Mexico says it will not accept migrants deported by Texas under new state law

[Mac-7]

Thanks for the post COMPLETELY UNRELATED to my comment.

Your objection is noted

But fake asylum seekers scamming the system are not the only problem along the border

America is spending billions of dollars each month to support the migrants and thst is bankrupting the local and federal budget

We cant take care of every needy person that shows up at our border

If President Trump wants to halt the asylum program he will have my full support

 

[Mac-7]

Jesus no wonder the Republicans keep losing. You idiots can’t figure out how to get a win.

Ok. Here is a secret of life. Something your Mommy should have told you. You can’t have it all. You demand all or nothing, a vast majority of the time, you will get nothing.

Let’s pretend for a moment. Trump wins in November. He doesn’t have the supermajority in the Senate. He won’t have a large majority in the house, and that is best case scenario. So he doesn’t get any legislation. He once again tries the executive order bit. You supporters cheer and declare the problem solved, like you did before. The courts put a stop to it and you ignore that because it isn’t published on RW propaganda websites. Nothing changes.

Instead you could make some progress. Perhaps not as much as you want. But some. You reduce the amount of illegals coming in. You streamline the deportation process. And you make some progress. But no. You want it all, and you get nothing.

So immigration will be an issue in 2024. And 2026. And it will still be an issue in 2028. Because even if you win in November. It won’t be by a big enough margin to get what you want. And each month more of those Illegals will become naturalized citizens. And more and more of them will vote.

You had a chance to really make some progress. But you wanted it all. And you were dumb enough to imagine it would work in November.

So the only way you can think opposing the bill was a good thing is if you imagine that a vast majority will come over to your side. So far, nope. Another all or nothing gamble. How have those worked out so far?

I’m sorry that your enormous ego is blinding you to reality

The Senate bill does nothing to halt or even slow down the alien invasion

But it would remove the pressure on lawmakers for a couple of years till voters - maybe even you - figure out that we’ve been scammed again

 

[SavannahMann]

I’m sorry that your enormous ego is blinding you to reality

The Senate bill does nothing to halt or even slow down the alien invasion

But it would remove the pressure on lawmakers for a couple of years till voters - maybe even you - figure out that we’ve been scammed again

Like I said. It’s all or nothing, and you get nothing. Works for me.

 

[Mac-7]

Like I said. It’s all or nothing, and you get nothing. Works for me.

Why not adopt the House bill?

 

[Unkotare]

Starvation is not the only reason a person might seek asylum.

Therefore you can't really tell anything about someone's potential claim for asylum (if any) just by noting that they are overweight.

 

[SavannahMann]

Why not adopt the House bill?

The Senate bill has the advantage of being bipartisan. That means both parties signed off on it.

Compromise means neither side is happy, but they can both live with it. You want to be happy and if you aren’t, nobody will be.

 

[YoursTruly]

I'm white. And I think our government needs to take care of America's problems before they even think about another countries problems.

White Nationalist.

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

The Senate bill has the advantage of being bipartisan. That means both parties signed off on it.

Compromise means neither side is happy, but they can both live with it. You want to be happy and if you aren’t, nobody will be.

The Senate bill has the advantage of being bipartisan. That means both parties signed off on it.

That's awesome! How many Dems voted for it? How many Republicans voted for it?

 

[Toddsterpatriot]

Blacks here in Chicago realize they fucked up.

 

[Mac-7]

The Senate bill has the advantage of being bipartisan. That means both parties signed off on it.

Compromise means neither side is happy, but they can both live with it. You want to be happy and if you aren’t, nobody will be.

Are you saying that

1. Every democrat and every republican senator supported it?

Of course thats not true

2. that republicans in the House must be subservient to the senators?

The House bill is better

The Senate should swallow its pride and follow the House

 

[OKTexas]

They could, if they had the jail space to do that....

Most border crossers would likely take the jail space and take their chance in our courts, than to return home

And what do you think a conviction for felony criminal trespass would do for their chance of staying in the country? This isn't a freaking game.

.

 

[DigitalDrifter]

And as usual, the left on these boards love the fact that our country is being flooded by the third-world.

 

[DudleySmith]

Therefore you can't really tell anything about someone's potential claim for asylum (if any) just by noting that they are overweight.

It means we can dispense with 99.9% of the claims for 'asylum' as merely personal economic reasons and free up the courts for real refugees, dumbass. Now run along and eat some more feces and snivel about Japan getting its ass crushed by FDR.

 

[Unkotare]

It means we can dispense with 99.9% of the claims for 'asylum' as merely personal economic reasons....

No, you can't. And once again, economic reasons are not the only ones upon which an asylum claim may (or may not) be based.

 

[Rambunctious]

Since when did what Mexico says mean shit to us?.... God we need a strong leader again...

 

[DudleySmith]

Since when did what Mexico says mean shit to us?.... God we need a strong leader again...

Seriuosly. They're criminal scum who violate our borders and sovereignty every day for many years.