Nostra
Diamond Member
- Oct 7, 2019
- 68,450
- 58,713
- 3,615
OK, then how do you explain 2016?
Well the national polls were not wrong. That’s what you’re not getting. The media made the mistake in believing that Hillary’s lead in the polls meant she would win because only FOUR prior presidential elections in US history had the winning candidate losing the popular vote. Trump’s win was a fluke. The only actual polling mistakes were in state polls like PA, WI, and MI. That’s it. Those were the only inaccurate polls.
We don't have a "national election", that's what you're not getting.
We have 50 state elections.
Perhaps you need an education on how our system works. Try heading back to the 6th grade again.......(which I'm guessing would make it your third time)...or maybe the first time.
Oh my god you people are so fucking dense lol. How you’re missing such a basic point is bewildering. Yeah dude no shit the popular vote doesn’t decide the election. I’m simply pointing out the sheer fluke of a winning candidate losing the popular vote. HISTORICALLY, only FIVE candidates INCLUDING Trump have lost the popular vote. That’s what made his win surprising.
Bill Clinton lost the popular vote, twice. I don't see you whining and crying about it.
lol I don’t give a flying shit about Bill Clinton. Only you care. Of course, you’re wrong. He won the popular vote both times. You’re thinking of a candidate getting the plurality. Clinton got more votes than both candidates.
No, the majority of the popular vote voted against both Clintons. Slick got 43% and 47% in both elections. That is LOSING the "national vote", as you talked about in the OP.
Well they voted against the republican candidates even more. Derp!
And yet, President Donald J Trump.
But hey, I accept your admission you were full of shit.
Well nothing I've said has been incorrect but whatever helps your tender sensibilities.
You claimed the Clintons won the popular vote. That's a lie. Neither ever got a majority of the popular vote.
More Americans voted against them than voted for them.
And Hitlery got almost 4 million more votes in KKKalifornia.................so basically, she won the popular vote in one state, and lost it when you add up the other 49.
Um no they still won the popular vote by getting more votes so go suck a dick. None of this changes the fact that republicans were left more sour in comparison in those contests so your gloating comes across retarded.
Nope. The popular vote is defined as all votes cast nationally. They lost that. Neither got a majority of the popular vote.
Math isn't your strong suit, is it?
You knew nothing about the popular vote until i educated you today. We both know it. You just Googled the rest.
Now you are just lashing out in a temper tantrum because you got your ass kicked in your own thread.