Congress has already disqualified Trump from the ballot

[Crick]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

 

[Rogue AI]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

Trump was exonerated in his second 'impeachment'. Therefore this 'opinion' is worthless. In fact it creates the opposite conditions you are claiming in regards to the 14th.

 

[Auld Phart]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

An excellent opinion piece

Opinion piece?

That and $20 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks

 

[BlindBoo]

Trump was exonerated in his second 'impeachment'. Therefore this 'opinion' is worthless. In fact it creates the opposite conditions you are claiming in regards to the 14th.

The Senate trial does not absolve him from liability in a criminal court. He is not immune from criminal prosecution.

 

[MarathonMike]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

LMAO at all these "legal eagles" with their asinine interpretations of the Constitution.

 

[Rogue AI]

The Senate trial does not absolve him from liability in a criminal court. He is not immune from criminal prosecution.

It does absolve him of 'insurrection'. He was found not guilty. As to the rest, it is still being corrected through the courts.

 

[Crick]

Trump was exonerated in his second 'impeachment'. Therefore this 'opinion' is worthless. In fact it creates the opposite conditions you are claiming in regards to the 14th.

The majority vote of the House was a finding of fact. The vote in the Senate was a majority. Not the 2/3rds required to convict, but more than enough to meet the requirements of Article 14/3 Read the article for god's sake.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

An excellent opinion piece from Tristan Snell on CNN explains that in the course of Trump's second impeachment, a majority of the House and of the Senate voted that the events of January 6 were an insurrection and that Trump incited it. If the Supreme Court does not obey the clear text of our Constitution, this democracy is at an end.

https://www.cnn.com/2024/02/08/opinions/trump-supreme-court-oral-arguments-election-snell/index.html

This is my thinking.

 

[Crick]

Opinion piece?

That and $20 will get you a cup of coffee at Starbucks

What did you think it would be? A SCOTUS opinion?

 

[BlindBoo]

It does absolve him of 'insurrection'. He was found not guilty. As to the rest, it is still being corrected through the courts.

The Senate is a political body and not part of the Justice System. It doesn't have the authority to absolve him of his crimes.

 

[Auld Phart]

What did you think it would be? A SCOTUS opinion?

it's an opinion, everyone has one.

and like most, it doesn't hold water.

https://media1.giphy.com/media/v1.Y2lkPTc5MGI3NjExdTF1bHk2aDBibjNjbmE4Zmp3dmg0aGk4cmszeTVoZ3o0eGE5YWFtMyZlcD12MV9naWZzX3NlYXJjaCZjdD1n/pSxpnfCYwvvhXjyUMS/giphy.webp

 

[BluesLegend]

Meanwhile Trump is bitch slapping Biden in the polls and marching to the Republican nomination. You Dem pukes will be once again RULED by Trump, deal with it.

 

[WorldWatcher]

Meanwhile Trump is bitch slapping Biden in the polls and marching to the Republican nomination. You Dem pukes will be once again RULED by Trump, deal with it.

#1 Biden has nothing to do with the GOP nomination.

#2 1.1% Points is not "bitch slapping" in anyone's politics.

WW

2024 General Election: Trump vs. Biden Polls | RealClearPolling

Explore poll data on the 2024 General Election between Trump and Biden with RealClearPolling. Uncover trends and gain insight into electoral dynamics for key races and decisive outcomes.

www.realclearpolling.com

 

[BlindBoo]

Resistance is futile.

 

[Crick]

LMAO at all these "legal eagles" with their asinine interpretations of the Constitution.

How do you interpret 14/3?

And just FYI, the author of that piece was Tristan Snell. His CV reads:

Editor’s Note: Tristan Snell is author of the new book “Taking Down Trump: 12 Rules for Prosecuting Donald Trump by Someone Who Did it Successfully.” He is a lawyer and legal commentator who has appeared on MSNBC and CNN, and he served as assistant attorney general for New York State, where he led the investigation of, and civil case against, Trump University.

Assistant AG for the state of New York. How do your qualifications read?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

LMAO at all these "legal eagles" with their asinine interpretations of the Constitution.

Thr SCOTUS seems inclined to the same opinion: it is up to congress.

 

[BS Filter]

LMAO at all these "legal eagles" with their asinine interpretations of the Constitution.

Obama claimed to be a Constitutional professor. Now every democrat believes they are a Constitutional lawyer.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Obama claimed to be a Constitutional professor

No, Harvard University claimed that.

Paid him for it, too.

The irony is, when you balk at this stuff, you are also playing pretend professor.

 

[BS Filter]

No, Harvard University claimed that.

Paid him for it, too.

The irony is, when you balk at this stuff, you are also playing pretend professor.

So you think Obama is a Constitutional lawyer?

 

[BlindBoo]

Obama claimed to be a Constitutional professor. Now every democrat believes they are a Constitutional lawyer.

Whereas Benedict Donald's party conforms to his whims and no longer believes in the US Constitution.