Breaking: Woman shot while trying to kill ICE agents in Minnesota

[playtime]

Screaming in my face and running your car into me isn’t peaceful

'cept, she saud quite calmly & smiled as she said she wasn't mad at him. she backed up & had her wheels pointed away from him.

whatcha think about yer hero brocaster joe rogan & him kinda seeing the light about all this?

 

[playtime]

No

of course not. why question it? right?

 

[AzogtheDefiler]

'cept, she saud quite calmly & smiled as she said she wasn't mad at him. she backed up & had her wheels pointed away from him.

whatcha think about yer hero brocaster joe rogan & him kinda seeing the light about all this?

I am not talking about that event. I am Saying in general

 

[skye]

 

[JoeB131]

If you say so. But it still has nothing to do with this shooting.

I don't care that you think the shooting was unjustified and I actually see why some people think so. I just think it's chickenshit to lie about it, bring up irrelevancies such as race and twist my words (or simply not read them properly) to make it out like I said she had no right to protest ICE.

You do this in every discussion and is why I am not vexed by your nauseating moralizing. I know you to be a liar and a hypocrite.

Every discussion, you rationalize awful behavior by the privileged class.

it's what you do.

 

[JoeB131]

View attachment 1210655

Why should anyone die for protesting a government action?

 

[Mac-7]

Why should anyone die for protesting a government action?

Its called resisting arrest while armed with a deadly weapon

 

[dblack]

Its called resisting arrest while armed with a deadly weapon

Care to cite the crime? Or ...

I bet you're just making shit up again, aren't you? Silly rabbit.

 

[Mac-7]

Care to cite the crime? Or ...

I bet you're just making shit up again, aren't you? Silly rabbit.

He attacked ICE agents

 

[dblack]

He attacked ICE agents

Of course. He was a terrorist!!!!!

Pull your panties back up. Do you believe EVERYTHING the government tells you?

 

[JoeB131]

Its called resisting arrest while armed with a deadly weapon

Right.

I remember when the CPD shot a mountain lion that had somehow wandered into the city, and a local columnist joked that the cops tried to put a pistol in it's paw.

"Not necessary this time, Clancy!"

 

[buttercup]

Of course. He was a terrorist!!!!!

Pull your panties back up. Do you believe EVERYTHING the government tells you?

Right? Also, people who parrot that phrase seem to not realize that the government WANTS us all to use that phrase against political enemies, they are encouraging the whole idea of "domestic terrorism" because it's a way for them to target people and continue to shred the constitution and bill of rights.

Frankly, I think anyone who uses that phrase is a useful idiot, and clearly hasn't thought things through. They don't seem to have considered that when the "other side" gets back in power, that script can be flipped and then THEY (anyone) can be on the receiving end of the "domestic terrorist" label. The government has already implied that patriots, gun owners, so called "conspiracy theorists" and anti-globalists are potential "domestic terrorists"... So if anyone who uses that phrase doesn't think the script will be flipped, they are being very naive and short-sighted.

 

[Mac-7]

Of course. He was a terrorist!!!!!

Pull your panties back up. Do you believe EVERYTHING the government tells you?

I never said he was a terrorist

But you did

I think he was a fool who was carried away by his love and respect for illegal alien criminals

 

[Mac-7]

Right? Also, people who parrot that phrase seem to not realize that the government WANTS us all to use that phrase against political enemies, they are encouraging the whole idea of "domestic terrorism" because it's a way for them to target people and continue to shred the constitution and bill of rights.

Frankly, I think anyone who uses that phrase is a useful idiot, and clearly hasn't thought things through. They don't seem to have considered that when the "other side" gets back in power, that script can be flipped and then THEY (anyone) can be on the receiving end of the "domestic terrorist" label. The government has already implied that patriots, gun owners, so called "conspiracy theorists" and anti-globalists are potential "domestic terrorists"... So if anyone who uses that phrase doesn't think the script will be flipped, they are being very naive and short-sighted.

“The other side” is already planning pogroms against MAGAs

That's a given

 

[Ghost of a Rider]

Every discussion, you rationalize awful behavior by the privileged class.

it's what you do.

You rationalize awful behavior by people of color. So?

 

[dblack]

Right? Also, people who parrot that phrase seem to not realize that the government WANTS us all to use that phrase against political enemies, they are encouraging the whole idea of "domestic terrorism" because it's a way for them to target people and continue to shred the constitution and bill of rights.

It always was. That was the point. The PATRIOT Act was a real blow to civil liberties and the Constitution in general. Each party will complain about it, when it suits them, but neither has made a serious attempt to repeal it.

Frankly, I think anyone who uses that phrase is a useful idiot, and clearly hasn't thought things through. They don't seem to have considered that when the "other side" gets back in power, that script can be flipped and then THEY (anyone) can be on the receiving end of the "domestic terrorist" label. The government has already implied that patriots, gun owners, so called "conspiracy theorists" and anti-globalists are potential "domestic terrorists"... So if anyone who uses that phrase doesn't think the script will be flipped, they are being very naive and short-sighted.

Yeah. But when I try to point this out to people, all I get are blank stares (or the messageboard equivalent). They're cheering for Trump basically behaving like a dictator. But if the Court, and the country, signs off on that the next Democrat will do the same and worse. It always ratchets up.

Democracy. We're doing it wrong.

 

[dblack]

“The other side” is already planning pogroms against MAGAs

That's a given

Absolutely. They'll follow all the same excesses of Trump, and then some. This is the cycle. It gets worse each election. And it's a deliberate thing. The reason each side demonizes the other (apart from the general effectiveness of fear mongering) is to establish justification for the "demonic" shit they want to do when they're back in.

 

[Mac-7]

Absolutely. They'll follow all the same excesses of Trump, and then some. This is the cycle. It gets worse each election. And it's a deliberate thing. The reason each side demonizes the other (apart from the general effectiveness of fear mongering) is to establish justification for the "demonic" shit they want to do when they're back in.

You blame trump from enforcing our immigration laws?

Biden admitted about 12 million people in 4 years

Are we expected to let them all stay?

If so then the price libs are demanding for peace is too high

 

[JoeB131]

You rationalize awful behavior by people of color. So?

You mean like Jaywalking? (Michael Brown)
Playing with a toy (Tamir Rice)
Sleeping in your bed (Breonna Taylor)
Trying to break into a truck to keep warm (Laquan McDonald)
Being here without paperwork (some immigrants; Trumpenfuhrer is going after the ones with papers, too.)

 

[JoeB131]

You blame trump from enforcing our immigration laws?

Biden admitted about 12 million people in 4 years

Are we expected to let them all stay?

If so then the price libs are demanding for peace is too high

I think there should be a case by case evaluation on who can stay and who can't.

But if there are so many that Biden has let in, why is Trump going after -

People who came in a long time ago.
People who have green cards
People on Student Visas
People who have citizenship