SCOTUS discusses immunity for the President

[Marener]

Plessey was made up hooey, based on the racism of the time.

Roe was made up hooey, based on the court's desire for the issue to go away. The issue didn't go away.

No, abortion is the right you want. Stop trying to deny it.

The issue of abortion didn't go away because conservatives never gave up their authoritarianism like they did after Brown (eventually, it took a while).

 

[martybegan]

Which means your opinion matters not. It's whatever the state decides for you.

Disagree with what the state tells you? No one cares. Submit to the state.

Or what the elected representatives do as per the will of the people.

Like with COVID shots and mask wearing?

 

[martybegan]

The issue of abortion didn't go away because conservatives never gave up their authoritarianism like they did after Brown (eventually, it took a while).

It didn't go away because many people see abortion as wrong. And still do to this day despite attempts otherwise.

 

[Marener]

Or what the elected representatives do as per the will of the people.

Like with COVID shots and mask wearing

Segregation was also the will of the people.

 

[Marener]

It didn't go away because many people see abortion as wrong. And still do to this day despite attempts otherwise.

It didn't go away because people didn't give up their desire to enforce their morality on others.

 

[martybegan]

Segregation was also the will of the people.

And was unconstitutional once the 14th amendment was passed.

A gun ban might be the "will of the people" but is unconstitutional under the 2nd amendment.

 

[martybegan]

It didn't go away because people didn't give up their desire to enforce their morality on others.

Says the lefty who wants to force women to compete with men in sports and allow them into their changing rooms.

 

[Marener]

And was unconstitutional once the 14th amendment was passed.

A gun ban might be the "will of the people" but is unconstitutional under the 2nd amendment.

Plessey pointed out that segregation and integration is not mentioned in the 14th amendment.

You want to hide behind the will of the people when you can use it to attack the undesirables. Very familiar.

 

[Marener]

Says the lefty who wants to force women to compete with men in sports and allow them into their changing rooms.

Of course not. We should have separate but equal accommodations.

 

[martybegan]

Plessey pointed out that segregation and integration is not mentioned in the 14th amendment.

You want to hide behind the will of the people when you can use it to attack the undesirables. Very familiar.

And then wrongly interpreted it to allow for separate but equal. Which was fixed by Brown.

Just like Roe was fixed by Dobbs, and hopefully Chevron is fixed.

Well that last statement is just made up bullshit.

 

[martybegan]

Of course not. We should have separate but equal accommodations.

men pretending to be women are not equal to women. That argument doesn't fly.

 

[surada]

US Supreme Court justices in Trump case lean toward some level of immunity

Conservative U.S. Supreme Court justices signaled sympathy on Thursday to the argument that presidents have some immunity against criminal charges for certain actions taken in office as it heard arguments over Donald Trump's claim of immunity from prosecution for trying to undo his 2020 election...

www.yahoo.com

SCOTUS began questioning each other as to if and how a President or former President could be held to account legally for anything

Here is a taste.

Sauer raised three hypothetical examples of past presidents being charged for officials actions taken as president.

He asked whether George W. Bush could be prosecuted for obstructing an official proceeding for allegedly lying to Congress to justify the Iraq war, or Barack Obama charged with murder for killing U.S. citizens abroad by drone strikes or Biden charged with unlawfully inducing immigrants to enter country illegally, based on his border policies.

"The answer to all these questions is no," Sauer said.


But Trump can be prosecuted for paying money to a whore to keep their affair private or hold Presidential files Biden had as a Senator?

Hilarious!!

Was paying a whore part of Trump's duties as president?

 

[martybegan]

Was paying a whore part of Trump's duties as president?

That case isn't involved here, because it supposedly happened before he was President.

Try to keep up, mouthbreather.

 

[surada]

Or what the elected representatives do as per the will of the people.

Like with COVID shots and mask wearing?

Trump is very proud of the COVID-19 vaccine.

 

[surada]

That case isn't involved here, because it supposedly happened before he was President.

Try to keep up, mouthbreather.

So Trump used campaign funds to clean up his track record for sleazy behavior.

 

[martybegan]

Trump is very proud of the COVID-19 vaccine.

So was Biden, enough to force it on federal workers.

 

[Marener]

And then wrongly interpreted it to allow for separate but equal. Which was fixed by Brown.

Just like Roe was fixed by Dobbs, and hopefully Chevron is fixed.

Well that last statement is just made up bullshit.

As long as it's equal, the 14th amendment.

Only when you extrapolate from the constitution do you reach the conclusion that there are additional rights not specifically enumerated in the constitution that are absolutely necessary.

Like integration.

And abortion.

Dobbs said that you can only extrapolate rights from the constitution when they are deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition. Integration is definitely not deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition, which means by the bullshit opinion in Dobbs, which can mean almost anything if you want it to, Brown would fail.

 

[martybegan]

So Trump used campaign funds to clean up his track record for sleazy behavior.

Nothing illegal about it.

And he used campaign funds?

 

[martybegan]

As long as it's equal, the 14th amendment.

Only when you extrapolate from the constitution do you reach the conclusion that there are additional rights not specifically enumerated in the constitution that are absolutely necessary.

Like integration.

And abortion.

Dobbs said that you can only extrapolate rights from the constitution when they are deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition. Integration is definitely not deeply rooted in the nation's history and tradition, which means by the bullshit opinion in Dobbs, which can mean almost anything if you want it to, Brown would fail.

It was inherently unequal, as Brown rightly decided.

Dobbs said Roe was shit, end of story.

 

[berg80]

Nothing illegal about it.

The grand jury that indicted him disagrees.