Gerrymandering makes hypocrisy a political punch line

Not if the Texas Mexicans turn on the GOP
What does that have to do with this thread?

In other news... The Republicans in Texas won, the Democrats are returning, and the Republicans may pick up as many as 5 seats.
Not if the Texas Mexicans turn on the GOP. They are red hot about this.
 
Not if the Texas Mexicans turn on the GOP

Not if the Texas Mexicans turn on the GOP. They are red hot about this.

What are you talking about?

They are not stupid. They know the Democrats are the biggest abusers of gerrymandering and allowing children to be raped, sexually enslaved, and human trafficked at the border for the sake of congressional seats and power. They know the Democrats are absolute scumbags.
 
The are unhappy with the Texas GOP.

You're right. They're unhappy that it took the GOP this long to deal with the Democrats having children raped and enslaved at the border by the thousands. To remedy it, they have become more political, changed to Republican affiliation, and are bringing their Catholic family values to the party en masse.

They're straight-up angry at the Democratic Party.
 
You're right. They're unhappy that it took the GOP this long to deal with the Democrats having children raped and enslaved at the border by the thousands. To remedy it, they have become more political, changed to Republican affiliation, and are bringing their Catholic family values to the party en masse.

They're straight-up angry at the Democratic Party.
Nonsense. And they are coming back in droves to the Dems.
 
Nonsense. And they are coming back in droves to the Dems.

You may have bumped your head?

All the polls are showing more and more are leaving, even after the election. Very few Hispanics want to be associated with the Democratic Party that had their relatives' children raped and enslaved. They seem Democrats as scumbags and liars.
 
Hardly. So many of you are sticking with Trump because he like an abusivce parent beating his kids. Do not let trauma bonding take away your freedom of choice.

You may have bumped your head?

All the polls are showing more and more are leaving, even after the election. Very few Hispanics want to be associated with the Democratic Party that had their relatives' children raped and enslaved. They seem Democrats as scumbags and liars.
 
Then why did they offer a bill to end gerrymandering that every single Republican voted against?
So you gerrymander the shit out of the States that you control and THEN you propose a bill to end gerrymandering? Really, Gator?
 
2026 senate electoral map:

View attachment 1147843

Where is the GOP vulnerable?

MI and GA could be GOP pick-ups.
North Carolina is a Dem pick up. Its as close to 100% as you can get.
Susan Collins is toast in Maine.

That's 49/51

Then the Dems would need 2 more to break the VP tie. That is unlikely.
Ohio and Texas are the closest and that doesnt seem possible.

Michigan and GA look easy to me. They will benefit from Trump being at the midterm and the backlash that hits every incumbent party at the midterm.

All just a guess.
 
If that’s true, why is Trump hiding the Epstein evidence?

It could be a number of reasons...

(a) Trump is on the list
(b) Trump is protecting someone(s) on the list
(c) Trump got something for withholding the list
(d) The list (information) has been so deeply corrupted by the Democrats that it cannot be trusted
(e) National Security - Exposing the CIA and/or Mossad
(f) He is protecting ongoing work where they are going to bust current rings and save children
(g) More that one of the above

He told the Obama appointed judge to release it all... they refused. Why is that?
 
It could be a number of reasons...

(a) Trump is on the list
(b) Trump is protecting someone(s) on the list
(c) Trump got something for withholding the list
(d) The list (information) has been so deeply corrupted by the Democrats that it cannot be trusted
(e) National Security - Exposing the CIA and/or Mossad
(f) He is protecting ongoing work where they are going to bust current rings and save children
(g) More that one of the above

He told the Obama appointed judge to release it all... they refused. Why is that?
The judge doesn’t have the evidence, just GJ testimony. You forgot (h) Goalposts moved.
 
The judge doesn’t have the evidence, just GJ testimony. You forgot (h) Goalposts moved.

You don't think there is a ton of information there? What are Democrats afraid of?

Why is it that no Democrats cared about releasing the Epstein evidence while Biden was President?
 
15th post
You don't think there is a ton of information there? What are Democrats afraid of?

Why is it that no Democrats cared about releasing the Epstein evidence while Biden was President?
No there isn’t. The real evidence was on Bondi’s desk.
 
No there isn’t. The real evidence was on Bondi’s desk.

You think Grand Juries are presented no evidence? Is that your position?

You failed to answer my questions, while I answered yours. Why is that?

Why is it that no Democrats cared about releasing the Epstein evidence while Biden was President?
 
They don’t have all the evidence, just the testimony of witnesses called. Trump controls(hides) the real evidence.

They have evidence... again why not release it?

Also, you keep refusing to answer the obvious question..,,,

Why is it that no Democrats cared about releasing the Epstein evidence while Biden was President?
 
Back
Top Bottom