So they explain why having 120 ppm more CO2 in our atmosphere led to our plant being 2C cooler than the past?Dude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.
You have silly paid for oil money doubt that nobody believes.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
So they explain why having 120 ppm more CO2 in our atmosphere led to our plant being 2C cooler than the past?Dude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.
You have silly paid for oil money doubt that nobody believes.
When was that again?So they explain why having more CO2 in our atmosphere led to our plant being 2C cooler than the past?
Sorry you missed it. Here's one:View attachment 730475View attachment 730476
View attachment 730477
Do I need to tell you that this graph has nothing to do with human emissions of carbon dioxide?
Post one piece of evidence thenDude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.
You have silly paid for oil money doubt that nobody believes.
Sorry you missed it. Here's one:
View attachment 730479
The Keeling Curve
The Keeling Curve is a daily record of global atmospheric carbon dioxide concentration maintained by Scripps Institution of Oceanography at UC San Diego.keelingcurve.ucsd.edu
Sorry, not playing the maga fuckup denial game.Post one piece of evidence then
Yeah, I know. You’re a demofk with crap between your ears. Any day bring in evidence of gw or climate changeSorry, not playing the maga fuckup denial game.
You literally have no facts to support your position.
What is "oil money" and what billions do you believe the government is handing out?"Oil money" for research pales in comparison to the billions in government handouts to wackos for lying and exaggerating in panic about global warming, renamed climate change after the "warming" wasn't all they swore it would be. So now it's whatever they say it is (hurricanes, wildfires, and crime too!).
Allow me to repeat what the wise man said "You literally have no facts to support your position". You keep demanding evidence from others but have presented NONE yourself. And you never accept evidence that others do present to you. So what's the point? It would seem you're just another TROLL and I'd be pleased as punch if IMDB management gave you the boot. They should have done it a great long while ago.Yeah, I know. You’re a demofk with crap between your ears. Any day bring in evidence of gw or climate change
You want me to present evidence for something you say exists? Hahahabut have presented NONE yourself
Tax moneyWhat is "oil money" and what billions do you believe the government is handing out?
Dude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.
You have silly paid for oil money doubt that nobody believes.
The significance, as you've been told before, is due to the speed with which the Earth warmed 1.1C.What's missing is the "degree" of change ... ha ha ... and I mean that both ways ... why do you think the single degree of warming has any significance at all? ... and why do you think another degree of warming will have catastrophic results? ...
False dichotomy. We can address both, particularly since they are related.Continents are moving ten times faster than sea levels are rising ... can't we be realistic about these so-called dangers of a slightly warmer world here? ... the extra rainfall won't be enough to solve our drinking water problems ... shouldn't we be addressing that instead? ...
Post your evidenceThe significance, as you've been told before, is due to the speed with which the Earth warmed 1.1C.
False dichotomy. We can address both, particularly since they are related.
The significance, as you've been told before, is due to the speed with which the Earth warmed 1.1C.
False dichotomy. We can address both, particularly since they are related.
I already told you? Do you believe the laws of radiative forcing changed or something?When was that again?
How old are you?NOAA's trace only shows a 0.8ºC warming ... you're LYING again ... such a nasty habit for you, very unladylike ... like picking your nose, just can't stop can you? ...
How much of that was from the radiative forcing of CO2 alone?How old are you?
And, yes, its 1.1C.