- Dec 18, 2013
- 137,100
- 28,166
- 2,180
Your Irrationality is evasiveLol, the Republican official position on the leak is out rage but yes I can certainly see motives for both sides to have this be public knowledge right now.
Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
Your Irrationality is evasiveLol, the Republican official position on the leak is out rage but yes I can certainly see motives for both sides to have this be public knowledge right now.
and it's about the court system. derpPrecedent refers to a court decision that is considered as authority for deciding subsequent cases involving identical or similar facts, or similar legal issues. Precedent is incorporated into the doctrine of stare decisis and requires courts to apply the law in the same manner to cases with the same facts.
The precedent Harry set for the Senate was for the lower court nominees because the GOP was unprecedentedly blocking so many of Obama's appointments. After that all lower court noiminees needed just a simple majority to be confirmed.
The precedent Mitch set for the Senate was for the supreme court nominees because the Dems, as expected, blocked one nominee for about 40 hours. After that all......
I know it's been programmed into you that both precedents were instigated by Reid, so argument is futile.
Why didn't the senate amended it rule or close the 'Constitutional Option' loop hole? Btw there is no Constitutional requirement for a super majority in the Senate to confirm these appointments.
still wrong.I'm not sure why there's even a controversy. Maybe it was McConnell's unprecedented Garland move. The gop cannot be the instigator. It's sort of like a "sports team" discussion. "My team is better."
It's really just that there's demographic and age change going on that doesn't favor conservatives. McConnell confirmed 3 justices in Trump's 4 years and 2 in Obama's 8.
The Supreme Court’s ‘Dead Hand’
The 6–3 majority-conservative Supreme Court is dangerously out of step with a demographically and culturally changing America.www.theatlantic.com
It's not the first time a Sup Ct was culturally and socially at odds with society. (and don't tell me about Reagan the moral maj because Americans consistently believe abortion should be an option early in pregnancy, and it's not close) Do republican men think there's right to buy contraceptives? bwah. If you asked QAnons whether people should have a right to post on social media anonymously to influence public opinion, there'd be a right to privacy. Trump is not a huge fan of disclosure laws. Vaccine passports, bwah.
The Warren Court got out in front of the public. IF Justice Owen Roberts hadn't switched to go along with the New Deal, we might have 12-15 Justices. We had a civil war when the Sup Ct upheld fining abolitionists for sheltering fugitive slaves. Andrew Jackson simply refused to abide by Sup Ct rulings.
nope. Sorry.Really ? You must not cavort with anyone who speaks English correctly. Fascist are right wingers…according to every dictionary not associated with Fix News.
how could he? he didn't write laws. Or didn't you know that?Wasn’t Trump supposed to ”repeal and replace“ that? It was going to be easy, right? Had the House, Senate and WH! What happened?
can't make it up, it isn't accept when it is.Downloading a copy is theft?
Conservatives Call For Supreme Court Leaker to Be Prosecuted. But Did They Commit a Crime?
Conservative lawmakers and pundits are calling for the Supreme Court leaker to be prosecuted. But it's not clear they committed a crime.www.mediaite.com
“Leaking a Supreme Court decision is not a crime,” former federal prosecutor Renato Mariotti wrote on Twitter in response to Shapiro.
He explained further in a comment to Mediaite: “It is conceivable that the leaker could be prosecuted, depending on the circumstances of the leak, but it is unlikely that any prosecution would be successful if the leaker already had legal access to the opinion.”
Orin Kerr, a law professor at the University of California, Berkeley, said he did not think leaking a draft opinion was a crime, pointing out that draft opinions are not classified.
except when he was captured and gave secrets, from what I've read.Is that you Jane?
I've disagreed with most of McCains policies but flying combat missions over N.Vietnam earned him a non-traitor status in most my book. Of course in the picture book Trumpybear fans have he was a scorned captured traitor to the Exalted One.
didn't Gore? same go for him?And, of course, you believe EVERYTHING your orange godlet tells you, right?
You're "SHOCKED" that Justice Alito is Pro Life, Handle? Why exactly?The opinions of the supreme court on abortion.
They really didn't want this to come out right now.
He promised he would get it done, but he didn’t. Good enough reason to vote him out.how could he? he didn't write laws. Or didn't you know that?
So affordable gas isn’t your thing? Illegal foreigners is your thing! So, I disagreeHe promised he would get it done, but he didn’t. Good enough reason to vote him out.
You don’t need to apologize to me for being wrong. It was expected.nope. Sorry.
More evidence you don’t know shit.more evidence a rock is smarter than you.
Burp.Bullshit.
Horseshit, cowshit, and pigshit.
YOU are a liar.
Leftist authoritarians are FAMOUS in history.
That was an ignorant post. You won the stupidity race to the bottom.Leftards should be forbidden from voting. They're too stupid, they shouldn't be given any power.