Ending Abortion Is The Next Best Thing To Ending Desegregation

[Biff_Poindexter]

What Is Obergefell v. Hodges? Same-Sex Marriage Could Be Overturned Next

Justice Samuel Alito's reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade might threaten other recently recognized rights, including same-sex marriage.

www.newsweek.com

"The Supreme Court's draft majority opinion document leaked by Politico and published late on Monday evening could overturn 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion rights—and potentially threaten other fundamental rights that have only been recently recognized after years of battling, including same-sex marriages. In the document obtained by Politico, Alito writes that Roe and Casey must be overturned because "the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."

Alito is absolutely right, there is no mention of abortion in the Constitution; therefore there is no reason to believe that these whorish broads have some right to murder their baby under the guise of "right to privacy" -- and the same can be said about many other leftist perversions of the Constitution like sodomy and miscegenation......Yea, its unfortunate that all of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v Wade; had to lie about their positions during Senate hearings, but that's ok because they were lying for freedom....They had to lie because the Satanic leftist media would demonize them for their positions, so they hid their true beliefs....fact is, 95% of the country is against abortion, even in cases of pedophilia-incest-child rape....unless a tranny did it, then abortion is acceptable....


However, after learning the history of how the whole pro-life movement became a thing -- (because it wasn't always a thing) -- I must say that ending abortion is the next best thing to what most of the early pro-life advocates really wanted to end.......DESEGREGATION....Yes, when Conservatives were pissed off that they lost the culture war surrounding desegregation, they adopted a new culture war...abortion....and history has the receipts....

Thereâs a straight line from US racial segregation to the anti-abortion movement | Randall Balmer

Leaders of the religious right would have us believe that Roe v Wade mobilized apolitical Christians. The real story is very different

www.theguardian.com

"Although leaders of the religious right would have us believe that the Roe decision was the catalyst for their political mobilization in the 1970s, that claim does not withstand historical scrutiny. Evangelicals considered abortion a “Catholic issue” through most of the 1970s -- and there is little in the history of evangelicalism to suggest that abortion would become a point of interest. Indeed, in 1971 the Southern Baptist Convention had passed a resolution calling to legalize abortion.

Paul Weyrich, cofounder of the Heritage Foundation and architect of the religious right; tried to make a point to his religious right brethren that the religious right did not come together in response to the Roe decision -- what got the movement going as a political movement was the attempt on the part of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies, including a ban on interracial dating that the university maintained until 2000. He added that he’d been trying since the Goldwater campaign in 1964 to interest evangelicals in politics. Nothing caught their attention, he insisted – school prayer, pornography, equal rights for women, abortion – until the IRS began to challenge the tax exemption of Bob Jones University and other whites-only segregation academies."

So yes, it is some sort of consolation to have won the abortion fight and rejoice in knowing that whores will be punished for their dastardly wicked vaginal decisions....but...it will never be as sweet of a victory like winning the anti-desegregation fight would have been....Fortunately, there are still things one can do at the margins to satisfy that segregation fix...maybe we can revist Brown v Board again...maybe we can successfully overturn that decision if we just rename Brown v Board, CRT instead...maybe we can re-visit whether or not Plessy v Ferguson was actually decided correctly....I mean, technically, there is nothing in the constitution that says states can't decide what is equal and what isn't as it pertains to the treatment of their citizens....example, if these little gay kids want to be loud and proud about being fags, make them go to schools where only fags can go....problem solved...The fight continues...

 

[Moonglow]

I suggest the GOP gets its wish so it can cut education funding.

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

I suggest the GOP gets its wish so it can cut education funding.

My mocking of Conservatives is also my way of forecasting what they will plan to do next....and trust me, trying to return America back to a time before Brown v Board, Loving Vs Virginia, Lawrence Vs Texas --- or as close as they possibly can to it -- will always be at the core of Conservatism.....

 

[Moonglow]

My mocking of Conservatives is also my way of forecasting what they will plan to do next....and trust me, trying to return America back to a time before Brown v Board, Loving Vs Virginia, Lawrence Vs Texas --- or as close as they possibly can to it -- will always be at the core of Conservatism.....

They prefer their separate but equal social form of existence.

 

[Oddball]

80% of Planned Butcherhood clinics are in the parts of town where the most blacks live.

Yeah, racial segregation is next!

 

[Devils_Advocate]

My mocking of Conservatives is also my way of forecasting what they will plan to do next....and trust me, trying to return America back to a time before Brown v Board, Loving Vs Virginia, Lawrence Vs Texas --- or as close as they possibly can to it -- will always be at the core of Conservatism.....

No, it is just you being the typical ass that think one ruling will result in you being put in chains when the reality is the only case that might have a shot being overturned is Gay Marriage and even then I have my doubts on that one but it could happen.

as for outlawing interracial marriages or making you a slave or forcing you to the back of the bus, well that is you being delusional with fear as usual.

Now you will rant about how I want to enslave you and I am a cock sucker and this and that but let be clear you have made wild ass statements about how I do not want Hispanics here while never offering one shred of evidence and if and when you do respond you will proclaim I want slavery and put you in chains while never offering one ounce of evidence to support your asinine comments!

 

[Tommy Tainant]

What Is Obergefell v. Hodges? Same-Sex Marriage Could Be Overturned Next

Justice Samuel Alito's reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade might threaten other recently recognized rights, including same-sex marriage.

www.newsweek.com

"The Supreme Court's draft majority opinion document leaked by Politico and published late on Monday evening could overturn 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion rights—and potentially threaten other fundamental rights that have only been recently recognized after years of battling, including same-sex marriages. In the document obtained by Politico, Alito writes that Roe and Casey must be overturned because "the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."

Alito is absolutely right, there is no mention of abortion in the Constitution; therefore there is no reason to believe that these whorish broads have some right to murder their baby under the guise of "right to privacy" -- and the same can be said about many other leftist perversions of the Constitution like sodomy and miscegenation......Yea, its unfortunate that all of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v Wade; had to lie about their positions during Senate hearings, but that's ok because they were lying for freedom....They had to lie because the Satanic leftist media would demonize them for their positions, so they hid their true beliefs....fact is, 95% of the country is against abortion, even in cases of pedophilia-incest-child rape....unless a tranny did it, then abortion is acceptable....


However, after learning the history of how the whole pro-life movement became a thing -- (because it wasn't always a thing) -- I must say that ending abortion is the next best thing to what most of the early pro-life advocates really wanted to end.......DESEGREGATION....Yes, when Conservatives were pissed off that they lost the culture war surrounding desegregation, they adopted a new culture war...abortion....and history has the receipts....

Thereâs a straight line from US racial segregation to the anti-abortion movement | Randall Balmer

Leaders of the religious right would have us believe that Roe v Wade mobilized apolitical Christians. The real story is very different

www.theguardian.com

"Although leaders of the religious right would have us believe that the Roe decision was the catalyst for their political mobilization in the 1970s, that claim does not withstand historical scrutiny. Evangelicals considered abortion a “Catholic issue” through most of the 1970s -- and there is little in the history of evangelicalism to suggest that abortion would become a point of interest. Indeed, in 1971 the Southern Baptist Convention had passed a resolution calling to legalize abortion.

Paul Weyrich, cofounder of the Heritage Foundation and architect of the religious right; tried to make a point to his religious right brethren that the religious right did not come together in response to the Roe decision -- what got the movement going as a political movement was the attempt on the part of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies, including a ban on interracial dating that the university maintained until 2000. He added that he’d been trying since the Goldwater campaign in 1964 to interest evangelicals in politics. Nothing caught their attention, he insisted – school prayer, pornography, equal rights for women, abortion – until the IRS began to challenge the tax exemption of Bob Jones University and other whites-only segregation academies."

So yes, it is some sort of consolation to have won the abortion fight and rejoice in knowing that whores will be punished for their dastardly wicked vaginal decisions....but...it will never be as sweet of a victory like winning the anti-desegregation fight would have been....Fortunately, there are still things one can do at the margins to satisfy that segregation fix...maybe we can revist Brown v Board again...maybe we can successfully overturn that decision if we just rename Brown v Board, CRT instead...maybe we can re-visit whether or not Plessy v Ferguson was actually decided correctly....I mean, technically, there is nothing in the constitution that says states can't decide what is equal and what isn't as it pertains to the treatment of their citizens....example, if these little gay kids want to be loud and proud about being fags, make them go to schools where only fags can go....problem solved...The fight continues...

Thank you.
I have often wondered why the anti abortion movement never got any traction over here and this sort of explains it. We never had desegregation here because we never had segregation.

Its a bit scary though. What happens in the US generally comes to us a few years later.

All our top tories spend their summers at koch indoctrination centres. Its how they spread the poison.

 

[Penelope]

I suggest the GOP gets its wish so it can cut education funding.

And cut health insurance, all the while there are pg women.

they want to cut the ACA,
do away with medicaid, medicare, and SS.

 

[Thunderbird]

What Is Obergefell v. Hodges? Same-Sex Marriage Could Be Overturned Next

Justice Samuel Alito's reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade might threaten other recently recognized rights, including same-sex marriage.

www.newsweek.com

"The Supreme Court's draft majority opinion document leaked by Politico and published late on Monday evening could overturn 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion rights—and potentially threaten other fundamental rights that have only been recently recognized after years of battling, including same-sex marriages. In the document obtained by Politico, Alito writes that Roe and Casey must be overturned because "the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."

Alito is absolutely right, there is no mention of abortion in the Constitution; therefore there is no reason to believe that these whorish broads have some right to murder their baby under the guise of "right to privacy" -- and the same can be said about many other leftist perversions of the Constitution like sodomy and miscegenation......Yea, its unfortunate that all of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v Wade; had to lie about their positions during Senate hearings, but that's ok because they were lying for freedom....They had to lie because the Satanic leftist media would demonize them for their positions, so they hid their true beliefs....fact is, 95% of the country is against abortion, even in cases of pedophilia-incest-child rape....unless a tranny did it, then abortion is acceptable....


However, after learning the history of how the whole pro-life movement became a thing -- (because it wasn't always a thing) -- I must say that ending abortion is the next best thing to what most of the early pro-life advocates really wanted to end.......DESEGREGATION....Yes, when Conservatives were pissed off that they lost the culture war surrounding desegregation, they adopted a new culture war...abortion....and history has the receipts....

Thereâs a straight line from US racial segregation to the anti-abortion movement | Randall Balmer

Leaders of the religious right would have us believe that Roe v Wade mobilized apolitical Christians. The real story is very different

www.theguardian.com

"Although leaders of the religious right would have us believe that the Roe decision was the catalyst for their political mobilization in the 1970s, that claim does not withstand historical scrutiny. Evangelicals considered abortion a “Catholic issue” through most of the 1970s -- and there is little in the history of evangelicalism to suggest that abortion would become a point of interest. Indeed, in 1971 the Southern Baptist Convention had passed a resolution calling to legalize abortion.

Paul Weyrich, cofounder of the Heritage Foundation and architect of the religious right; tried to make a point to his religious right brethren that the religious right did not come together in response to the Roe decision -- what got the movement going as a political movement was the attempt on the part of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies, including a ban on interracial dating that the university maintained until 2000. He added that he’d been trying since the Goldwater campaign in 1964 to interest evangelicals in politics. Nothing caught their attention, he insisted – school prayer, pornography, equal rights for women, abortion – until the IRS began to challenge the tax exemption of Bob Jones University and other whites-only segregation academies."

So yes, it is some sort of consolation to have won the abortion fight and rejoice in knowing that whores will be punished for their dastardly wicked vaginal decisions....but...it will never be as sweet of a victory like winning the anti-desegregation fight would have been....Fortunately, there are still things one can do at the margins to satisfy that segregation fix...maybe we can revist Brown v Board again...maybe we can successfully overturn that decision if we just rename Brown v Board, CRT instead...maybe we can re-visit whether or not Plessy v Ferguson was actually decided correctly....I mean, technically, there is nothing in the constitution that says states can't decide what is equal and what isn't as it pertains to the treatment of their citizens....example, if these little gay kids want to be loud and proud about being fags, make them go to schools where only fags can go....problem solved...The fight continues...

What the hell are you talking about?

Abortion is a bigot’s best friend.

 

[22lcidw]

And cut health insurance, all the while there are pg women.

they want to cut the ACA,
do away with medicaid, medicare, and SS.

We are slowly getting info on abortions and where they are in some percentages. This is a positive. All these years and no reporting on this. So much more to report on the abortion issue or agenda or industry.

 

[marvin martian]

What Is Obergefell v. Hodges? Same-Sex Marriage Could Be Overturned Next

Justice Samuel Alito's reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade might threaten other recently recognized rights, including same-sex marriage.

www.newsweek.com

"The Supreme Court's draft majority opinion document leaked by Politico and published late on Monday evening could overturn 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion rights—and potentially threaten other fundamental rights that have only been recently recognized after years of battling, including same-sex marriages. In the document obtained by Politico, Alito writes that Roe and Casey must be overturned because "the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."

Alito is absolutely right, there is no mention of abortion in the Constitution; therefore there is no reason to believe that these whorish broads have some right to murder their baby under the guise of "right to privacy" -- and the same can be said about many other leftist perversions of the Constitution like sodomy and miscegenation......Yea, its unfortunate that all of the justices who voted to overturn Roe v Wade; had to lie about their positions during Senate hearings, but that's ok because they were lying for freedom....They had to lie because the Satanic leftist media would demonize them for their positions, so they hid their true beliefs....fact is, 95% of the country is against abortion, even in cases of pedophilia-incest-child rape....unless a tranny did it, then abortion is acceptable....


However, after learning the history of how the whole pro-life movement became a thing -- (because it wasn't always a thing) -- I must say that ending abortion is the next best thing to what most of the early pro-life advocates really wanted to end.......DESEGREGATION....Yes, when Conservatives were pissed off that they lost the culture war surrounding desegregation, they adopted a new culture war...abortion....and history has the receipts....

Thereâs a straight line from US racial segregation to the anti-abortion movement | Randall Balmer

Leaders of the religious right would have us believe that Roe v Wade mobilized apolitical Christians. The real story is very different

www.theguardian.com

"Although leaders of the religious right would have us believe that the Roe decision was the catalyst for their political mobilization in the 1970s, that claim does not withstand historical scrutiny. Evangelicals considered abortion a “Catholic issue” through most of the 1970s -- and there is little in the history of evangelicalism to suggest that abortion would become a point of interest. Indeed, in 1971 the Southern Baptist Convention had passed a resolution calling to legalize abortion.

Paul Weyrich, cofounder of the Heritage Foundation and architect of the religious right; tried to make a point to his religious right brethren that the religious right did not come together in response to the Roe decision -- what got the movement going as a political movement was the attempt on the part of the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) to rescind the tax-exempt status of Bob Jones University because of its racially discriminatory policies, including a ban on interracial dating that the university maintained until 2000. He added that he’d been trying since the Goldwater campaign in 1964 to interest evangelicals in politics. Nothing caught their attention, he insisted – school prayer, pornography, equal rights for women, abortion – until the IRS began to challenge the tax exemption of Bob Jones University and other whites-only segregation academies."

So yes, it is some sort of consolation to have won the abortion fight and rejoice in knowing that whores will be punished for their dastardly wicked vaginal decisions....but...it will never be as sweet of a victory like winning the anti-desegregation fight would have been....Fortunately, there are still things one can do at the margins to satisfy that segregation fix...maybe we can revist Brown v Board again...maybe we can successfully overturn that decision if we just rename Brown v Board, CRT instead...maybe we can re-visit whether or not Plessy v Ferguson was actually decided correctly....I mean, technically, there is nothing in the constitution that says states can't decide what is equal and what isn't as it pertains to the treatment of their citizens....example, if these little gay kids want to be loud and proud about being fags, make them go to schools where only fags can go....problem solved...The fight continues...

^^^Look at the good DemoKKKrat fighting hard to support the 5-to-1 ratio of black abortions to white ones. Sanger would be proud of you!

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

What the hell are you talking about?

Abortion is a bigot’s best friend.

Not really..

I like how you dic suckers pretend to care about black folks tho...


Except, until they are born.....

 

[Biff_Poindexter]

^^^Look at the good DemoKKKrat fighting hard to support the 5-to-1 ratio of black abortions to white ones. Sanger would be proud of you!

How come you don't care about "ALIVE BLACK CHILDREN" instead of celebrating their deaths and demanding every policy that benefits them be cut??


But I am use to Conservatives being full of shit.......how come you couldn't refute the fact that you fake ass right-wingers didn't give a fuck about abortion until your fight against desegregation failed

 

[Sandisk]

What Is Obergefell v. Hodges? Same-Sex Marriage Could Be Overturned Next

Justice Samuel Alito's reasoning behind overturning Roe v. Wade might threaten other recently recognized rights, including same-sex marriage.

www.newsweek.com

"The Supreme Court's draft majority opinion document leaked by Politico and published late on Monday evening could overturn 50 years of constitutional protection for abortion rights—and potentially threaten other fundamental rights that have only been recently recognized after years of battling, including same-sex marriages. In the document obtained by Politico, Alito writes that Roe and Casey must be overturned because "the Constitution makes no reference to abortion, and no such right is implicitly protected by any constitutional provision."

Though I think Roe v. Wade was a lazy law that was doomed to eventual failure.
If you think killing it will permanently end legalized abortions in America?

Well, either you are not thinking straight.
Or you are and you just are not too bright.

 

[marvin martian]

How come you don't care about "ALIVE BLACK CHILDREN" instead of celebrating their deaths and demanding every policy that benefits them be cut??
View attachment 640398

But I am use to Conservatives being full of shit.......how come you couldn't refute the fact that you fake ass right-wingers didn't give a fuck about abortion until your fight against desegregation failed

I do. I don't vote for politicians or policies like the ones in your shithole cities, where blacks are slaughtered every single day. You do that.

 

[Thunderbird]

Not really..

I like how you dic suckers pretend to care about black folks tho...


Except, until they are born.....

So funny when liberals pretend to care about black folk.

American Families Want More School Choice | National Review

Against the COVID-19 backdrop, public debates over school choice have taken on a new sense of urgency.

www.nationalreview.com

 

[EvilCat Breath]

Instead of throwing tantrums just pressure legislatures to pass the damn law.

 

[Blackrook]

This is the stupidest argument for Roe v. Wade ever made. It's not worthy of responding to except to say how stupid it is.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

How come you don't care about "ALIVE BLACK CHILDREN" instead of celebrating their deaths and demanding every policy that benefits them be cut??
View attachment 640398

But I am use to Conservatives being full of shit.......how come you couldn't refute the fact that you fake ass right-wingers didn't give a fuck about abortion until your fight against desegregation failed

Abortion takes the life of an innocent life who has no choice. That's what this should be all about.

As for your claim that conservatives want to cut every "policy" that benefits black kids, consider this, conservatives are in favor of school vouchers and other school choices. You want to see your community lifted up? Then your fucking party should stop fighting (every step of the way) education choices! You guys sit there and allow teachers unions to lead you to the education slaughter.

 

[Blackrook]

Democrats want black women to abort their black babies and oppose school choice so black children are forced to stay in failing public schools where they don't learn how to read or write.