Buddhists burn down Mosque and hand out death sentences

[Lucy Hamilton]

The Muslim minority in Burma are among the most viciously persecuted minorities in the world (#1 according to Amnesty International), and it's been going on for nearly a thousand years.

Amnesty International demonizes and attack Israel so Amnesty International is dismissed as a Liberal hack group. And by extension, so is your comment.

Amnesty International are a Far Left organisation who support terrorists.

 

[HUGGY]

Do you trust the Myanmar courts to be fair in this?

If you rape and murder, then you deserve to be executed. We can't excuse rape and murder, or can we, if it's Muslims who are doing it?

If this crime occured in your country or mine, I'd agree. Mostly, we have decent and impartial justice systems. Crimes are investigated. People get a fair trial. We have mechanisms to fight corruption and to appeal. We don't just pick people up off the streets and charge them because we don't like them (or, at least not often). Do you think that happens in Myanmar? Do you think it happens in North Korea? How about Iran?

Lucy, have you read what Myanmar does to it's people?

We could mention Thailand hanging drug dealers, I don't think that the Thai human rights situation is so great, so what am I supposed to say that because of that, the Thai authorities should just treat drug dealers with kid gloves?

UUUMMMmmmmmm..??? Hanging is kinda an extreme punishment don't you think? Anything less is "kid gloves"? That's barbaric.

Huh?

You think people that sell drugs should be hanged?

 

[Coyote]

I also think the problem in Lebenon is not with Muslims in general, but extremists and hezbolla.

Who's the bigger threat to Western Civilisation, Buddhists or Radical Islam?

Of course not all Muslims are of the crazy type, but the fundamental problem is that too many of the Muslim males, and often the Muslim females between the ages of 15 years-old and 25 years-old are very prone to being Radicalised.

Coyote will now say christianity is the biggest threat. She will guise it under the old "all religions" claim.

The thing is, the pro-Islam people, they say that not all Muslims are Radical Muslims, which of course, we already are aware of this.

It'd be ridiculous to suggest that every Muslim on the planet wants to start shooting, stabbing and blowing people up.

What the pro-Islam people say though, this is that we just should concentrate on the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims, and effectively just ignore the elephant in the room, this is a very dangerous road to decide to travel upon. That we should ignore Radical Islam and just get happy clappy and have a big love-in with the other Muslims, which is predominantly what the Leftists are doing and have been doing for a considerable amount of time, a heads in the sand situation.

People like me prefer to ignore the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims and instead put the entire onus ON Radical Islam.

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism. But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

If you rape and murder, then you deserve to be executed. We can't excuse rape and murder, or can we, if it's Muslims who are doing it?

If this crime occured in your country or mine, I'd agree. Mostly, we have decent and impartial justice systems. Crimes are investigated. People get a fair trial. We have mechanisms to fight corruption and to appeal. We don't just pick people up off the streets and charge them because we don't like them (or, at least not often). Do you think that happens in Myanmar? Do you think it happens in North Korea? How about Iran?

Lucy, have you read what Myanmar does to it's people?

We could mention Thailand hanging drug dealers, I don't think that the Thai human rights situation is so great, so what am I supposed to say that because of that, the Thai authorities should just treat drug dealers with kid gloves?

UUUMMMmmmmmm..??? Hanging is kinda an extreme punishment don't you think? Anything less is "kid gloves"? That's barbaric.

Huh?

You think people that sell drugs should be hanged?

I'm sorry I have no desire to respond to your type, I've read your other comments and they're devoid of all logic, you're a typical Left Wing bedwetter.

You can't even understand that I said I'm 100% pro-Death Penalty, you respond with:

"You think people that sell drugs should be hanged?"

Hanged or whatever else, people who sell drugs should be executed yes, along with rapists, murderers and paedophiles.

Now you can just go on ignore, considering other comments of yours that I've read are not too different from your ones in this thread, I don't waste time anymore on this stuff, I prefer at least a reasonably intelligent discussion with either Left or Liberal or whatever.

 

[Brynmr]

Look it up for yourself: Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

​

I rely on an actual dictionary, not some website where the content is manipulated.

Dismissed.​

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

I also think the problem in Lebenon is not with Muslims in general, but extremists and hezbolla.

Who's the bigger threat to Western Civilisation, Buddhists or Radical Islam?

Of course not all Muslims are of the crazy type, but the fundamental problem is that too many of the Muslim males, and often the Muslim females between the ages of 15 years-old and 25 years-old are very prone to being Radicalised.

Coyote will now say christianity is the biggest threat. She will guise it under the old "all religions" claim.

The thing is, the pro-Islam people, they say that not all Muslims are Radical Muslims, which of course, we already are aware of this.

It'd be ridiculous to suggest that every Muslim on the planet wants to start shooting, stabbing and blowing people up.

What the pro-Islam people say though, this is that we just should concentrate on the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims, and effectively just ignore the elephant in the room, this is a very dangerous road to decide to travel upon. That we should ignore Radical Islam and just get happy clappy and have a big love-in with the other Muslims, which is predominantly what the Leftists are doing and have been doing for a considerable amount of time, a heads in the sand situation.

People like me prefer to ignore the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims and instead put the entire onus ON Radical Islam.

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism. But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

We have to agree to disagree.

The Leftists in general aren't trying to concentrate on extremism, most times they refuse to even acknowledge Radical Islam, the Orlando shooter is the latest example.

The Leftists in general just want to talk about anything BUT Radical Islam, it's why we have the myriad of deflections each time a thread on the topic of Radical Islam occurs, it's the Christians, it's the Conservatives, it's What About The Crusades, it's What About The Anti-Abortion Crowd, it's OMG What About The Westboro Baptist lunatics etc it's EVERYTHING BUT About Radical Islam, because in the Leftist mind in general there is NO Radical Islam but lots and lots of fluffy stuff about we should just understand them a bit more and Loretta Lynch suggests everyone needs to just show them some more love and then everything can be wrapped up in pretty paper with a beautiful bow on top.

 

[Coyote]

yea, once yo have pissed off buddist to the point of riots, you need to take a long hard look at yourself.

the sentencing was done by the state though, not some buddist mock trial.


and really, if islam was the religion of peace, the ME would be the most peaceful place on earth and a region that would be copied throughout the world

Yes. This has been happening more and more over the last decade. They know exactly what happens when Muslims get close to a majority in a country; they take it over and butcher everybody that resists and rob those left alive. 'Moderate' Muslims of course are happy to enable this process, as usual.

The UN is a cesspool of demented psychotics, organized crime syndicates, mass murderers, and thieves. The U.S. needs to stop funding the scum.

As for Bangledesh, they are a Muslim country, yet they won't take in Muslim refugees. Muslim countries won't take Muslim refugees, so why should anybody else? They aren't 'refugees' from anything but themselves.

Where are the resident hacks to lecture us on how bigoted these Buddhists are?

Coyote will be along - she has defended the Muslims and condemned the Buddhists in this particular ongoing conflict before - not exactly surprising, eh?

That, from a woman who agrees with a post calling for nuking Muslim children because they might already be indoctrinated as young as 5 and is now getting her jollies off Rohinga being killed. After all, they're just Muslims right Tilly?

Lol. And here you are, lying again, right on cue. I did not agree with Lucy calling for the nuking of anybody, let alone children, as you well know.
So again, for the record, I don't want any Muslims anywhere to be nuked, and I don't want Muslim children to be nuked. In fact, I don't want anyone, anywhere, period, to be nuked. I hope this clears up your confusion, Coyote.
Now, instead of repeatedly lying about me agreeing or thanking a post, why don't you take to task the person who actually wrote the post advocating nuking children?
Here's why, because not only are you an incessant liar and a rabid supporter of Islamic extremists, you are also a coward and a huge hypocrite too, who gives a pass to someone who advocates nuking children whilst lying about someone who clearly doesn't. Lol.
Yep, supremely hypocritical and cowardly Now let's see you take to task the person who actually called for nuking Muslim children

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

 

[koshergrl]

yea, once yo have pissed off buddist to the point of riots, you need to take a long hard look at yourself.

the sentencing was done by the state though, not some buddist mock trial.


and really, if islam was the religion of peace, the ME would be the most peaceful place on earth and a region that would be copied throughout the world

Yes. This has been happening more and more over the last decade. They know exactly what happens when Muslims get close to a majority in a country; they take it over and butcher everybody that resists and rob those left alive. 'Moderate' Muslims of course are happy to enable this process, as usual.

The UN is a cesspool of demented psychotics, organized crime syndicates, mass murderers, and thieves. The U.S. needs to stop funding the scum.

As for Bangledesh, they are a Muslim country, yet they won't take in Muslim refugees. Muslim countries won't take Muslim refugees, so why should anybody else? They aren't 'refugees' from anything but themselves.

Coyote will be along - she has defended the Muslims and condemned the Buddhists in this particular ongoing conflict before - not exactly surprising, eh?

That, from a woman who agrees with a post calling for nuking Muslim children because they might already be indoctrinated as young as 5 and is now getting her jollies off Rohinga being killed. After all, they're just Muslims right Tilly?

Lol. And here you are, lying again, right on cue. I did not agree with Lucy calling for the nuking of anybody, let alone children, as you well know.
So again, for the record, I don't want any Muslims anywhere to be nuked, and I don't want Muslim children to be nuked. In fact, I don't want anyone, anywhere, period, to be nuked. I hope this clears up your confusion, Coyote.
Now, instead of repeatedly lying about me agreeing or thanking a post, why don't you take to task the person who actually wrote the post advocating nuking children?
Here's why, because not only are you an incessant liar and a rabid supporter of Islamic extremists, you are also a coward and a huge hypocrite too, who gives a pass to someone who advocates nuking children whilst lying about someone who clearly doesn't. Lol.
Yep, supremely hypocritical and cowardly Now let's see you take to task the person who actually called for nuking Muslim children

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

 

[Michelle420]

Buddhists aren't above fighting, look at Vietnam.

Buddhists are allowed (under the tenets of scripture) to defend themselves. This is what they are doing here. Any Buddhist engaged in offensive violence is doing so without scriptural authority.

Makes no sense. In Buddhist practice letting go of attachments. Attachments to material things and attachments to ego, attachments to outcomes.

Attachment

 

[Coyote]

Look it up for yourself: Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

​

I rely on an actual dictionary, not some website where the content is manipulated.

Dismissed.​

I also think the problem in Lebenon is not with Muslims in general, but extremists and hezbolla.

Who's the bigger threat to Western Civilisation, Buddhists or Radical Islam?

Of course not all Muslims are of the crazy type, but the fundamental problem is that too many of the Muslim males, and often the Muslim females between the ages of 15 years-old and 25 years-old are very prone to being Radicalised.

Coyote will now say christianity is the biggest threat. She will guise it under the old "all religions" claim.

The thing is, the pro-Islam people, they say that not all Muslims are Radical Muslims, which of course, we already are aware of this.

It'd be ridiculous to suggest that every Muslim on the planet wants to start shooting, stabbing and blowing people up.

What the pro-Islam people say though, this is that we just should concentrate on the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims, and effectively just ignore the elephant in the room, this is a very dangerous road to decide to travel upon. That we should ignore Radical Islam and just get happy clappy and have a big love-in with the other Muslims, which is predominantly what the Leftists are doing and have been doing for a considerable amount of time, a heads in the sand situation.

People like me prefer to ignore the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims and instead put the entire onus ON Radical Islam.

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism. But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

We have to agree to disagree.

The Leftists in general aren't trying to concentrate on extremism, most times they refuse to even acknowledge Radical Islam, the Orlando shooter is the latest example.

The Leftists in general just want to talk about anything BUT Radical Islam, it's why we have the myriad of deflections each time a thread on the topic of Radical Islam occurs, it's the Christians, it's the Conservatives, it's What About The Crusades, it's What About The Anti-Abortion Crowd, it's OMG What About The Westboro Baptist lunatics etc it's EVERYTHING BUT About Radical Islam, because in the Leftist mind in general there is NO Radical Islam but lots and lots of fluffy stuff about we should just understand them a bit more and Loretta Lynch suggests everyone needs to just show them some more love and then everything can be wrapped up in pretty paper with a beautiful bow on top.

I don't mind agreeing to disagree...but I'll say this. Perhaps the far left and the far right have something in common. The far left thinks there is NO Radical Islam, just lots of fluffy stuff while the Far Right thinks there is NO Radical Islam because Radical Islam IS Islam.

Neither view is helpful because one ignores the real dangers of extremism and the other ignores the fact that extremism doesn't define the religion.

 

[Coyote]

yea, once yo have pissed off buddist to the point of riots, you need to take a long hard look at yourself.

the sentencing was done by the state though, not some buddist mock trial.


and really, if islam was the religion of peace, the ME would be the most peaceful place on earth and a region that would be copied throughout the world

Yes. This has been happening more and more over the last decade. They know exactly what happens when Muslims get close to a majority in a country; they take it over and butcher everybody that resists and rob those left alive. 'Moderate' Muslims of course are happy to enable this process, as usual.

The UN is a cesspool of demented psychotics, organized crime syndicates, mass murderers, and thieves. The U.S. needs to stop funding the scum.

As for Bangledesh, they are a Muslim country, yet they won't take in Muslim refugees. Muslim countries won't take Muslim refugees, so why should anybody else? They aren't 'refugees' from anything but themselves.

That, from a woman who agrees with a post calling for nuking Muslim children because they might already be indoctrinated as young as 5 and is now getting her jollies off Rohinga being killed. After all, they're just Muslims right Tilly?

Lol. And here you are, lying again, right on cue. I did not agree with Lucy calling for the nuking of anybody, let alone children, as you well know.
So again, for the record, I don't want any Muslims anywhere to be nuked, and I don't want Muslim children to be nuked. In fact, I don't want anyone, anywhere, period, to be nuked. I hope this clears up your confusion, Coyote.
Now, instead of repeatedly lying about me agreeing or thanking a post, why don't you take to task the person who actually wrote the post advocating nuking children?
Here's why, because not only are you an incessant liar and a rabid supporter of Islamic extremists, you are also a coward and a huge hypocrite too, who gives a pass to someone who advocates nuking children whilst lying about someone who clearly doesn't. Lol.
Yep, supremely hypocritical and cowardly Now let's see you take to task the person who actually called for nuking Muslim children

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

Where?

 

[koshergrl]

yea, once yo have pissed off buddist to the point of riots, you need to take a long hard look at yourself.

the sentencing was done by the state though, not some buddist mock trial.


and really, if islam was the religion of peace, the ME would be the most peaceful place on earth and a region that would be copied throughout the world

Yes. This has been happening more and more over the last decade. They know exactly what happens when Muslims get close to a majority in a country; they take it over and butcher everybody that resists and rob those left alive. 'Moderate' Muslims of course are happy to enable this process, as usual.

The UN is a cesspool of demented psychotics, organized crime syndicates, mass murderers, and thieves. The U.S. needs to stop funding the scum.

As for Bangledesh, they are a Muslim country, yet they won't take in Muslim refugees. Muslim countries won't take Muslim refugees, so why should anybody else? They aren't 'refugees' from anything but themselves.

Lol. And here you are, lying again, right on cue. I did not agree with Lucy calling for the nuking of anybody, let alone children, as you well know.
So again, for the record, I don't want any Muslims anywhere to be nuked, and I don't want Muslim children to be nuked. In fact, I don't want anyone, anywhere, period, to be nuked. I hope this clears up your confusion, Coyote.
Now, instead of repeatedly lying about me agreeing or thanking a post, why don't you take to task the person who actually wrote the post advocating nuking children?
Here's why, because not only are you an incessant liar and a rabid supporter of Islamic extremists, you are also a coward and a huge hypocrite too, who gives a pass to someone who advocates nuking children whilst lying about someone who clearly doesn't. Lol.
Yep, supremely hypocritical and cowardly Now let's see you take to task the person who actually called for nuking Muslim children

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

Where?

No thank you. Last time I pointed it out, you zapped me. You're cute.

 

[koshergrl]

Look it up for yourself: Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

​

I rely on an actual dictionary, not some website where the content is manipulated.

Dismissed.​

Who's the bigger threat to Western Civilisation, Buddhists or Radical Islam?

Of course not all Muslims are of the crazy type, but the fundamental problem is that too many of the Muslim males, and often the Muslim females between the ages of 15 years-old and 25 years-old are very prone to being Radicalised.

Coyote will now say christianity is the biggest threat. She will guise it under the old "all religions" claim.

The thing is, the pro-Islam people, they say that not all Muslims are Radical Muslims, which of course, we already are aware of this.

It'd be ridiculous to suggest that every Muslim on the planet wants to start shooting, stabbing and blowing people up.

What the pro-Islam people say though, this is that we just should concentrate on the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims, and effectively just ignore the elephant in the room, this is a very dangerous road to decide to travel upon. That we should ignore Radical Islam and just get happy clappy and have a big love-in with the other Muslims, which is predominantly what the Leftists are doing and have been doing for a considerable amount of time, a heads in the sand situation.

People like me prefer to ignore the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims and instead put the entire onus ON Radical Islam.

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism. But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

We have to agree to disagree.

The Leftists in general aren't trying to concentrate on extremism, most times they refuse to even acknowledge Radical Islam, the Orlando shooter is the latest example.

The Leftists in general just want to talk about anything BUT Radical Islam, it's why we have the myriad of deflections each time a thread on the topic of Radical Islam occurs, it's the Christians, it's the Conservatives, it's What About The Crusades, it's What About The Anti-Abortion Crowd, it's OMG What About The Westboro Baptist lunatics etc it's EVERYTHING BUT About Radical Islam, because in the Leftist mind in general there is NO Radical Islam but lots and lots of fluffy stuff about we should just understand them a bit more and Loretta Lynch suggests everyone needs to just show them some more love and then everything can be wrapped up in pretty paper with a beautiful bow on top.

I don't mind agreeing to disagree...but I'll say this. Perhaps the far left and the far right have something in common. The far left thinks there is NO Radical Islam, just lots of fluffy stuff while the Far Right thinks there is NO Radical Islam because Radical Islam IS Islam.

Neither view is helpful because one ignores the real dangers of extremism and the other ignores the fact that extremism doesn't define the religion.

Extremism DOES define their religion. Look at any country that is defined by their religion, and you will find a country that is defined by violent extremism.

 

[Coyote]

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

Where?

No thank you. Last time I pointed it out, you zapped me. You're cute.

In other words - nothing. That's what I thought.

 

[koshergrl]

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

Where?

No thank you. Last time I pointed it out, you zapped me. You're cute.

In other words - nothing. That's what I thought.

You don't think, Coyote. And anybody who goes to the cdz can see your garbage there.

 

[Lucy Hamilton]

Look it up for yourself: Racism - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia

​

I rely on an actual dictionary, not some website where the content is manipulated.

Dismissed.​

Who's the bigger threat to Western Civilisation, Buddhists or Radical Islam?

Of course not all Muslims are of the crazy type, but the fundamental problem is that too many of the Muslim males, and often the Muslim females between the ages of 15 years-old and 25 years-old are very prone to being Radicalised.

Coyote will now say christianity is the biggest threat. She will guise it under the old "all religions" claim.

The thing is, the pro-Islam people, they say that not all Muslims are Radical Muslims, which of course, we already are aware of this.

It'd be ridiculous to suggest that every Muslim on the planet wants to start shooting, stabbing and blowing people up.

What the pro-Islam people say though, this is that we just should concentrate on the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims, and effectively just ignore the elephant in the room, this is a very dangerous road to decide to travel upon. That we should ignore Radical Islam and just get happy clappy and have a big love-in with the other Muslims, which is predominantly what the Leftists are doing and have been doing for a considerable amount of time, a heads in the sand situation.

People like me prefer to ignore the Muslims who aren't Radical Muslims and instead put the entire onus ON Radical Islam.

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism. But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

We have to agree to disagree.

The Leftists in general aren't trying to concentrate on extremism, most times they refuse to even acknowledge Radical Islam, the Orlando shooter is the latest example.

The Leftists in general just want to talk about anything BUT Radical Islam, it's why we have the myriad of deflections each time a thread on the topic of Radical Islam occurs, it's the Christians, it's the Conservatives, it's What About The Crusades, it's What About The Anti-Abortion Crowd, it's OMG What About The Westboro Baptist lunatics etc it's EVERYTHING BUT About Radical Islam, because in the Leftist mind in general there is NO Radical Islam but lots and lots of fluffy stuff about we should just understand them a bit more and Loretta Lynch suggests everyone needs to just show them some more love and then everything can be wrapped up in pretty paper with a beautiful bow on top.

I don't mind agreeing to disagree...but I'll say this. Perhaps the far left and the far right have something in common. The far left thinks there is NO Radical Islam, just lots of fluffy stuff while the Far Right thinks there is NO Radical Islam because Radical Islam IS Islam.

Neither view is helpful because one ignores the real dangers of extremism and the other ignores the fact that extremism doesn't define the religion.

No Radical Islam ISN'T Islam, however there's too much within Islam that makes it very susceptible to becoming Radical and that's the problem when you have a 7th Century religious and political philosophy that hasn't been modernised and remains as it was in the 7th Century.

Islam ISN'T JUST a religion, it's a full-spectrum political philosophy, this is the other thing that many people choose to ignore, it's also why Islam is unique and cannot in any shape or form be compared to other religions, be they Christianity, Judaism or Buddhism etc.

 

[Brynmr]

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism.

Nonsense. They're shills for Islam - excusing this terrible "religion" at every turn.

But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

I for one claim the Islamic doctrine is an evil doctrine. Don't assume I cannot defend this position. I assure you I can and have on many occasions. I also claim that EVERY Moslem supports this doctrine therefore every Moslem supports evil whether they know it or not - whether they want to or not. This is just common sense. This is not a canard.

People are continuously falling over themselves saying that not all Moslems are terrorists. The only canard here is the one coming from you.

 

[Coyote]

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

Where?

No thank you. Last time I pointed it out, you zapped me. You're cute.

The reason you got zapped was for discussing moderation on the open boards, not for providing a link to your claim. You're no newby KG, you know the rules. Even Tilly, and we quite clearly dislike each other, can tell you I've never "zapped" her.

 

[Tilly]

yea, once yo have pissed off buddist to the point of riots, you need to take a long hard look at yourself.

the sentencing was done by the state though, not some buddist mock trial.


and really, if islam was the religion of peace, the ME would be the most peaceful place on earth and a region that would be copied throughout the world

Yes. This has been happening more and more over the last decade. They know exactly what happens when Muslims get close to a majority in a country; they take it over and butcher everybody that resists and rob those left alive. 'Moderate' Muslims of course are happy to enable this process, as usual.

The UN is a cesspool of demented psychotics, organized crime syndicates, mass murderers, and thieves. The U.S. needs to stop funding the scum.

As for Bangledesh, they are a Muslim country, yet they won't take in Muslim refugees. Muslim countries won't take Muslim refugees, so why should anybody else? They aren't 'refugees' from anything but themselves.

That, from a woman who agrees with a post calling for nuking Muslim children because they might already be indoctrinated as young as 5 and is now getting her jollies off Rohinga being killed. After all, they're just Muslims right Tilly?

Lol. And here you are, lying again, right on cue. I did not agree with Lucy calling for the nuking of anybody, let alone children, as you well know.
So again, for the record, I don't want any Muslims anywhere to be nuked, and I don't want Muslim children to be nuked. In fact, I don't want anyone, anywhere, period, to be nuked. I hope this clears up your confusion, Coyote.
Now, instead of repeatedly lying about me agreeing or thanking a post, why don't you take to task the person who actually wrote the post advocating nuking children?
Here's why, because not only are you an incessant liar and a rabid supporter of Islamic extremists, you are also a coward and a huge hypocrite too, who gives a pass to someone who advocates nuking children whilst lying about someone who clearly doesn't. Lol.
Yep, supremely hypocritical and cowardly Now let's see you take to task the person who actually called for nuking Muslim children

Cowardly....from a person who spends an inordinate amount of time stalking other members just so she can post a smiie on their posts rather than engage in discussion? It's hilarious, because most folks stick to a few here and there (it makes a better point that way, otherwise you come off as a passive aggressive ****).

Maybe, instead of running around agreeing with idiotic posts that one can only assume reflect your own inner attitudes - how about doing a bit of research on the topic, like what is going on in Myanmar instead of automatically supporting atrocities because the victims are Muslims? If it were Christians, what would your attitude be? Well, there are Christians being persecuted by your beloved Buddhists - it's not quite as bad as the Rohinga (at least they haven't YET been stripped of citizenship, forced into concentration camps, dependent entirely on what little foriegn aid the government allows them).

But, the Buddhists are so very tolerant aren't they?

When attitudes like yours (variations on "the victims deserve everything they get" because you don't like their faith) prevail, it's only short step from supporting genocidal rhetoric or actual genocide. With people like you applauding the massacres of innocent people from one side or the other it's no wonder these conflicts never end.

Innocent people are innocent people - whether it's a 13 yr old Jewish girl knifed to death while she slept in the West Bank or a Muslim child burned alive by a Buddhist mob - they don't deserve it. They didn't do anything to deserve except belong to the wrong ethnicity or religion. That's what you are supporting when you agree with Myanmar "justice" and their attitudes towards Muslims - it's no different then those agreeing with Palestinian murderers - and I'm sure they use the same rationale that you do...the victims, by virtue of their religion alone deserved it. That is what this thread is really about you vapid cow.

If you don't like having your idiotic pro Islamist crap funnied, you should probably have thought twice before endlessly doing that to my posts and to those of many other posters ( even in the CDZ ) who see right through the utterly desperate pro Islamist garbage you spew 24/7.
Your pro Islamist crap does not warrant a response, nor does it even warrant reading any more, as it's the same old pro Islamist propaganda repeated over and over ad nauseum, all over the boards - it's laughable So, here's how it is, your desperate efforts on behalf of Islamism no longer even deserve the little time it takes to read them, but they most certainly do warrant funnies and dumb ratings, so that's what you get. Thanks for admitting it bugs you though, that's good to know. Lol

I don't think I've ever done it in CDZ, so that's a lie right there...but it certainly seems to irritate you. You have mocked in CDZ- even though you whined big time in the thread devoted to it until someone exposed you as a hypocrite with a screen shot Thanks for the reminder

In the meantime, I have no desire to waste time anymore on you either - a person who agrees with killing innocent people because they happen to be Muslim or seems to think that Myanmar is doing the "right thing" is simply not very "funny" any more. Not at all.

Yes, you have done it in the cdz. So that's a lie right there.

She's done so much lying for Islam she doesn't know how not to be dishonest now.
Instead of falling for the bait, anyone who wants to see Coyotes funnies to serious posts in the CDZ just need to head over there and take a look for themselves.

 

[Coyote]

That is pretty much what leftists are trying to do as well - concentrate on extremism.

Nonsense. They're shills for Islam - excusing this terrible "religion" at every turn.

But when people broadbrush Muslims as a whole with canards, then it's not putting the onus on radicals, it's smearing the entire group.

I for one claim the Islamic doctrine is an evil doctrine. Don't assume I cannot defend this position. I assure you I can and have on many occasions. I also claim that EVERY Moslem supports this doctrine therefore every Moslem supports evil whether they know it or not - whether they want to or not. This is just common sense. This is not a canard.

People are continuously falling over themselves saying that not all Moslems are terrorists. The only canard here is the one coming from you.

Perfect example of the Far Right