Zone1 Catholics Can Believe in Evolution With only one 'Qualification'. - What is that Qualification?

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Laura Bassi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Nicolas Steno - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Nicolaus Copernicus - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Jean-Baptiste Biot - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Giovanni Alfonso Borelli - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

André-Marie Ampère - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Giuseppe Mercalli - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Jean Buridan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Francesco Maria Grimaldi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Bernard Bolzano - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Pierre André Latreille - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Filippo Brunelleschi - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Mariano Artigas - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Thomas Bradwardine - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Bonaventura Cavalieri - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Nicholas Callan - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Benedetto Castelli - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[ding]

No, it's hardly ever discussed and the reason for that is that it's an embarrassment to most Catholics.

While other Catholics call it heresy and will never accept Darwin's evolution.

What is the 'qualification' that makes it all right? We're only looking for the short answer in less than say 100 words.

Pierre Teilhard de Chardin - Wikipedia

en.wikipedia.org

 

[Mashmont]

No, you've failed to answer the question, but you have at least verified that Catholics are permitted to believe that a day could be any length of time.

So the question still is: You can interpret the bibles the way you like and lthat includes accepting Darwinian evolution.

But there is one necessary qualification to which you must agree and must abide by.

This isn't a trick question. Meriweather or Ding could answer in less than a minute! Isn't the answer obvious?

I don't see any conflict with the Bible words and evolution, and I've said why. I have no idea what you're driving at.

 

[Donald H]

I don't see any conflict with the Bible words and evolution, and I've said why. I have no idea what you're driving at.

The title of this thread should tell you what i'm driving at!