Global Warming Liars

[ding]

Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.


You know, like actual climate scientists.

It’s public record. You will get more from discovering it yourself.

 

[jc456]

Then post the dates, causation and atmospheric composition to make your case for 120ppm and temperature.


You know, like actual climate scientists.

so you have data on how warm 120PPM is from climate scientists? post it please.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Many, many "actual" climate scientists have published papers and books on the fraud of climate change. They are simply dismissed by fearmongering Leftists with a socialist agenda.

 

[Crick]

Many, many "actual" climate scientists have published papers and books on the fraud of climate change. They are simply dismissed by fearmongering Leftists with a socialist agenda.

Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.

 

[jc456]

Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.

Who do you think you are?

 

[Crick]

Who do you think you are?

Poster Crick. You?

 

[jc456]

Poster Crick. You?

Popeye, with the same rights as you! That must suck for your condescending mind

 

[otto105]

It’s public record. You will get more from discovering it yourself.

Why the dodge on something you consider so convincing?

 

[ding]

Why the dodge on something you consider so convincing?

There’s no dodge at all. I know what the data shows. It will mean more to you if you go and discover it for yourself.

Or if you like you can search for someone who doesn’t believe the previous interglacial cycle was 2C warmer with 26 ft higher seas and 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2. Good luck with that because no one doesn’t believe that.

 

[Crick]

Popeye, with the same rights as you! That must suck for your condescending mind

Your last two posts have been incomprehensible.

 

[ChemEngineer]

Can you name some of these papers? The books are essentially irrelevant, but I would like to see a paper in a refereed journal presenting evidence of fraud. Or perhaps a court case of charges being brought against someone for such fraud.

After seeing jc456 go back and forth with you, I clicked on SHOW POST of you because you are on my Ignore List for good reason, viz. your reprehensible dishonesty.

1. I have compiled papers, graphs, and data for around 20 years on the global warming fraud. Twenty years.
I have read books by authorities challenging your AlGorian silliness. The first part of the first page of my notes:

Unstoppable Global Warming

Every 1,500 Years

S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery

Rowman & Littlefield

New York

2007

Dedication​

This book is dedicated to those thousands of highly qualified research scientists who have documented physical evidence of the 1,500-year climate cycle from over the entire globe. Hundreds of their studies endorse the reality of this cycle.

Too often, they have had to work in the face of hostility from their colleagues in the climate modeling community who are "selling CO2.

The public has remained virtually unaware that the 1,500-year cycle offers the only explanation for the modern warming that is supported by physical evidence.

Prologue​

Page xii Today, 150 years into the Modern Warming... The ice cores and seabed sediments tell us of six hundred natural 1,500-year climate cycles over the past one million years.

Modern Climate History​

Page xv

1850 to 1940: Warming, especially between 1920 and 1940

1940 to 1975: Cooling trend.

1976 to 1978: Sudden warming spurt

1979 to present: A large disparity...

____________________________________--

THOUSANDS of papers have been published refuting the nonsense you defend so pretentiously, so condescendingly.
THOUSANDS. I cite many hundreds of them here:

theglobalwarmingfraud


Stop your lying. You should be embarrassed, but you Leftists never are. Never.

 

[jc456]

Your last two posts have been incomprehensible.

I’d expect nothing less from you! Condescending is your middle name

 

[otto105]

After seeing jc456 go back and forth with you, I clicked on SHOW POST of you because you are on my Ignore List for good reason, viz. your reprehensible dishonesty.

1. I have compiled papers, graphs, and data for around 20 years on the global warming fraud. Twenty years.
I have read books by authorities challenging your AlGorian silliness. The first part of the first page of my notes:

Unstoppable Global Warming

Every 1,500 Years

S. Fred Singer and Dennis T. Avery

Rowman & Littlefield

New York

2007

Dedication​

This book is dedicated to those thousands of highly qualified research scientists who have documented physical evidence of the 1,500-year climate cycle from over the entire globe. Hundreds of their studies endorse the reality of this cycle.

Too often, they have had to work in the face of hostility from their colleagues in the climate modeling community who are "selling CO2.

The public has remained virtually unaware that the 1,500-year cycle offers the only explanation for the modern warming that is supported by physical evidence.

Prologue​

Page xii Today, 150 years into the Modern Warming... The ice cores and seabed sediments tell us of six hundred natural 1,500-year climate cycles over the past one million years.

Modern Climate History​

Page xv

1850 to 1940: Warming, especially between 1920 and 1940

1940 to 1975: Cooling trend.

1976 to 1978: Sudden warming spurt

1979 to present: A large disparity...

____________________________________--

THOUSANDS of papers have been published refuting the nonsense you defend so pretentiously, so condescendingly.
THOUSANDS. I cite many hundreds of them here:

theglobalwarmingfraud


Stop your lying. You should be embarrassed, but you Leftists never are. Never.

Sure sure, can you post an scientific organization which shares your view of AGW denial?

Ya know, since you do so much reading on the subject.

 

[jc456]

Sure sure, can you post an scientific organization which shares your view of AGW denial?

Ya know, since you do so much reading on the subject.

Name one climate scientist

 

[otto105]

Name one climate scientist

You can read the IPCC report.

 

[ding]

You can read the IPCC report.

Have you?

 

[jc456]

You can read the IPCC report.

Why? Nothing with any evidence in it

 

[otto105]

Why? Nothing with any evidence in it

Posts a guy who read lord muckington...

 

[jc456]

Posts a guy who read lord muckington...

Tough post huh? You Couldn’t find evidence either

 

[otto105]

Tough post huh? You Couldn’t find evidence either

Dude the AGW position literally has ALL the facts on it's side.

You have silly paid for oil money doubt that nobody believes.