Global Warming Liars

[ReinyDays]

FUCK ... Chick has me posting things that caused ChemEngineer to take me off ignore ... that sucks ... what an asshole ...

 

[ReinyDays]

How old are you?

And, yes, its 1.1C.

NOAA says 0.8ºC ... LIAR ...

 

[ChemEngineer]

FUCK ... Chick has me posting things that caused ChemEngineer to take me off ignore ... that sucks ... what an asshole ...

Let me correct that right now, Mister Hateful Foul Mouth.

 

[ReinyDays]

Whew ... just something about that poster "liking" my posts that just creeps me out ... I feel cleaner knowing he can't read my posts ...

 

[otto105]

I already told you? Do you believe the laws of radiative forcing changed or something?

When did you post the date?

 

[ReinyDays]

When did you post the date?

"Why do you think another degree of warming will have catastrophic results?" ... do you just avoid disturbing questions or something? ...

 

[Crick]

"Why do you think another degree of warming will have catastrophic results?" ... do you just avoid disturbing questions or something? ...

What's your definition of catastrophe?

 

[ding]

When did you post the date?

Look at the ice core data. You know how to use google, right?

 

[Crick]

When did you post the date?

He's extremely reluctant to actually identify what he's talking about because he knows he'll get shredded. As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.

 

[ding]

He's extremely reluctant to actually identify what he's talking about because he knows he'll get shredded. As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.

So you too are unaware that the previous interglacial cycle had 26ft higher sea levels with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2?

 

[ding]

As I pointed out earlier, you don't determine correlation between trends with a single set of instantaneous parameters.

Why not? Did the radiative forcing of CO2 change?

 

[ReinyDays]

What's your definition of catastrophe?

Four deviations ... just to be safe ...

 

[Crick]

Four deviations ... just to be safe ...

That's a nice safe approach.

 

[otto105]

So you too are unaware that the previous interglacial cycle had 26ft higher sea levels with 120 ppm less atmospheric CO2?

When was that again?

 

[ReinyDays]

When was that again?

At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...

 

[ding]

At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...

No. The previous interglacial cycle. It’s called Eemian.

 

[jc456]

No. The previous interglacial cycle. It’s called Eemian.

and was followed by the most recent glacial period (Weichselian/Wisconsinan)

 

[ReinyDays]

I think I tripped in the Eocene and bloodied my nose ... sorry about that ...

 

[jc456]

The significance, as you've been told before, is due to the speed with which the Earth warmed 1.1C

What happened?

 

[otto105]

At peak interglaciation ... roughly the beginning of the Holocene 10,000 years ago ... that means any effect of global warming would exist in the historical record ... no hypercanes, no hockey sticks ... those who say these will happen are lying ... it's never happen before, it won't happen in the future ...

What was the catalyst for the climate event?