If you knew how to use the internet and do web searches you'd have found it.
Here's one recent source;
Staggering climate contradiction - data that can be fudged says "warming," data that cannot be fudged says "no warming"
- Thread starter EMH
- Start date
Here's one recent source;
Look at all those dumb questions.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
Yours ? They are dumb and non sensical…
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
If you knew how to use the internet and do web searches you'd have found it.
Here's one recent source;
And yet, it means nothing. You can’t link it and say where it’s from. “ one recent source”..
wow. Is that better than “ one old source” ?
I offered you perfect climate and me and others want to help you. But you flipped us all off.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
You have no idea of what you are babbling about.
If CO2 has any correspond to temp it is that temp influences the level of CO2, via temp effect on biosphere.
No link, no source, no nothing.
See this ?
Here is a chart, not a map, but a chart.
notice, I provide a link….you can do it too if you have nothing to hide. But you do, so you’re frauds.
Shit, I can flood you with links. I thought you are against links?
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
Perfect climate. You sound like Trump.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
Another lie. I asked for a link for your silly little. MAP
You refused.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
A chart without a link…who knows wtf you’re trying to sayYou have no idea of what you are babbling about.
If CO2 has any correspond to temp it is that temp influences the level of CO2, via temp effect on biosphere.
Wasn't my map asswipe.
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
You kept referring to it. You just did a little while ago…everything looks white and you assumed it was ice…ha ha
Dagosa
Gold Member
- Oct 22, 2012
- 22,594
- 6,162
- 198
I can tell when you’re cornered bubba, the name calling comes out.
Don't be mad because me and others took over Climate from you. You were stinking the place up.
It's a source dipshit, which is what you asked for.
More to the point it's a source, as it states, that revised the math and graph.
Still, you haven't a clue what it expresses/says ...
You described your map fairly well. But it was a Chart. See the ocean all over?
Useless because it shows only @ 80 years versus 4 billion plus.
Concept of context is one of many you fail to grasp.
Says the ass-wipe who started the name-calling on this thread ...
Thank you.
Similar threads
