Biden Team Considers Banning Conservative Media from Press Briefings

I love the delicious irony that a thread purportedly about the legitmacy of "conservative media" ----- links to Jim the Fuck Hoft, as fake-news a source as exists on planet Terra.

Why the fuck would there be "conservative media" in the WH anyway? That press room is for journalistic media, not punditry. The commentators already have their own platform for their crackpot agenda. They don't get to hitch a free ride at the People's House. Fuck 'em. Let 'em get their material from real journalists just like everybody else, and pay their dues instead of whining to get shit for free.

NOTHING the Hateway Plunder site does has anything to do with "reporting" or "journalism". Fuck him and the whores he rode in on.
There is no journalism when 90% of "journalists" vote for the same party.

You actually think journalism is voting? :cuckoo:
I actually think the media cannot do unbiased journalism when 90% of them vote for one party and then attempt to report on it and the opposition. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?

Thought I already said this.

Journalism is not voting.

Is the board software translating into Albanian again? Or are you just dense?
No one thinks journalism is voting. Normal people, however, do understand that reporting on an administration cannot be considered unbiased when 90% of the journalists voted for the president in office. Is that too difficult to understand?

Once AGAIN for the Albanians ....................... THEY'RE NOT FUCKING RELATED.

Would you refuse or dismiss the expertise of a dentist because his/her political views didn't align with your own? A car mechanic? A restaurant? A plumber? You would not, because you go to them for their expertise in dentistry, auto mechanics, food preparation or plumbing, not for voting advice.

On the other hand would you take a digestive ailment to some clown with no medical experience just because he echoes your political rants? AGAIN you would not, you'd go to a doctor because he knows what to do and has seen it before.

So if you must insist on a false causation --- Journalists, by definition, have their nose in the news constantly, whether it's directly what they cover or indirectly for the context of what they cover. So to entertain your puerile littls fallacy, those journalists know what's going on better than anybody. Now do the math and Bob becomes your uncle.
What you fail to realize is that when journalists report on political figures, their reporting IS linked to how they vote, bias is inevitable and there is no oath or anything to prevent them from being biased.

Assuming "facts" not in evidence. Faulty premise. I'm afraid your wishful thinking STILL doesn't manifest stuff into the world of the Real.

By that logic you can't go to that dentist because he's going to intentionally hurt you because of your political identity --- because "bias is inevitable", He'll prolly put a faulty cap in there so he can gouge more money out of you because you're a Birther or whatever. Your car mechanic is going to deliberately leave your lug nuts loose. Your plumber is going to route your sewer back into your faucet. Your cook at the restaurant is going to pee in your drink. Because "bias is inevitable" --- it may be but you have no evidence that it manifests in unrelated activity, so your false premise is dismissed with prejudice.

The rest of your flailing attempt to prop up this false premise was just absurd so I did you a favor and cut it.
I'll keep this short because apparently you have a short attention span. Calling you an idiot would be a disservice to idiots if you are going to be so dense as to not get what I'm telling you. You go to certain dentists because their beliefs about DENTISTRY influence how they treat you and thus how traumatic is your visit. You pick a mechanic because his beliefs about CAR PARTS and how much work needs to be done matches yours. You pick a restaurant because they agree with you on FOOD. Likewise, journalists pick and write political stories in ways that match their POLITICAL beliefs. When you see George steponallofus asking Quid Pro tough questions and reports negatively on him, look outside because there will be pigs flying around.

You know nothing about journalism. Journalists don't "pick" their stories. They get assigned.

And you CONTINUE TO have zero evidence of causation, so now you've dropped to ad hom. You're done.
It is true that the average talking head only regurgitates what comes from the AP. That just means that journalists and editors at the AP write and select the stories that most of those who watch the news are going to hear. It's just a smaller group with the same inclinations.
 
Biden's team never said ban conservatives. They said they aren't putting up with "media" pushing disproven conspiracy theories. And it's damn time somebody did just that.
It should have done when Russia! Russia! Russia! was the conspiracy theory.
 
You lying misogynist.
Nope. The video shows the facts and she came after him. she's lucky he didn't file charges.
You are a blatant liar. She’s holding the microphone moron. Accostedher puts his hands on her. The look on her face says it all.
Oh. That explains it. You’re confused as to who Acosta is.
1611959533819.jpeg


Acosta is the one in the suit. The woman in the dress is Trump’s thug coming to attack him as he hold the microphone. The look on her face is one of rage, that of someone possibly on drugs who is dangerous threat to the life of others.
 
You lying misogynist.
Nope. The video shows the facts and she came after him. she's lucky he didn't file charges.
You are a blatant liar. She’s holding the microphone moron. Accostedher puts his hands on her. The look on her face says it all.
Oh. That explains it. You’re confused as to who Acosta is.
View attachment 450374

Acosta is the one in the suit. The woman in the dress is Trump’s thug coming to attack him as he hold the microphone. The look on her face is one of rage, that of someone possibly on drugs who is dangerous threat to the life of others.
[/QUOTE]
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
 
These briefings are pretty much a waste of time time when the President is a Democrat it’s a lot of softball questions when it’s a Republican it’s a lot of grandstanding to try and get a viral moment. On rare occasions someone will ask a serious question and on the even more rare occasion the Press Secretary will slip up and answer it honestly.
 
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
Who’s holding the microphone in the photo?
 
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
Who’s holding the microphone in the photo?
By rule his time was up. Meaning give up the microphone. To the lady carrying it around (known as a job). Your pathetic deflection is destroyed. No other reporter put his hands on the woman. Keep trying. You’ll never be right about anything but it’s fun destroying you.
 
Acosta “assaulted” no one. The president threw him out unilaterally because he’s weak.

The WHCA makes the call as to who gets in the briefing room which is a limited resource.

Hey everyone, the Nazis are lying again - how unique.

Looks like self defense. She attacked him first.
No doubt she could kick lil Jimmy's ass.
 
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
Who’s holding the microphone in the photo?
Acosta is a serial asswipe. Why do you love him so much?
 
By rule his time was up. Meaning give up the microphone. To the lady carrying it around (known as a job). Your pathetic deflection is destroyed. No other reporter put his hands on the woman. Keep trying. You’ll never be right about anything but it’s fun destroying you.
Who is holding the microphone?
 
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
Who’s holding the microphone in the photo?
Acosta is a serial asswipe. Why do you love him so much?

Tell this asswipe for me.
She’s holding the microphone moron.
They won’t listen to me.
 
You are again proven to be a fucking liar. Accostedher refusing to follow rules and assaulting the woman. You need to be slapped really really hard fuckwit. You know you look like a complete ass here (as usual) you lying woman hater.
Who’s holding the microphone in the photo?
Acosta is a serial asswipe. Why do you love him so much?

Tell this asswipe for me.
She’s holding the microphone moron.
They won’t listen to me.
Nobody will ever listen to a proven liar like you. A noted hater of women’s who’s only defense is “she deserved it” . Blaming the victim. You’re getting destroyed here asshole.
 
You lying misogynist.
Nope. The video shows the facts and she came after him. she's lucky he didn't file charges.
You are a blatant liar. She’s holding the microphone moron. Accostedher puts his hands on her. The look on her face says it all.
Oh. That explains it. You’re confused as to who Acosta is.
View attachment 450374

Acosta is the one in the suit. The woman in the dress is Trump’s thug coming to attack him as he hold the microphone. The look on her face is one of rage, that of someone possibly on drugs who is dangerous threat to the life of others.

The woman in the dress is Trump’s thug coming to attack him

He is a delicate flower, isn't he?
 
Nobody will ever listen to a proven liar like you. A noted hater of women’s who’s only defense is “she deserved it” . Blaming the victim. You’re getting destroyed here asshole.

Am I supposed to believe you? The person that said she's holding the microphone and won't admit they were wrong when presented incontrovertible photographic evidence?

Who's holding the microphone?
 

Forum List

Back
Top