- Dec 28, 2011
- 58,519
- 51,857
- 3,600
The point it got ridiculous is when judges ask questions like that without seeing the evidence. There was massive fraud.What can you read from fifteen feet?well I'm factually correct. the judges didn't allow any evidence to be submitted. please, prove me wrong.You’re delusional. Ranting about “ballots that were never received” as if this has any basis in reality.it was not. the ballots never were received to show the fraud. you're incorrect yet again, go fking figure.
When Trump's lawyers took their complaint about election observers being denied sufficient access to watch the processing of ballots, U.S. District Judge Paul Diamond appeared startled when the lawyers then acknowledged that the observers had, in fact, been permitted within 15 feet of the poll workers.
"I'm sorry, then what's your problem?" said Diamond.
Judges want more evidence from Trump campaign as election cases get tossed
President Trump vowed to continue to pursue all legal options.abcnews.go.com
"As part of the lawsuit, the Nevada GOP also attempted to get closer-up access for observers -- similar to demands in Pennsylvania and Michigan. The party's lawyer argued that observers should be close enough to hear everything poll workers were saying. The judge pushed back, asking what they would do if someone was soft-spoken.
"At what point does this get ridiculous?" the judge asked.