so-called another crime, but it seems that the accusation itself once again is the only evidence.False. No such thing has ever been laid out.
Your mistake is obvious.
You accept highly conditional statement spewed by the insidious persecutors in their Bill of Particulars as the People’s “position.” It isn’t because they aren’t bound to it.
And you are utterly unable to point a fucking thing they have bound themselves to as to that fictional and unstated “other” crime.
All that, according to Honest Mikey, right?Not true, I showed you the math. Are you dumb or just playing dumb?
$130k grossed up for taxes to $260k plus a $60 bonus = $320k for stormy payback
The remainder is $50k grossed up to $100k for a corp started to prop up poll numbers.
We all know Trump needs to brag about poll numbers. And if he can’t he just calls the polls fake, such intelligence from these people
Depends on what the checks are forlol! Yes, I believe that Trump often signed checks in his own handwriting. That’s not illegal, is it?
Don’t really need Mikey’s word in the matter… it’s backed up according to a plan written by Trumps CFO and checks written by DonnieAll that, according to Honest Mikey, right?
NDA payoff - not illegal. Additional attorney fees - not illegal.Depends on what the checks are for
Paying and extra $130k plus a $60k bonus so that Trump could avoid writing the check himself and disclosing it during an election is not a legal fee. It is a reimbursement and in this case an accused crimelol! Yes, I believe that Trump often signed checks in his own handwriting. That’s not illegal, is it?
I actually expected better from the prosecution on that point. I guess I should have known. I thought that they would at least try to present some evidence of the so-called another crime, but it seems that the accusation itself once again is the only evidence.
All that, according to Honest Mikey, right?
If he happens to be telling the truth, this time, all of that could still fairly be called legal fees. Trump was under no obligation to give details of every little thing his lawyer did with the legal fees that he paid him.
Much more likely though is that the money was for reimbursement of the 130 K plus much more for legal fees. There’s not that much room on a check stub.
Why would nondisclosure agreements be legal if you were required to publish the fact that you paid someone for a nondisclosure agreement? That would defeat the purpose of the agreement.
Keep in mind, that, in all of that, Trump was following the advice of his lawyer. The one who is now trying to prosecute him for following that advice. Cohen was very insistent that “I got this.”
You Dems pick strange heroes.
Irrelevant sealioning.NDA payoff - not illegal. Additional attorney fees - not illegal.
Then why did he testify?Don’t really need Mikey’s word in the matter…
A plan for nothing illegal.it’s backed up according to a plan written by Trumps CFO and checks written by Donnie
Wrong.Again you are talking about a procedural thing that can be brought up in court or appeal. But as far as understanding what the charges are, like what was asked in the OP… they have been laid out.
Trump followed the advice of his attorney and had no reason to think it was a crime - which it wasn’t.Paying and extra $130k plus a $60k bonus so that Trump could avoid writing the check himself and disclosing it during an election is not a legal fee. It is a reimbursement and in this case an accused crime
Another pathetic lieTrump followed the advice of his attorney
No evidence shows any such thing except maybe from perjury boi Cohen.Another pathetic lie
Trump directed the entire Conspiracy, as all the evidence shows.
You are the one lying, Farty. And the rest of us see it.But you knew that and knew you were lying when you posted the lie. This Is what sealions do.
