Global Warming Liars

There are two mechanisms taking place. 1) Gases dissolve in liquids (ex: the bubbles in your soda). Unlike the more familiar solution of solids in liquids (like sugar in your coffee) when the liquid temperature increases, gas solubility goes down. So when something raises the temperature of the Earth. the solubility of CO2 in the oceans is reduced and its levels in the atmosphere rise. When temperatures fall, its solubility increases and its levels in the atmosphere fall. 2) CO2 in the atmosphere is a greenouse gas because it absorbs infrared light that all matter emits to radiate heat. That allows it to capture IR emitted by the land and oceans warmed by the visible light of the sun and slow its escape to space. That causes the planet to warm and is known as the greenhouse effect.
 
It does enormous good for everyone to leave the oil where it is. The behavior of celebrities you don't like is completely and obviously irrelevant. That you think otherwise is just a good indicator of your personal qualities.
why does it benefit us? No cell phones, no computers, well home ones anyway. No cars. no heat. holy fk, what is it you're after?
 
I’m still waiting on the alternative resources that can warm people!! Or is it people shouldn’t exist?

"There are too many people!" > say the Leftists

"Abort those babies! Especially you black women!" >>> Leftists, at the behest of racist Margaret Sanger
Black women get abortions at five or six times the rate of white women.
MargaretSanger-Link2.jpg
 
"There are too many people!" > say the Leftists

"Abort those babies! Especially you black women!" >>> Leftists, at the behest of racist Margaret Sanger
Black women get abortions at five or six times the rate of white women.View attachment 729135

You really need to check stuff before you post. This makes you look REALLY gullible.

Sanger, a feminist and reproductive rights activist, opened the first birth control clinic in Brownsville, Brooklyn, in 1916, giving access to low-income and minority women (here).

She started “The Negro Project” in 1939, with the aim of expanding birth control services for Black communities in the south, according to the New York University’s project documenting Sanger’s writings. (here)


The quote is real and appears in a Dec. 10, 1939 letter to a program director advocating employing Black physicians and ministers to gain trust of the communities the program was meant to serve (here).

Sanger’s concern was to avoid a suspicion that the program’s objective was to stop Black people having babies, which having white people in charge could create.

She wrote: “The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

In 2015, the Washington Post, addressing accusations of racism levelled against Sanger brought up her 1939 letter, saying that while the passage quoted above was “inartfully written” it was “frequently taken out of context to suggest Sanger was seeking to exterminate blacks.” (here)

TIME magazine re-examined claims that Sanger advocated exterminating Blacks in 2016, saying that Sanger’s oft-cited sentence, “in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission.” (here) Factcheck.org reached similar conclusions in 2011 (here).

 
You really need to check stuff before you post. This makes you look REALLY gullible.

Sanger, a feminist and reproductive rights activist, opened the first birth control clinic in Brownsville, Brooklyn, in 1916, giving access to low-income and minority women (here).

She started “The Negro Project” in 1939, with the aim of expanding birth control services for Black communities in the south, according to the New York University’s project documenting Sanger’s writings. (here)


The quote is real and appears in a Dec. 10, 1939 letter to a program director advocating employing Black physicians and ministers to gain trust of the communities the program was meant to serve (here).

Sanger’s concern was to avoid a suspicion that the program’s objective was to stop Black people having babies, which having white people in charge could create.

She wrote: “The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

In 2015, the Washington Post, addressing accusations of racism levelled against Sanger brought up her 1939 letter, saying that while the passage quoted above was “inartfully written” it was “frequently taken out of context to suggest Sanger was seeking to exterminate blacks.” (here)

TIME magazine re-examined claims that Sanger advocated exterminating Blacks in 2016, saying that Sanger’s oft-cited sentence, “in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission.” (here) Factcheck.org reached similar conclusions in 2011 (here).

Sanger believed that abortion was an abomination and wouldn’t allow them to be performed in her clinic.
 
You really need to check stuff before you post. This makes you look REALLY gullible.

Sanger, a feminist and reproductive rights activist, opened the first birth control clinic in Brownsville, Brooklyn, in 1916, giving access to low-income and minority women (here).

She started “The Negro Project” in 1939, with the aim of expanding birth control services for Black communities in the south, according to the New York University’s project documenting Sanger’s writings. (here)


The quote is real and appears in a Dec. 10, 1939 letter to a program director advocating employing Black physicians and ministers to gain trust of the communities the program was meant to serve (here).

Sanger’s concern was to avoid a suspicion that the program’s objective was to stop Black people having babies, which having white people in charge could create.

She wrote: “The minister’s work is also important and he should be trained, perhaps by the Federation as to our ideals and the goal that we hope to reach. We do not want word to go out that we want to exterminate the Negro population and the minister is the man who can straighten out that idea if it ever occurs to any of their more rebellious members.”

In 2015, the Washington Post, addressing accusations of racism levelled against Sanger brought up her 1939 letter, saying that while the passage quoted above was “inartfully written” it was “frequently taken out of context to suggest Sanger was seeking to exterminate blacks.” (here)

TIME magazine re-examined claims that Sanger advocated exterminating Blacks in 2016, saying that Sanger’s oft-cited sentence, “in context, describes the sort of preposterous allegations she feared — not her actual mission.” (here) Factcheck.org reached similar conclusions in 2011 (here).

just wow, what you think you actually posted. wow.
 
why does it benefit us? No cell phones, no computers, well home ones anyway. No cars. no heat. holy fk, what is it you're after?

Leftists want everyone else to be as bitter and miserable as they are. If you are not, they are
contemptibly jealous. The world has been coming to a rapid end for decades and it's only getting
worse. Just ask Al Gore or the little 13-year-old harridan from Sweden who bypassed childhood.
 
I want to know the dates, causation and why you think it applies to our current climate change.
Why was it 2C warmer with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today?

Because temperature does not correlate to CO2 today. It never has. Prior to the industrial revolution CO2 correlated to temperature. Now CO2 correlates to emissions.

That’s why it’s relevant.
 
Leftists want everyone else to be as bitter and miserable as they are. If you are not, they are
contemptibly jealous. The world has been coming to a rapid end for decades and it's only getting
worse. Just ask Al Gore or the little 13-year-old harridan from Sweden who bypassed childhood.
Have you ever considered the possibility that you're wrong? Everyone should do that once in a while. Look at all these fools that bought Trump'ss Big Lie. They think the country has been stolen when, in fact, it is they who are trying to steal it. And making derogatory generalizations is logical shit. And, if you'd like to make derogatory generalizations, from my point of view it is conservatives that tend to be bitter. I think liberals are worried and concerned and some of them are even frightened, but every time I meet someone at the far right end of the spectrum, I see bitterness, anger and a feeling that they've been unfairly shortchanged by the world around them. You have always seemed bitter to me. Angry at the world. It's as if you want to blame everyone else for all your problems and never consider the possibility that you might have caused some of them or that some of them aren't even real. Just ask Al Gore or the 19-year old Greta Thunberg.
 
Why was it 2C warmer with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today?

Because temperature does not correlate to CO2 today. It never has. Prior to the industrial revolution CO2 correlated to temperature. Now CO2 correlates to emissions.

That’s why it’s relevant.
Show a chart of CO2 and temperature.
 
Have you ever considered the possibility that you're wrong? Everyone should do that once in a while. Look at all these fools that bought Trump'ss Big Lie. They think the country has been stolen when, in fact, it is they who are trying to steal it. And making derogatory generalizations is logical shit. And, if you'd like to make derogatory generalizations, from my point of view it is conservatives that tend to be bitter. I think liberals are worried and concerned and some of them are even frightened, but every time I meet someone at the far right end of the spectrum, I see bitterness, anger and a feeling that they've been unfairly shortchanged by the world around them. You have always seemed bitter to me. Angry at the world. It's as if you want to blame everyone else for all your problems and never consider the possibility that you might have caused some of them or that some of them aren't even real. Just ask Al Gore or the 19-year old Greta Thunberg.
I’m not wrong, thanks for asking
 
Show a chart of CO2 and temperature.
You’d learn more if you researched it yourself. The data shouldn’t be hard to find. The sea levels were 26 ft higher in the last interglacial cycle. Imagine that, 26 ft higher seas with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2 than today.
 
The last interglacial cycle. Why don’t you know this?
Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.


You know, like actual climate scientists.
 
abcdefghijklmnopqrstuvwcxyz now is the tinme for all good ment to conme to theia dojhutkrnjejhf.newdlfhwej sadjdljfesr ;szn fjwlefsljs;kfg sdf ldsgj dslfg jdfmvcgtjk;lfmvlddfljgldf j jmcldf jgl
Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.


You know, like actual climate scientists.
I think someone needs to point out that correlation between two trends is not determined by their characteristics at a single point in time.
 

Forum List

Back
Top