Steven_R
Tommy Vercetti Fan Club
- Jul 17, 2013
- 4,852
- 932
- 245
With home schooling, the children don't get socialization and they don't have trained, educated, professional teachers. However, I think a private school would be preferable to a public school because it is smaller with a better teacher to student ratio. But, I would check out the school carefully before deciding on that. Some public schools are better than private schools. I would never send my child to a religious school, and in the US, most private schools are religious based.
People have the belief that bullying, cliques, and other social problems do not occur in private schools: this is not the fact at all. These things occur in all schools, public and private. However, these are also things that occur in the real world and children need to learn how to deal with them. I would not subject my child to a violent or vicious school experience, but home schooling puts them in an over protective environment that doesn't allow social skills to develop, skills that include coping with reallity.
What about when the public school just can't provide what the child needs? I'm not talking about mainstreaming disabled kids, but rather special cases. A kid I knew growing up was super smart and when we were in sixth grade he was doing calculus in his spare time and was just bored all day. He wasn't really old enough to go to college, but just wasted in the public school system and his parents ended up taking him out to home school.
Now if he didn't fit the one-size-fits-all education paradigm, should he be forced to stay anyways just to socialize him? What about kids who are musically inclined; should they be home-schooled to put an emphasis on a music education if they are just stagnating in a public school?
