It is true that the average talking head only regurgitates what comes from the AP. That just means that journalists and editors at the AP write and select the stories that most of those who watch the news are going to hear. It's just a smaller group with the same inclinations.I'll keep this short because apparently you have a short attention span. Calling you an idiot would be a disservice to idiots if you are going to be so dense as to not get what I'm telling you. You go to certain dentists because their beliefs about DENTISTRY influence how they treat you and thus how traumatic is your visit. You pick a mechanic because his beliefs about CAR PARTS and how much work needs to be done matches yours. You pick a restaurant because they agree with you on FOOD. Likewise, journalists pick and write political stories in ways that match their POLITICAL beliefs. When you see George steponallofus asking Quid Pro tough questions and reports negatively on him, look outside because there will be pigs flying around.What you fail to realize is that when journalists report on political figures, their reporting IS linked to how they vote, bias is inevitable and there is no oath or anything to prevent them from being biased.No one thinks journalism is voting. Normal people, however, do understand that reporting on an administration cannot be considered unbiased when 90% of the journalists voted for the president in office. Is that too difficult to understand?I actually think the media cannot do unbiased journalism when 90% of them vote for one party and then attempt to report on it and the opposition. Do you have a reading comprehension problem?There is no journalism when 90% of "journalists" vote for the same party.I love the delicious irony that a thread purportedly about the legitmacy of "conservative media" ----- links to Jim the Fuck Hoft, as fake-news a source as exists on planet Terra.
Why the fuck would there be "conservative media" in the WH anyway? That press room is for journalistic media, not punditry. The commentators already have their own platform for their crackpot agenda. They don't get to hitch a free ride at the People's House. Fuck 'em. Let 'em get their material from real journalists just like everybody else, and pay their dues instead of whining to get shit for free.
NOTHING the Hateway Plunder site does has anything to do with "reporting" or "journalism". Fuck him and the whores he rode in on.
You actually think journalism is voting?
Thought I already said this.
Journalism is not voting.
Is the board software translating into Albanian again? Or are you just dense?
Once AGAIN for the Albanians ....................... THEY'RE NOT FUCKING RELATED.
Would you refuse or dismiss the expertise of a dentist because his/her political views didn't align with your own? A car mechanic? A restaurant? A plumber? You would not, because you go to them for their expertise in dentistry, auto mechanics, food preparation or plumbing, not for voting advice.
On the other hand would you take a digestive ailment to some clown with no medical experience just because he echoes your political rants? AGAIN you would not, you'd go to a doctor because he knows what to do and has seen it before.
So if you must insist on a false causation --- Journalists, by definition, have their nose in the news constantly, whether it's directly what they cover or indirectly for the context of what they cover. So to entertain your puerile littls fallacy, those journalists know what's going on better than anybody. Now do the math and Bob becomes your uncle.
Assuming "facts" not in evidence. Faulty premise. I'm afraid your wishful thinking STILL doesn't manifest stuff into the world of the Real.
By that logic you can't go to that dentist because he's going to intentionally hurt you because of your political identity --- because "bias is inevitable", He'll prolly put a faulty cap in there so he can gouge more money out of you because you're a Birther or whatever. Your car mechanic is going to deliberately leave your lug nuts loose. Your plumber is going to route your sewer back into your faucet. Your cook at the restaurant is going to pee in your drink. Because "bias is inevitable" --- it may be but you have no evidence that it manifests in unrelated activity, so your false premise is dismissed with prejudice.
The rest of your flailing attempt to prop up this false premise was just absurd so I did you a favor and cut it.
You know nothing about journalism. Journalists don't "pick" their stories. They get assigned.
And you CONTINUE TO have zero evidence of causation, so now you've dropped to ad hom. You're done.