What's new
US Message Board 🦅 Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Greatest Thread ever on 911

Gamolon

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
368
Points
130
:auiqs.jpg:

You mean my agenda is showing that truthers are idiots? Well done Angelo!

I guess now that you've read what Christophera actually believes the construction of the twin towers was composed of, you support it? Do you believe that here was a concrete core around the 47 core columns that had 16' thick concrete walls at it's base and tapered to 2' thick concrete walls at the top, some 1300' in the air?

Or did you just post this stuff blindly without knowing what Christophera believed existed?

You want to debate this now chickenshit? Or will you run like you always do?
 
Last edited:
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
You do realize that the hole pictured above is the exit hole in the C-Ring and NOT the entry hole where the plane impacted the wall right?



That is actually not the "official explanation." The "official explanation" of that is it was an engine. Nice try....

That is the entry point of the cruise missile. It smashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside. Bunker buster....
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
Craft a simple, compelling counter narrative to the 9/11 Commission Report pointing out the major flaws in the government's report.


LOL!!!


The topic linked in the OP is a thorough trashing of all of the Commission report, which is not believed by a majority of americans.

The first step is Col Osman....

Any photos of "Osama" in Saudi yet????



The Saudi Royal family is Jewish. You know that. So does anyone who clicks on the Bing search above. That also explains why Jeff Epstein's #1 customer on his Pedophile island was "islamic" Saudi Crown Prince bin Salman....





Media reports and court documents have unearthed new details about the 66-year-old financier's life, including his ties to the Middle East, notably to figures in Saudi Arabia and Israel.

A year before his suspected suicide, Epstein boasted of his ties to powerful Saudi leaders, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the New York Times reported on Monday.

Detailing his visit to Epstein’s New York mansion last August, journalist James Stewart described how the alleged rapist showed him a photograph of bin Salman - commonly referred to as MBS - hanging on his wall.

"The crown prince had visited him many times, and they spoke often," Stewart said Epstein told him.

Epstein's address book had listings for a “Saud, Prince Solman” - widely believed to be MBS’s father, King Salman bin Abdulaziz - and MBS’s cousin and former Saudi ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan.







Amazing how close the Saudi Royal Family and Epstein were, especially considering both made a fortune on 911 investing in


Gold
Oil
Defense Stocks
the US Long Bond
 

the other mike

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
34,216
Reaction score
17,196
Points
1,915
Location
Secret City under Denver Airport
LOL!!!


The topic linked in the OP is a thorough trashing of all of the Commission report, which is not believed by a majority of americans.

The first step is Col Osman....

Any photos of "Osama" in Saudi yet????



The Saudi Royal family is Jewish. You know that. So does anyone who clicks on the Bing search above. That also explains why Jeff Epstein's #1 customer on his Pedophile island was "islamic" Saudi Crown Prince bin Salman....





Media reports and court documents have unearthed new details about the 66-year-old financier's life, including his ties to the Middle East, notably to figures in Saudi Arabia and Israel.

A year before his suspected suicide, Epstein boasted of his ties to powerful Saudi leaders, including Crown Prince Mohammed bin Salman, the New York Times reported on Monday.

Detailing his visit to Epstein’s New York mansion last August, journalist James Stewart described how the alleged rapist showed him a photograph of bin Salman - commonly referred to as MBS - hanging on his wall.

"The crown prince had visited him many times, and they spoke often," Stewart said Epstein told him.

Epstein's address book had listings for a “Saud, Prince Solman” - widely believed to be MBS’s father, King Salman bin Abdulaziz - and MBS’s cousin and former Saudi ambassador to the United States, Prince Bandar bin Sultan.







Amazing how close the Saudi Royal Family and Epstein were, especially considering both made a fortune on 911 investing in


Gold
Oil
Defense Stocks
the US Long Bond
I want to know who the real masterminds were.
 

the other mike

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
34,216
Reaction score
17,196
Points
1,915
Location
Secret City under Denver Airport

Near-Free-Fall Acceleration | Twin Towers​

According to the National Institute of Standards and Technology (NIST) — which is the U.S. government agency that investigated the World Trade Center’s destruction — the Twin Towers came down “essentially in free fall.” 1
NIST’s theory of the collapses hinges on the idea that the upper section of each tower could continuously accelerate through the lower stories at nearly the rate of gravity, while in the process completely dismembering the steel frames and pulverizing nearly all of the concrete to a fine powder.
Yet NIST provided no modeling or calculations to demonstrate that such behavior was possible. Instead, NIST arbitrarily stopped its analysis at the moment of “collapse initiation,” asserting that total collapse was “inevitable” once the collapses initiated.2
Astonishingly, NIST’s entire explanation for why the lower sections failed to stop or even slow the descent of the upper sections is limited to half a page of its 10,000-page report, in a section titled “Events Following Collapse Initiation,” 3 which asserts:
“The structure below the level of collapse initiation provided minimal resistance to the falling building mass at and above the impact zone. The potential energy released by the downward movement of the large building mass far exceeded the capacity of the intact structure below to absorb that through energy of deformation.
“Since the stories below the level of collapse initiation provided little resistance to the tremendous energy released by the falling building mass, the building section above came down essentially in free fall, as seen in videos.” — p. 146, NIST NCSTAR 1

In 2007, a group of scientists, an architect, and two 9/11 family members filed a “Request for Correction” to the NIST report under the Information Quality Act. They argued that, among other things, NIST failed to establish the likely technical cause of the building failures because it did not explain why, after collapse initiation, total collapse had ensued.4 They wrote:
“Here, NIST has not offered any explanation as to why (i.e. the technical cause of) the story below the collapse zone was not able to arrest the downward movement of the upper floors. The statement “as evidenced by the videos from several vantage points” is only an explanation of what occurred, but gives the reader absolutely no idea why it occurred. Basic principles of engineering (for example, the conservation of momentum principle) would dictate that the undamaged steel structure below the collapse zone would, at the very least, resist and slow the downward movement of the stories above…. The families of the firefighters and WTC employees that were trapped in the stairwells when the entirety of the WTC Towers collapsed on top of them would surely appreciate an adequate explanation of why the lower structure failed to arrest or even resist the collapse of the upper floors.” — p. 20, Request for Correction
NIST responded to the Request for Correction with the remarkable admission that it was not able to provide a full explanation of the total collapse: 5
“NIST carried its analysis to the point where the buildings reached global instability. At this point, because of the magnitude of deflections and the number of failures occurring, the computer models are not able to converge on a solution…. [W]e are unable to provide a full explanation of the total collapse.” — p. 3-4, NIST Response to Request for Correction

Total Collapse Explained​

While NIST failed to provide an explanation for the total collapse of the Twin Towers, several independent researchers have taken on that challenge.
north_tower_200x155.jpg
The upper section of the North Tower.
Central to their analysis has been to measure the downward motion of the upper section of WTC 1 (the North Tower). Two papers in particular have found that, in the four seconds before the upper section disappeared from view, the rate of acceleration remained constant, at approximately 64 percent of free fall,6 and there was never an observable deceleration.7
Based on Newton’s Third Law of Motion, which states that for every action there is an equal and opposite reaction, we know there would have been a deceleration of WTC 1’s upper section if it had impacted and crushed the intact structure below it. The absence of deceleration is incontrovertible proof that another force (i.e., explosives) must have been responsible for destroying the lower structure before the upper section reached it.
Velocityvstime.png
Figure 1: This graph from David Chandler’s “Destruction of the World Trade Center North Tower and Fundamental Physics” (Journal of 9/11 Studies, February 2010) shows that the North Tower’s upper section traveled at nearly uniform downward acceleration of -6.31 m/s2 (with an R2 value of 0.997), or 64% of free fall.
In 2011, the ASCE’s Journal of Engineering Mechanics published a paper by Dr. Zdeněk Bažant and Jia-Liang Le titled “Why the Observed Motion History of the World Trade Center Towers Is Smooth,” 8 in which the authors attempted to argue that the upper section’s deceleration was “far too small to be perceptible,” thus accounting for why the observed motion is “smooth.” Specifically, they calculated, the deceleration was “three orders of magnitudes smaller than the error of an amateur video, and thus undetectable.”
In response, researchers Tony Szamboti and Richard Johns submitted a Discussion paper to the Journal of Engineering Mechanics in May 2011.9 Their paper argued that Bažant and Le had used incorrect values for (1) the resistance of the columns, (2) the lower structure’s floor mass, and (3) the upper section’s total mass. Szamboti and Johns showed that when the correct values are applied, Bažant and Le’s analysis actually proves that the deceleration of the upper section would have been significant and detectable (if it were a true fire-induced progressive collapse), and that the collapse would have arrested within three seconds.
Unfortunately, the Journal of Engineering Mechanics inexplicably rejected Szamboti and Johns’ Discussion paper as “out of scope” after holding it in review for 27 months. So Szamboti and Johns, along with Dr. Gregory Szuladziński, a world-renowned expert in structural mechanics, wrote another paper refuting Bažant and Le’s analysis and submitted it to the International Journal of Protective Structures. That paper, titled “Some Misunderstandings Related to the WTC Collapse Analysis,” 10 was published in June 2013.
So little research has been published on why the Twin Towers underwent total collapse that Bažant and Le’s 2011 paper, and Bažant’s three earlier papers on the subject, are the only analysis that exists to support the official explanation of a fire-induced progressive collapse. That analysis has now been indisputably debunked by Szamboti, Johns, Szuladziński, and others.
And a video for candycorn .

 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
This paid shill also thinks oswald killed jfk,he is probably a sock of soup nazis.



They are full time paid message board liars. That is what they do, they shout down truth here while their allies in the media censor...



And they lie about all of the Zionist Treason against America...


JFK
USS Liberty
MLK
RFK
Marines in Lebanon 1983
Pan Am 103
911
ISIS
Covid
The Steal
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
Instead, NIST arbitrarily stopped its analysis at the moment of “collapse initiation,” asserting that total collapse was “inevitable” once the collapses initiated.2



What we call "Climate Science," which means


FUDGE DATA
LIE ABOUT DATA
HIDE DATA
MAKE SHIT UP WHEN NECESSARY
IGNORE/CENSOR TRUTH OUTING FRAUD AS FRAUD
 

the other mike

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
34,216
Reaction score
17,196
Points
1,915
Location
Secret City under Denver Airport
What we call "Climate Science," which means


FUDGE DATA
LIE ABOUT DATA
HIDE DATA
MAKE SHIT UP WHEN NECESSARY
IGNORE/CENSOR TRUTH OUTING FRAUD AS FRAUD
Then when you can whack any potential whistleblowers, blackmail the media and fill the internet with misinformation trolls....

All they have to fear is very guilty consciences now right ?
Or maybe they're part reptile, which wouldn't surprise me, especially with Soupnazi630 .
 
Last edited:
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
Then when you can whack any potential whistleblowers, blackmail the media and fill the internet with misinformation trolls....

All they have to fear is very guilty consciences now right ?
Or maybe they're part reptile.


The media, the covid liars, the fudgebaking liars called climate "scientists," the 911 liars, and the lawyers are all on the same team

TEAM ZIONISM
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
Tom is still alive in Iran ?



Dude, you do not get it. "They" put out false BS. The "solar cycle" in climate science is their "skeptic" bs, because they can easily refute it as insignificant. They put out "solar cycle" so idiots who know algore is a liar but do not understand science will parrot it, and hence "discredit skeptics."

Iran is not Israel's ally. There are Zionist Jews in Iran who cause trouble for Iran, some of who are "dual citizens" of US and Israel, and hence the "US" media always calls them "Americans." Crap. They are zionist Israelis operating to sabotage Iran.


STOP PARROTING.

Think, analyze, and know what you know, and do not assume another "skeptic" is telling the truth, or is even on your side. Those who put out "solar cycle" are taxpayer funded liars just like Mann and Hansen....
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
42,925
Reaction score
10,912
Points
2,030
They are full time paid message board liars. That is what they do, they shout down truth here while their allies in the media censor...



And they lie about all of the Zionist Treason against America...


JFK
USS Liberty
MLK
RFK
Marines in Lebanon 1983
Pan Am 103
911
ISIS
Covid
The Steal
Yep agents gam,soupnazi and candyass are paid well at Langley and their Israel buddies to fart in threads about those topics.
 

LA RAM FAN

Diamond Member
Joined
Mar 1, 2008
Messages
42,925
Reaction score
10,912
Points
2,030
Dude, you do not get it. "They" put out false BS. The "solar cycle" in climate science is their "skeptic" bs, because they can easily refute it as insignificant. They put out "solar cycle" so idiots who know algore is a liar but do not understand science will parrot it, and hence "discredit skeptics."

Iran is not Israel's ally. There are Zionist Jews in Iran who cause trouble for Iran, some of who are "dual citizens" of US and Israel, and hence the "US" media always calls them "Americans." Crap. They are zionist Israelis operating to sabotage Iran.


STOP PARROTING.

Think, analyze, and know what you know, and do not assume another "skeptic" is telling the truth, or is even on your side. Those who put out "solar cycle" are taxpayer funded liars just like Mann and Hansen....
:thankusmile: :clap::clap::clap::clap::clap:Well said.:thup:
 

Gamolon

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
368
Points
130
That is actually not the "official explanation." The "official explanation" of that is it was an engine. Nice try....

That is the entry point of the cruise missile. It smashed through steel reinforced concrete and blew up inside. Bunker buster....
The picture you posted is the entry point of the cruise missile in the exterior concrete wall of the Pentagon? This picture?
pententry.jpg
 

Gamolon

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
368
Points
130
I killed you every time you attempted to "debate",
Mr Dulles.
Hmmmm...

So Angelo believes Christophera is correct in that the twin towers had a massive concrete core surrounding the 47 core columns, 16' thick at it's base, tapering to 2' thick at the top, about 1300' high.

That's good to know Angelo.
 

Gamolon

Gold Member
Joined
Aug 31, 2009
Messages
3,656
Reaction score
368
Points
130
I want to know who the real masterminds were.
How much are you and your board buddies getting from the terrorists Angelo? Must be a pretty penny to continue to muddy the waters of internet forums and keep everyone at odds with each other.

Are they promising you virgins after you die?
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
The picture you posted is the entry point of the cruise missile in the exterior concrete wall of the Pentagon? This picture?
View attachment 547802


If you think a 757 fit in that hole, then you qualify as having an IQ under 5.

That is actually the second wall the cruise missile smashed through....

What is your explanation of that?

LOL

The nose of the 757? It blew up inside and made that hole??? LOL!!!!

What an amazingly "targeted" explosion... LOL...


That hole is reminiscent of the lie about the USS Cole, which was hit by a missile, not a boat....



R.f594311971ab7ba132369e059875a080





Who did "they" blame for this?

AQ

Whenever they blame AQ, the CIA/Mossad did it....

That was a MISSILE, not a boat with a bomb....
 
OP
L

LaDairis

Gold Member
Joined
May 9, 2019
Messages
4,467
Reaction score
960
Points
140
How much are you and your board buddies getting from the terrorists Angelo? Must be a pretty penny to continue to muddy the waters of internet forums and keep everyone at odds with each other.

Are they promising you virgins after you die?


"The terrorists" = the language of the SUB


"the terrorists" = all the "Republicans for Biden"
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$295.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top