Conservatism Has Always Been Wrong for Blacks

Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Talk is cheap - actions speak louder than words. Trump did more for blacks in 3 years than Barry did his entire 8 years in office. 100 years later & the party of the KKK still held blacks in economic slavery, which is all Democrats can offer blacks...for their votes.

Barry was just another smooth-talking Democrat who looked like them but still delivered empty promises. Trump's favorability among blacks is currently the highest of any Republican ever....because they are tired of old, white, elitist, self-enriching, racist criminals promising the same old bullshit every election then screwing them the next 4 years.
 
Unfortunately many of them can not see both white foreign and domestic enemies of the state are using them as divisive violent pawns, domestic terrorists to spread violent racial division and violence to help the party of the KKK take back control of the country, plunging it head-long into Socialism where they will still have no better position / status / fortune.
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
..blacks are their own worst enemy--murdering each other at HIGH rates --then blaming whitey and the cops = self destructive cycle
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.

Barry was an eloquent speaker as well...and was still a traitor and the most corrupt / criminal President in US history...
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.

Barry was an eloquent speaker as well...and was still a traitor and the most corrupt / criminal President in US history...

Sorry your post is both silly and wrong.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: IM2
First off, my work ethic shall not be called into question by a member of the race that has been given everything they have by the government.

You can't actually believe this? You think because someone is white they "get everything?" You have to know that is completely untrue.
 
Yet it's commiecrat cities where blacks are warehoused and aren't educated. Go figure.

.
Wrong. There was none of this democrat and republican city shit until trump started making excuses for his failure. Conservatism has always been wrong for blacks and this is why:

"Why the South Must Prevail"

The link is to an editorial by the founder of the conservative movement from the August 24, 1957 issue of National Review,

American conservatism has a fraught relationship with equality, racial or otherwise. But there is a deep legacy in conservative thought of viewing freedom and equality as incompatible—not just in philosophical treatises, but in the day-to-day ideological framing that forms the bread and butter of conservative commentary, from magazines and Fox News to talk radio. In the mid-1960s Harry Jaffa and Frank Meyer engaged in a series of dueling essays in National Review on this question. Meyer, a notorious racist who opposed desegregation, wrote in one of his essays that Jaffa incorrectly “chooses to base his critique of American slavery on the proposition that the American polity is in its essence dedicated to equality.” But “freedom and equality are opposites,” Meyer baldly replied, with a formula that still resonates. “The freer men are the freer they are to demonstrate their inequality.” This is the same basic principle that guided William F. Buckley’s infamous 1957 editorial “Why the South Must Prevail,” in which he argued that, the question “of the rights of American citizens, born Equal” aside, the “White community in the South is entitled to take . . . measures as are necessary to prevail, politically and culturally, in areas in which it does not predominate numerically.” In his 1619 contribution, Jamelle Bouie refers to this very argument of Buckley’s: “It is a strikingly blunt defense of Jim Crow and affirmation of white supremacy from the father of the conservative movement.”

Newt Gingrich, represented a largely white suburban Atlanta district. Gingrich holds a PhD in history from Tulane University; his 1971 dissertation was a full-throated defense of the infamously brutal Belgian colonial record in Congo. On its second page, the future congressman stresses the need for “awareness of the good as well as the bad aspects of colonialism,” suggesting that “the colonial powers performed a painful but positive function in disrupting traditional society” of “the natives.”


The Fragile Patriotism of the American Conservative
.....black communities have always been shitholes--long before Mr Trump--because of blacks murdering blacks
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.

Barry was an eloquent speaker as well...and was still a traitor and the most corrupt / criminal President in US history...

Sorry your post is both silly and wrong.

Denial is an ugly thing to witness. It looks good on you, though.

:p
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.

Barry was an eloquent speaker as well...and was still a traitor and the most corrupt / criminal President in US history...

No, that would be trump.
 
  • Thanks
Reactions: JLW
First off, my work ethic shall not be called into question by a member of the race that has been given everything they have by the government.

You can't actually believe this? You think because someone is white they "get everything?" You have to know that is completely untrue.
I don't think because you're white you have been given everything, the history of the laws and policies of this nation SHOW whites have been given everything.
 
LOL

The OP hates working soooo much that he goes full NAZI to avoid working.........thinks people owe him a living......that others should give up their private possessions to him.........Nothing but a Communist Prick pretending to be righteous............

BLM............BURN LOOT MURDER.
I worked for 43 years. Shut the fuck up.
Being a paid protester doesn't count........Shad up you Racists.........Now RAISE THE FIST like a good little Nazi.
If I was a nazi, I'd be you. Now go on back into your trailer and make that tuna fish sandwich.
Nazi's destroyed anything or anyone who disagrees with them..........Hand salute..type shit...now brain dead left doing the FIST THING..........

You are the Nazi...........own it.
First off, my work ethic shall not be called into question by a member of the race that has been given everything they have by the government. Second it has been shown that white supremacists have been the main ones doing the burning and destroying. So just go on back in your trailer and have a bowl of corn flakes.

You keep perpetuating the myth and the lie that the majority of the burning, looting, murdering, and violence in our cities is being done by white supremacists. Show the empirical data to back it up. You have a sense of entitlement to present what lies between your ears as fact.
 
No, that would be trump.

It is both hilarious and a bit scary how the left buys into all these theories about Trump and completely ignores the obvious corruption in the Obama administration and the Hillary campaign. The left just regurgitates whatever CNN tells them.
 
First off, my work ethic shall not be called into question by a member of the race that has been given everything they have by the government.

You can't actually believe this? You think because someone is white they "get everything?" You have to know that is completely untrue.
I don't think because you're white you have been given everything, the history of the laws and policies of this nation SHOW whites have been given everything.
no, that hasn't been shown
..whites get their stuff by hard work and being able to think
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


Thank you for posting. That was a fascinating. Baldwin was absolutely elegant and powerful in his argument. Your analysis is spot on that the argument of the conservative has not changed much between 1964 and 2020, except maybe it has devolved somewhat. It was an edifying debate.

Barry was an eloquent speaker as well...and was still a traitor and the most corrupt / criminal President in US history...

No, that would be trump.

Your 'nuh-uh' is duly noted...and laughed at.

Barry's administration was officially named the most criminally non-compliant in regards to the FOIA & FRA...his last official act as criminal Commander and Chief was to direct a failed coup attempt to try to overthrow the US govt by removing the newly elected President from office. He should be in Gitmo for that treasonous act alone, one of many crimes he committed as President.
 
Here we see a debate with James Baldwin vs. William Buckley on the issue of race. Buckley was soundly defeated. Buckley's message is still the basic philosophy of conservatism.

James Baldwin Debates William F. Buckley (1965)


That debate was in 1965. So how much have liberal policies REALLY helped the black community since LBJ said we'll have those n*gg*rs voting Democrat for the next hundred years! You got USED, IM2...you were just too myopic to see it happening!

Now you're going to vote in Joe Biden?Biden in 1993 speech pushing crime bill warned of 'predators on our streets' who were 'beyond the pale'
THAT GUY? You've got to be kidding me!
 
I don't think because you're white you have been given everything, the history of the laws and policies of this nation SHOW whites have been given everything.

What do I get because I am white? More interestingly, what do poor white kids from the mountains get? Do they get a free ride into college because they are white?(minority scholarships) Do they get special treatment to get into college(affirmative action) because they are white? Let me guess, they are hired as CEO's, just because they are white. They can walk into any interview wearing a wife beater t-shirt, flashing 2 yellow and brown teeth and land a job, likely in management.
 

Forum List

Back
Top