Chinese Balloon Not The Only Thing That Has Popped For Democrats: NO Global Warming For 8 Years

"Recently published data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there has not been global warming for the past eight years. And NASA satellite data reportedly confirms that evidence, showing no global warming for eight years and five months, according to JunkScience’s Steve Milloy. But leftists are quick to warn people against drawing the obvious conclusion that the world isn’t about to become a burning ball of fire."

The world's coastlines have not been flooded. The seas are not boiling.



It's official:

"No global warming for 8 years and 5 months, per NASA satellite data.

That's no warming despite ~475 billion tons of CO2 emissions.

CO2 warming is the biggest scientific hoax of all time.
"


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/02/03/the-new-pause-lengthens-again-101-months-and-counting/…

Image
8:46 PM · Feb 3, 2023
https://twitter.com/intent/like?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1621686480912384001|twgr^8b6f9a6696c4d6b86baf2badfdf685883d6b3544|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/catherinesalgado/2023/02/04/hot-air-no-global-warming-for-eight-years-n1667955&tweet_id=1621686480912384001



As the Democrats say, "THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED."




Does this mean we can send AOC packing, back to being a bartender?
Flippin comical, PJ Media, I am so surprised. But hell, let's quote it,

but we’re not allowed to “extrapolate” years of data to reach an obvious conclusion.

No sugar, you ARE allowed to extrapolate years of data to reach an obvious conclusion. You just refuse to do that, and in fact, ignore it when it is staring you in the face. The original source of this information,


And the graph posted immediately following the one we see in the OP,

image-4.png


Any questions?
 
SIlly - this isn't a GRAPH!

It's one of Hunter Biden's hand-painted masterpieces.

:auiqs.jpg:
Great rebuttal. What is funny is that you take an article from PJ Media written by some young loser woman whose first language is not English, who is probably writing from her Mom's basement and has no education or professional training whatsoever. She based the article on a tweet from a tweeter user that is probably as uneducated as her and more than likely mathematically challenged.

Both of those amateurs were taking their information from Christopher Monckton, the third Viscount of Monckton--British aristocracy at a laughably low level without a seat in the House of Lords. Well known climate change denier who has no training in meteorology, his degree is in "Classics". I mean you can't make this shit up. Quoting from the source article previously linked,

The sheer frequency and length of these Pauses provide a graphic demonstration, readily understandable to all, that It’s Not Worse Than We Thought – that global warming is slow, small, harmless and, on the evidence to date at any rate, strongly net-beneficial.

There are so many logically fallacies in that statement that it could provide a couple weeks worth of work in a Philosophy class in logic. I especially like the glaring signal of bullshit, "readily understandable to all".
 
Great rebuttal. What is funny is that you take an article from PJ Media written by some young loser woman whose first language is not English, who is probably writing from her Mom's basement and has no education or professional training whatsoever. She based the article on a tweet from a tweeter user that is probably as uneducated as her and more than likely mathematically challenged.

Both of those amateurs were taking their information from Christopher Monckton, the third Viscount of Monckton--British aristocracy at a laughably low level without a seat in the House of Lords. Well known climate change denier who has no training in meteorology, his degree is in "Classics". I mean you can't make this shit up. Quoting from the source article previously linked,

The sheer frequency and length of these Pauses provide a graphic demonstration, readily understandable to all, that It’s Not Worse Than We Thought – that global warming is slow, small, harmless and, on the evidence to date at any rate, strongly net-beneficial.

There are so many logically fallacies in that statement that it could provide a couple weeks worth of work in a Philosophy class in logic. I especially like the glaring signal of bullshit, "readily understandable to all".
You sound like you seriously need to get laid or seriously need to get a sense of humor

(...and HELL NO, I'm NOT offering)

:abgg2q.jpg:
 
"Recently published data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there has not been global warming for the past eight years. And NASA satellite data reportedly confirms that evidence, showing no global warming for eight years and five months, according to JunkScience’s Steve Milloy. But leftists are quick to warn people against drawing the obvious conclusion that the world isn’t about to become a burning ball of fire."

The world's coastlines have not been flooded. The seas are not boiling.



It's official:

"No global warming for 8 years and 5 months, per NASA satellite data.

That's no warming despite ~475 billion tons of CO2 emissions.

CO2 warming is the biggest scientific hoax of all time.
"


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/02/03/the-new-pause-lengthens-again-101-months-and-counting/…

Image
8:46 PM · Feb 3, 2023
https://twitter.com/intent/like?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1621686480912384001|twgr^8b6f9a6696c4d6b86baf2badfdf685883d6b3544|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/catherinesalgado/2023/02/04/hot-air-no-global-warming-for-eight-years-n1667955&tweet_id=1621686480912384001



As the Democrats say, "THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED."




Does this mean we can send AOC packing, back to being a bartender?
Nope they will double down on stupidity!
 
Flippin comical, PJ Media, I am so surprised. But hell, let's quote it,

but we’re not allowed to “extrapolate” years of data to reach an obvious conclusion.

No sugar, you ARE allowed to extrapolate years of data to reach an obvious conclusion. You just refuse to do that, and in fact, ignore it when it is staring you in the face. The original source of this information,


And the graph posted immediately following the one we see in the OP,

image-4.png


Any questions?
a 0.5 deg C rise.... :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg: :auiqs.jpg:

Not long enough or fast enough to show ANY Anthropogenic affect. We have had temperature changes far faster and far more significant in the past. This falls clearly inside natrual variation. Your going to have to prove causation is man.

greenlan ice core- interglacial.PNG
 
WHy do you idiots only take the warming half of the 350 year solar cycle? Only the last hundred years of it?
Because 140 years give you a better representation than exactly 8 years and 5 months from the OP POV. It is also the approximate time frame of our increased CO2 emissions.
 
Meanwhile back in reality...

1675568321462-png.753990
Meanwhile back in reality??? okay shall we talk about Biden's spy balloon again... that was so real we could watch it from our front yards... with a president too afraid or too compromised to do shit about it... that's as real as it gets dumbass...
Climate change is not a threat... China is a threat stop falling for BS....
 
"Recently published data from the National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration (NOAA) shows that there has not been global warming for the past eight years. And NASA satellite data reportedly confirms that evidence, showing no global warming for eight years and five months, according to JunkScience’s Steve Milloy. But leftists are quick to warn people against drawing the obvious conclusion that the world isn’t about to become a burning ball of fire."

The world's coastlines have not been flooded. The seas are not boiling.



It's official:

"No global warming for 8 years and 5 months, per NASA satellite data.

That's no warming despite ~475 billion tons of CO2 emissions.

CO2 warming is the biggest scientific hoax of all time.
"


https://wattsupwiththat.com/2023/02/03/the-new-pause-lengthens-again-101-months-and-counting/…

Image
8:46 PM · Feb 3, 2023
https://twitter.com/intent/like?ref_src=twsrc^tfw|twcamp^tweetembed|twterm^1621686480912384001|twgr^8b6f9a6696c4d6b86baf2badfdf685883d6b3544|twcon^s1_&ref_url=https://pjmedia.com/news-and-politics/catherinesalgado/2023/02/04/hot-air-no-global-warming-for-eight-years-n1667955&tweet_id=1621686480912384001



As the Democrats say, "THE SCIENCE IS SETTLED."




Does this mean we can send AOC packing, back to being a bartender?
But but but AOC said we only have twelve years left. The world is going to end in 2031. Maybe she really meant Biden's nuclear WWIII.
 
Because 140 years give you a better representation than exactly 8 years and 5 months from the OP POV. It is also the approximate time frame of our increased CO2 emissions.
But it does not show what has happened PRIOR to CO2 emissions.... That is why it is still fraud to claim it is man caused when the earth can clearly do it all by itself despite CO2 levels... The earth had levels above 7000ppm and our climate never ran away. What changed that makes CO2 more powerful than in the past?
 

New Topics

Forum List

Back
Top