Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Doomer said:
Few of its viewers in the Arab world could mistake al-Jazeera's slant on the "War against Terror." In Egypt, one media commentator has dubbed it "al-Qaeda's satellite channel." Another calls it "the terrorists' mouthpiece." Though exaggerations, they contain a grain of truth.
Part of al-Jazeera's appeal is based on its direct access to important sources. Following U.S. action against al-Qaeda in Afghanistan in late 2001, blurry images of missile strikes were produced by the U.S. military. But only one voice emerged to tell the story from the targets' perspective. At the beginning of the war, al-Jazeera correspondent Tayseer Allouni was the sole international journalist reporting regularly from Taliban-controlled Afghanistan. Indeed, his face competed with prerecorded messages from Osama bin Laden for air time throughout the world.
Allouni reported on the mood in Kabul. Paula Zahn interviewed him on CNN. His demeanor was well-suited to a Western audience. But the question remains: Why was he the only reporter who the Taliban government allowed in the capital? It is curious that as soon as the Taliban left Kabul, Allouni left as well. Later, he was the subject of allegations connected to the Madrid bombings of March 11, and forbidden to leave Spain. Yet he continues to report for al-Jazeera to this day.
Allouni's access to the Taliban can only be compared to that of his colleague, Ahmed Mansour, who has access to the Zarqawi terrorist group in Iraq. Or his other colleague, Faisal al-Qasim, who, according to credible reports, worked for Iraqi intelligence under Saddam Hussein.
Kathianne said:I've heard about some of these ties, but this article kinda pulls it all together:
http://www.canada.com/national/nati...d=3b6475ba-9e24-46b4-9d54-84060206e325&page=1
Excerpt:
greeneyez1029 said:As a Canadian myself I find it very disturbing that we will air Al Jazera and not Fox news. We are banning one and censoring the other..So much for a free Liberal country...No wonder the U.S. looks at us with a raised eyebrow..
Kathianne said:Welcome Greeneyez1029! We don't look at Canadians with raised eyebrows, just their choice in media!
greeneyez1029 said:Thanks Kathianne, some are looking at us like that and I can honestly say that I don't blame them one bit..Ontario itself has been described as now following Sharia Law...The whole idea of multiculturalism isn't necessarily a bad thing, but it's getting way out of hand here...
Kathianne said:Well the Sharia Law is troubling...
greeneyez1029 said:Very much so, this religion (Islam) is as scary as all get out. I started reading up on it a couple of months ago and it just floors me that people actually follow this faith. It's very violent and unforgiving...
Kathianne said:Oh especially for women. Perhaps more troubling is our neighbor's incorporating it regarding their application of laws. That is scary. :scratch:
greeneyez1029 said:Here, here!!!! Alot of Canadian's are getting fed up with it. I know speaking for my own mother and myself we would not fare well under that faith..LOL way to lippy for our own good...
Kathianne said:No doubt our nations are different, but have traditionally seen threats and responses the same. It's very confusing what has happened there.
greeneyez1029 said:Oh that's easy, we call them the FIBERALS!! Our military is almost non existant due to their policies.. So long as liberals are in power here and the only reason they are is because they recieve all the immigrant votes they will always go against any right wing policies that the U.S. puts forth.
Kathianne said:So they are willing to go Islamic direction, just to oppose the US? Seems suicidal to me.
Kathianne said:So they are willing to go Islamic direction, just to oppose the US? Seems suicidal to me.