JimBowie1958
Old Fogey
- Sep 25, 2011
- 63,590
- 16,798
- 2,220
We have this Identity Politics system today that places people in pigeon holes and builds a string of these groups to produce electoral wins.
But suppose we had a subgroup like blind people; I doubt that anyone would begrudge them the right to organize to protect their own interests, to fight for funding, access to public buildings, etc.
But lets suppose that the ideology went beyond that and promoted the advantages of being blind? All the glories of being blind? And then drove a wedge between blind people and sighted people by feeding them loads of stacked deck agit propaganda so that they felt that all sighted people have always hated blind people?
That would be counter-productive and poor leadership. The leaders of the blind would be harming their interests instead of helping them, all in the faux claim of blindness being 'normal' or no different than normal.
And suppose these blind leaders then began to advocate the right of blind people to have their own children blinded, or to have their childs DNA changed so that it would be born blind as well, like their parents?
And suppose that we had the technology to cure blindness but the agit propaganda leaders would oppose it as a disaster for the 'community of the blind'?
I think most of us would recognize these last two iterations to be simply insane.
And yet that is exactly what these frauds are doing with their leadership of the black community, Hispanics and homosexuals across the nation. They are harming their constituents in order to keep them in need of the leaders role.
This is wrong and it is akin to serfdom.
But suppose we had a subgroup like blind people; I doubt that anyone would begrudge them the right to organize to protect their own interests, to fight for funding, access to public buildings, etc.
But lets suppose that the ideology went beyond that and promoted the advantages of being blind? All the glories of being blind? And then drove a wedge between blind people and sighted people by feeding them loads of stacked deck agit propaganda so that they felt that all sighted people have always hated blind people?
That would be counter-productive and poor leadership. The leaders of the blind would be harming their interests instead of helping them, all in the faux claim of blindness being 'normal' or no different than normal.
And suppose these blind leaders then began to advocate the right of blind people to have their own children blinded, or to have their childs DNA changed so that it would be born blind as well, like their parents?
And suppose that we had the technology to cure blindness but the agit propaganda leaders would oppose it as a disaster for the 'community of the blind'?
I think most of us would recognize these last two iterations to be simply insane.
And yet that is exactly what these frauds are doing with their leadership of the black community, Hispanics and homosexuals across the nation. They are harming their constituents in order to keep them in need of the leaders role.
This is wrong and it is akin to serfdom.
