I love the delicious irony that a thread purportedly about the legitmacy of "conservative media" ----- links to Jim the **** Hoft, as fake-news a source as exists on planet Terra.
Why the **** would there be "conservative media" in the WH anyway? That press room is for journalistic media, not punditry. The commentators already have their own platform for their crackpot agenda. They don't get to hitch a free ride at the People's House. **** 'em. Let 'em get their material from real journalists just like everybody else, and pay their dues instead of whining to get shit for free.
NOTHING the Hateway Plunder site does has anything to do with "reporting" or "journalism". **** him and the whores he rode in on.
There is no journalism when 90% of "journalists" vote for the same party.
You actually think journalism is
voting?
I actually think the media cannot do unbiased journalism when 90% of them vote for one party and then attempt to report on it and the opposition. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?
Thought I already said this.
Journalism is not voting.
Is the board software translating into Albanian again? Or are you just dense?
No one thinks journalism is voting. Normal people, however, do understand that reporting on an administration cannot be considered unbiased when 90% of the journalists voted for the president in office. Is that too difficult to understand?
Once AGAIN for the Albanians ....................... THEY'RE NOT ******* RELATED.
Would you refuse or dismiss the expertise of a dentist because his/her political views didn't align with your own? A car mechanic? A restaurant? A plumber? You would not, because you go to them for their expertise in dentistry, auto mechanics, food preparation or plumbing, not for voting advice.
On the other hand would you take a digestive ailment to some clown with no medical experience just because he echoes your political rants? AGAIN you would not, you'd go to a doctor because he knows what to do and has seen it before.
So if you must insist on a false causation --- Journalists, by definition, have their nose in the news constantly, whether it's directly what they cover or indirectly for the context of what they cover. So to entertain your puerile littls fallacy, those journalists know what's going on better than anybody. Now do the math and Bob becomes your uncle.