Breaking!! SatelLite data shows NO GLOBAL WARMING FOR 23 YEARS!

[Two Thumbs]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

your graff actually says .63C


not that I think English is your first language or anything

however my statement stands; we are wasting trillions for .63 c


and plz recall that scientist warned that in the 70's we were headed for an ice age.

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

 

[Two Thumbs]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

 

[cwise76]

Any intelligent civilization would err on the side of caution.

 

[BuckToothMoron]

Ho........Ho........Ho..........well its gonna be a lousy stinkin' yuletide season if you are a climate crusader!!!. You might say, the Grinch has stolen all the festive cheer!! These mofu's are going to be miserable.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/study-satellites-show-no-acceleration-in-global-warming-for-23-years/

To my skeptic pals............as President Trump would say, "Winning!!!"

That’s a bunch a crap. How else do you explain the fact that Manhattan is underwater, just like Igore said it would be?

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

What the fuck do you mean, not per Spencer's graph? Either you are incredibly stupid or a liar. Just to the right of the 2016 line it is 0.87, about a quarter increment to the right of the 1998 line it is 0.75.

Once again, you are a liar.

Bird_mortality_chart - Sibley Guides

 

[Old Rocks]

Ho........Ho........Ho..........well its gonna be a lousy stinkin' yuletide season if you are a climate crusader!!!. You might say, the Grinch has stolen all the festive cheer!! These mofu's are going to be miserable.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/study-satellites-show-no-acceleration-in-global-warming-for-23-years/

To my skeptic pals............as President Trump would say, "Winning!!!"

That’s a bunch a crap. How else do you explain the fact that Manhattan is underwater, just like Igore said it would be?

Screen name is apt. Sandy.

 

[Slyhunter]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

What the fuck do you mean, not per Spencer's graph? Either you are incredibly stupid or a liar. Just to the right of the 2016 line it is 0.87, about a quarter increment to the right of the 1998 line it is 0.75.

Once again, you are a liar.

Bird_mortality_chart - Sibley Guides

I'd like to see the numbers compared as a percentage of wndows, vs as a percentage of wind turbines. There are more windows than turbines.

 

[Two Thumbs]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

What the fuck do you mean, not per Spencer's graph? Either you are incredibly stupid or a liar. Just to the right of the 2016 line it is 0.87, about a quarter increment to the right of the 1998 line it is 0.75.

Once again, you are a liar.

Bird_mortality_chart - Sibley Guides

Oct 17th
+0.63 deg. C


Is EXACTLY what your graf is saying, it spells it out, with an arrow even.

so guess who the liar is?

hint, it sounds like eue

 

[skookerasbil]

lol...........with this new scientific evidence, the OP is simply piling on and further highlighting an epic effort of fAiL..............



So who exactly is winning here?



TEAM A : Boasting about a .5C increase in temperature that the Climate Change Industry has been doing for 25 years over, and over and over.............

OR

TEAM B : Seeing no legislation in congress for the past 10 years over the .5C. Laughably low levels of renewable energy on the American landscape after 25 years. No public interest in global warming. EPA regulations getting nuked as we speak. Paris treaty dead. A resurgence of coal. China building 2-3 coal plants/month. No mention ( again ) of climate change in the presidential debates from last year. Green candidates getting whacked in the mid-terms of 2016.




Baah Baah Booey.............I'll take Team B s0ns!!!

 

[Old Rocks]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

What the fuck do you mean, not per Spencer's graph? Either you are incredibly stupid or a liar. Just to the right of the 2016 line it is 0.87, about a quarter increment to the right of the 1998 line it is 0.75.

Once again, you are a liar.

Bird_mortality_chart - Sibley Guides

Oct 17th
+0.63 deg. C


Is EXACTLY what your graf is saying, it spells it out, with an arrow even.

so guess who the liar is?

hint, it sounds like eue

My God, you truly are that stupid. See the little circles on the graph? Each one represents a month. See the numbers standing vertically on the bottom of the graph? Those are years. The numbers on the left represent tenths of a degree deviation from normal. See the 0.8 line? Trace it across. In 1998, you will find a circle at about 0.75. In 2016, you will find a circle at about 0.87. Fuck man, this is third grade stuff!

 

[Two Thumbs]

so for a .5C change we should spend trillions.....


it was warmer in 1998

Dumb fuck, that is nearly 1 C at present. And we are going to spend trillions worldwide for energy in the coming two decades. And since solar and wind are the cheapest energy, per kw/hr delivered, that is the best way to go. Then there is the matter of the sea walls to protect some of our port cities. Sea walls or moving the cities inland because of sea level rise. A rise that is already creating problems in the East Coast cities.

not per your graff

wind and solar suck and destroy the environments they are built in, they mass slaughter birds on a scale unseen in history.

and we have no issues on the east coast

What the fuck do you mean, not per Spencer's graph? Either you are incredibly stupid or a liar. Just to the right of the 2016 line it is 0.87, about a quarter increment to the right of the 1998 line it is 0.75.

Once again, you are a liar.

Bird_mortality_chart - Sibley Guides

Oct 17th
+0.63 deg. C


Is EXACTLY what your graf is saying, it spells it out, with an arrow even.

so guess who the liar is?

hint, it sounds like eue

My God, you truly are that stupid. See the little circles on the graph? Each one represents a month. See the numbers standing vertically on the bottom of the graph? Those are years. The numbers on the left represent tenths of a degree deviation from normal. See the 0.8 line? Trace it across. In 1998, you will find a circle at about 0.75. In 2016, you will find a circle at about 0.87. Fuck man, this is third grade stuff!

so you don't know what the other line is for

its for the averages over time


it even says so




go back to 3rd grade and beat the shit out of your math teacher

 

[skookerasbil]

Zero in 23 years!!

Who's not winning?

 

[MaryL]

Ho........Ho........Ho..........well its gonna be a lousy stinkin' yuletide season if you are a climate crusader!!!. You might say, the Grinch has stolen all the festive cheer!! These mofu's are going to be miserable.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/study-satellites-show-no-acceleration-in-global-warming-for-23-years/

To my skeptic pals............as President Trump would say, "Winning!!!"

Well excuse me, I voted for Trump. But this is a lie. Not true, false news. I am a truth-er above all. .

 

[Old Rocks]

No temperature increase, but the glaciers worldwide are in rapid retreat and thinning? LOL

 

[CrusaderFrank]

Prior to 1850, Glaciers never melted

 

[skookerasbil]

No temperature increase, but the glaciers worldwide are in rapid retreat and thinning? LOL

All of the models predicted that the Karakoram glaciers would retreat......but they haven't. Other glaciers at latitudes further south have expanded as well.( conveniently ignored by the global warming alarmist community )


Some Of The World’s Largest Non-Polar Glaciers Are Expanding, Despite Global Warming

Again.........when you read the article, you realize that the computer models have zero reliability at predicting the future for any climate scenario.

 

[skookerasbil]

Ho........Ho........Ho..........well its gonna be a lousy stinkin' yuletide season if you are a climate crusader!!!. You might say, the Grinch has stolen all the festive cheer!! These mofu's are going to be miserable.


http://dailycaller.com/2017/11/29/study-satellites-show-no-acceleration-in-global-warming-for-23-years/

To my skeptic pals............as President Trump would say, "Winning!!!"

Well excuse me, I voted for Trump. But this is a lie. Not true, false news. I am a truth-er above all. .

Well........what a brilliant analysis sweetie...........oh........so how is it a lie?

 

[Old Rocks]

No temperature increase, but the glaciers worldwide are in rapid retreat and thinning? LOL

All of the models predicted that the Karakoram glaciers would retreat......but they haven't. Other glaciers at latitudes further south have expanded as well.( conveniently ignored by the global warming alarmist community )


Some Of The World’s Largest Non-Polar Glaciers Are Expanding, Despite Global Warming

Again.........when you read the article, you realize that the computer models have zero reliability at predicting the future for any climate scenario.

Nov 27, 2015 • Capitalizing on the long Landsat data record and the human brain’s capacity to recognize movement, Frank Paul from the University of Zurich has created glacier animations that enable viewers to witness the complex flow of glaciers.

Animating the “Karakoram Anomaly” with Landsat « Landsat Science

Measuring glacier movement—famed for its glacial pace—is often done with GPS ground measurements or image-based feature tracking (e.g. the movement of surface debris). While these measurements are reliable, visually demonstrating this gradual movement using static images can be challenging given the brain’s limited ability to discern change between two static images.

Paul’s paper, published on Nov. 26 in The Cryosphere, focuses on a set of four regions with numerous glaciers in the central Karakoram mountain range, a steep rouged landscape of high terrain (> 7000 m or ~23,000 feet in some places) and home to behemoths such as K2.

In this region, unlike most other global locations, several glaciers are rapidly advancing. But these are surging glaciers whose normal flow rate is interspersed with periods when velocities increase by as much as three orders of magnitude. The accreting behavior of the region’s glaciers has been labeled the “Karakoram Anomaly.”

Paul’s animations allow Karakoram glacier flow patterns to come alive for viewers. Both the regular flow of non-surging glaciers and the peculiar flow patterns of surging glaciers can be witnessed. In this complex interaction, supra-glacial lakes appear and disappear, terminuses advance, rivers of ice coalesce then separate post-surge, and all the while glacial debris seems to dance and swirl.

The animations were created for everyone interested in seeing how dynamic and complex the interactions between glaciers can be, especially in the understudied Karakoram region, Paul explained.

Surging glaciers. Measure them at the beginning of the surge, or after the meltback after the surge, and they are retreating, measure them at the height of the surge, and they are expanding.

http://dailycaller.com/2017/08/11/s...laciers-are-expanding-despite-global-warming/

Some of the largest non-polar glaciers in the world are either stable or growing due to a “vortex” of cold air over a 1,200-mile section of the greater Himalayan mountain range in central Asia, according to a new study.

Climate models haven’t been able to reproduce the phenomenon, which is keeping Karakoram mountain range glaciers from melting like most of the world’s other glaciers, the study found.

“While most glaciers are retreating as a result of global warming, the glaciers of the Karakoram range in South Asia are stable or even growing,” Hayley Fowler, the study’s co-author and professor at Newcastle University, said in a statement.

Karakoram is one of the most heavily-glaciated areas of the world outside the poles, and boasts the world’s second- and third-largest non-polar glaciers. It’s also home to the world’s second-largest peak, K2 —

Yes, as the article you posted clearly says, most of the world's glaciers are retreating and thinning. A few, because of localized conditions, are expanding, or at least expanding within a limited time frame. Compared to the amount of ice the rest of the glaciers in the world, and, indeed, within the Himalayas, melting, the amount of water involved in the expansion of those particular glaciers, is minute compared to the amount of melt.

 

[CrusaderFrank]

LOL

http://www.drroyspencer.com/wp-content/uploads/UAH_LT_1979_thru_October_2017_v6-1.jpg

No warming but the polar caps and Greenland are melting, and virtually all of the alpine glaciers are in receding? What stupid statement.

Linking to a chart showing no warming, and claiming that it's proof of global warming -- priceless