The Great White Grift: How SC Turned School Vouchers Into a White Welfare Scam

[IM2]

Looks like I am stupid is wearing out his welcome

You are stupid, and you are still here. So it doesn't look like stupid has won out its welcome in this forum.

 

[Manonthestreet]

You are stupid, and you are still here. So it doesn't look like stupid has won out its welcome in this forum.

Punked again....lllmmaaaooo

 

[IM2]

Punked again....lllmmaaaooo

Yep, you've been punked again. It's good you can admit that.

 

[Unkotare]

I haven't. Got some of that democrat logic for me?

^

 

[Manonthestreet]

Yep, you've been punked again. It's good you can admit that.

Yeah thats it.......lllmmmaaooo

 

[Superbadbrutha]

So, living criminals with living victims.

Unlike now, where there have been no slaves for 150 years, and no institutional racism for 60 years.

DURRRRRR

DURRRR dumbass there are plenty of black folks living today that are survivors of Jim Crow, redlining, denied VA benefits, GI Bill, etc., but since you want to be accepted by white folks so bad you turn a blind eye to the injustices.

 

[markef]

We got inundated with stories about Somalis and fraud. We saw the white racists gleefully cheering for the deaths of American citizens and the harassment of non-white people in Minnesota because of a scheme committed by a few Somalis, led by whites. We won't see this story being mentioned anywhere but Contraband Camp.

The Great White Grift: How SC Turned School Vouchers Into a White Welfare Scam​

Have you considered a career in stealing?

Right now, the state of South Carolina is offering scholarships to 15,000 aspiring scammers who are committed to thieving money from Black taxpayers. If you have school-age children and belong to a poor, unfortunate, needy family that earns less than a measly $160,750 per year, you can probably qualify for a grifting voucher from the Education Scholarship Trust Fund (ESTF).

Of course, there are some small details.

Recipients can’t use the money for homeschooling or religious institutions. If your child attends public school, they will have to switch districts or attend a private school. The money can only be used to purchase school supplies or pre-authorized textbooks.

Also, it might be illegal.

The South Carolina Supreme Court has already ruled that a previous version of the ESTF program was unconstitutional. The revised version is expected to face another legal challenge. State legislators and the person who wrote the law have accused the superintendent of education of illegally funneling the money to white parents with zero oversight.

But if you’re white, you’ll be fine.

When the program started in 2024, most of the vouchers went to non-white students. Considering the demographics of South Carolina public schools, the distribution made sense. But with a few minor tweaks, the state managed to remake the taxpayer-funded plan into a welfare program for white people who don’t care about rules.

To be fair, none of this is new. The white citizens of South Carolina have been running a version of this state-supported embezzlement scheme since Black South Carolinians invented the American public education system in 1868.

The Original Grifters​

In 1948, South Carolina was full of white grifters.

Harry and Eliza Briggs lived in Clarendon County, S.C., where the segregated school district spent $179 per white child versus just $43 per Black child. To be fair, the Briggs children were better off than most kids in the Palmetto State, which spent $53 on every white student and $5 for Black students, a ratio of more than 10 to one. The state’s white schools were worth five times the combined value of its Black schools, a disparity replicated across the Jim Crow South.

The Briggs children attended dilapidated wooden schoolhouses without electricity or running water. Some Black children in the county rowed paddle boats across bodies of water, and sometimes, one of the Black kids would drown. So, after their tax dollars funded the unequal education system, the Black parents of Clarendon County had to purchase their own school bus. When it broke down, the parents asked Superintendent R.W. Elliott to use one of the district’s 30 school buses to transport the Black kids; Elliott refused. He argued that the taxpayers of Clarendon County were not responsible for transporting Black children.

Clarendon County was more than 70% Black.
Read it all here

The Great White Grift: How SC Turned School Vouchers Into a White Welfare Scam

S.C.'s Education Scholarship Trust Fund is plagued by discrimination, theft and illegal activities...because it was designed that way.

www.contrabandcamp.com

And if you are too poor to afford the 5 dollar monthly subscription to get in, too bad.

Don't be dense or racist. School vouchers are not a scam. Here is a scam:

 

[SweetTea]

In a perfect world, SC would secede again and stay seceded. They can take a few of our other Klan ruled states with them.

Klan ruled states? You guys have been sold a fake bill of goods. Hilarious.

 

[SweetTea]

You think it's hard work, but you more than likely got your start with a job you were hired for because you are white.

What a complete load of bull. I find it hard to believe that you actually believe this kind of stuff.

 

[hadit]

The racist argument never admits that such policies are needed because for all 250 years of American history, whites have hired less qualified white people over people of color, and without policies to stop that from happening, whites will continue doing it.

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

Do not try saying that is not true, because even with such policies in place there are whites not following the law. Those like you don't want to admit this even though you either see it being done, or actively participate in doing it.

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

Non racist whites acknowledge the history behind why these policies are necessary and do not try to argue the disingenuous mess we see from the right.

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

You guys seem to believe that because a piece of paper was signed in 1965, the attitude that caused the problem just vanished immediately after the signature, when it has never left.

If you think nothing has changed between 1965 and 2026, you're beyond help.

Your questioning the qualifications of blacks when they get a job while not doing the same of whites, is how racism is done today.

Are you actually claiming that corporations and government do NOT just check a box to avoid lawsuits? Minority applicants have to overcome the stigma of being helped because of their skin color.

"If minority workers are superior, they should get the job."

Why can't you consider that whites are not getting jobs because they are not qualified intead of the "if minorities" are this or that?

They shouldn't be getting jobs on the basis of their skin color, that's the point. Again, I don't care if my doctor is white, brown, or in between, I want him to be competent, and that means he'd better have gotten his job because he knows what he's doing. If you think that's racist, you're beyond help. Tell us honestly, do you insist on a minority doctor, or do you just want the best to operate on you?

How about realizing that for the entire 250 years America has been a country whites have been getting jobs due to racial preference and that something has to be done to give everyone a fair opportunity. Why do we have to continue to be born into and live in deficits we did not create so you guys can live with an advantage you did not earn?

And what did I say? Go back and read what I actually said, not what your bigoted mind insists I said. Remember this? I've put it in my post multiple times.

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

Now, what is racist about holding minorities to the same standards as everyone else? Should Tiger Woods be allowed to tee off 50 yards closer to the hole, or be expected to excel from the same tee as everyone else? Should Eminem be given extra play on the radio or be expected to earn it on his own merits?

You did not address that.

 

[Unkotare]

DURRRR dumbass there are plenty of black folks living today that are survivors of Jim Crow, redlining, denied VA benefits, GI Bill, etc.,

Are you part of that "plenty"?

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Are you part of that "plenty"?

Yep.

 

[Unkotare]

Yep.

What are you a "survivor" of then?

 

[IM2]

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

If you think nothing has changed between 1965 and 2026, you're beyond help.

Are you actually claiming that corporations and government do NOT just check a box to avoid lawsuits? Minority applicants have to overcome the stigma of being helped because of their skin color.

They shouldn't be getting jobs on the basis of their skin color, that's the point. Again, I don't care if my doctor is white, brown, or in between, I want him to be competent, and that means he'd better have gotten his job because he knows what he's doing. If you think that's racist, you're beyond help. Tell us honestly, do you insist on a minority doctor, or do you just want the best to operate on you?

And what did I say? Go back and read what I actually said, not what your bigoted mind insists I said. Remember this? I've put it in my post multiple times.

"DEI and Affirmative Action are great ideas for addressing past wrongs"

Now, what is racist about holding minorities to the same standards as everyone else? Should Tiger Woods be allowed to tee off 50 yards closer to the hole, or be expected to excel from the same tee as everyone else? Should Eminem be given extra play on the radio or be expected to earn it on his own merits?

You did not address that.

I have indeed addressed it.

I read every word you posted and it is the same trifling denial of what has been done for whites that you and the other racist here consistently have posted.

Whites have been hired based on their skin color from day 1 until now. Your ignorance is incredible and it doesn't allow you to see the racism you exhibit. You keep talking about lowered standards only for blacks, but you have never been able to admit the consistent racial preferences provied to whites. Using your Tiger Woods example, whited have been the ones getting to tee off 50 yards closer to the hole. Whites have been the ones given extra play. Whites have not achieved everything they have because of merit.

Your argument is the evidence of white privilege. There is not one nonwhite group in this country who could complain about racism when they are the majority of the employees anywhere. You racists ran your mouths about black NBA players talking about being slaves because 80 percent of the NBA players are black, but you whites are 76 percent of the workforce, 80 plus percent of managers and CEOs, while you are less than 60 percent of the population, yet you are complaining about racism against whites and the majority white supreme court decided to agree with your whining even though your complaints are not true based on the facts.

Your argument is racist. Period. Less qualified whites have been hired and promoted for 250 years in this country and it happens only because of skin color. You guys are complaining about real efforts to hire and promote based on merit. White skin does not automatically mean higher standards or best qualified. DEI/Affirmative Action were policies to make sure that skin color did not matter. White is a skin color mf. White is also a race. Learn that then begin to resonate the understanding that whites are the ones who are hired by skin color the most and nothing else.

 

[hadit]

I have indeed addressed it.

I read every word you posted and it is the same trifling denial of what has been done for whites that you and the other racist here consistently have posted.

Whites have been hired based on their skin color from day 1 until now. Your ignorance is incredible and it doesn't allow you to see the racism you exhibit. You keep talking about lowered standards only for blacks, but you have never been able to admit the consistent racial preferences provied to whites. Using your Tiger Woods example, whited have been the ones getting to tee off 50 yards closer to the hole. Whites have been the ones given extra play. Whites have not achieved everything they have because of merit.

Your argument is the evidence of white privilege. There is not one nonwhite group in this country who could complain about racism when they are the majority of the employees anywhere. You racists ran your mouths about black NBA players talking about being slaves because 80 percent of the NBA players are black, but you whites are 76 percent of the workforce, 80 plus percent of managers and CEOs, while you are less than 60 percent of the population, yet you are complaining about racism against whites and the majority white supreme court decided to agree with your whining even though your complaints are not true based on the facts.

Your argument is racist. Period. Less qualified whites have been hired and promoted for 250 years in this country and it happens only because of skin color. You guys are complaining about real efforts to hire and promote based on merit. White skin does not automatically mean higher standards or best qualified. DEI/Affirmative Action were policies to make sure that skin color did not matter. White is a skin color mf. White is also a race. Learn that then begin to resonate the understanding that whites are the ones who are hired by skin color the most and nothing else.

And you ignore what I said about all that. Do you remember? It was just a few posts ago. Here it is, since I have no confidence you will find it, much less acknowledge it:

"They shouldn't be getting jobs on the basis of their skin color, that's the point."

That applies to white, pink, brown and black skin colors. Again, and you steadfastly ignore this, do you really care what color skin your doctor has? How about the guys who built the bridge you're driving over?

Finally, be explicit. Why do you consider it racist to hold minorities to the same standards as everyone else? Should Tiger Woods tee off 50 yards closer to the hole? Should Eminem be granted more magazine covers?

 

[Unkotare]

And you ignore what I said about all that. Do you remember? It was just a few posts ago. Here it is, since I have no confidence you will find it, much less acknowledge it:

"They shouldn't be getting jobs on the basis of their skin color, that's the point."

That applies to white, pink, brown and black skin colors. Again, and you steadfastly ignore this, do you really care what color skin your doctor has? How about the guys who built the bridge you're driving over?

Finally, be explicit. Why do you consider it racist to hold minorities to the same standards as everyone else? Should Tiger Woods tee off 50 yards closer to the hole? Should Eminem be granted more magazine covers?

Don't waste your time. You could tell him it's raining outside and he'd call you racist. He's only got the one response to everything.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

What are you a "survivor" of then?

Damn Unkotex keep up.

 

[Unkotare]

Damn Unkotex keep up.

Be specific.

 

[Superbadbrutha]

Be specific.

I'm almost 70yrs old, you do the math. BTW are you a white man?

 

[Unkotare]

I'm almost 70yrs old...

I didn't ask how old you are.