Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature may not be available in some browsers.
Yep. The 'Conservatives' will use the same charts to show that Bush had a few good years on unemployment, then turn around and state that the charts are lying when they are showing the unemployment coming down for Obama. As two faced as you can get.
What's dense about it?And unemployment is now under 6%. Statistical fact.
When you color in your unicorn coloring-book,what is your favorite color?
And another one of those repeated lies.
You cant make this shit up.....
View attachment 32625
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Advertisers use a very basic subliminal psychology to make you buy products. It's by putting a message in your face over and over.
Democrats have been using the internet to spin lies for two elections now.
You can see Candy Man and others use them here.
Type a completely false statement in a title and let the dissenters reply away. Truth and debate don't matter, but replies to the thread serve the goal; bump the lie over and over so undecided voters see the lie over and over. Most people don't read threads, but they see the titles every day.
You don't believe me? Just read how Candy states her FALSE thread title that Obama dropped gas prices, then admits he didn't, then repeats the lie, then admits he didn't, then repeats the lie, back and forth, while the real goal has nothing to do with honest debate. The goal is only to bump the LIE, lol.
Dotcommie has done the same in her threads.
The key is to respond to the lie, but not IN their threads.Resist the urge to reply to the outright lie in THEIR threads; reply in other threads. Let their FRAUDULENT threads die of lack of oxygen.
You know when you've come across this special type thread when the OP admits it over and over RIGHT IN THE THREAD. LOL
Now flame away dumb ass liberals....I look forward to you bumping MY thread title! Wahahahahahahahaa
You still haven't shown how the numbers are fake or how the numbers are calculated differently now than they were in the past.What's dense about it?And unemployment is now under 6%. Statistical fact.
When you color in your unicorn coloring-book,what is your favorite color?
And another one of those repeated lies.
You cant make this shit up.....
View attachment 32625
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Jesus you people....
How many times have the numbers been posted of those who gave up looking for work? I posted four or five links just yesterday on this very topic,one even from the HuffingPaint post.
We know they aren't counted among the unemployed so that skews those numbers in a huge way.
The numbers are fake. If you're not smart enough to figure that out you're hopeless.
What's dense about it?And unemployment is now under 6%. Statistical fact.
When you color in your unicorn coloring-book,what is your favorite color?
And another one of those repeated lies.
You cant make this shit up.....
View attachment 32625
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
You are missing the point....What's dense about it?And unemployment is now under 6%. Statistical fact.
When you color in your unicorn coloring-book,what is your favorite color?
And another one of those repeated lies.
You cant make this shit up.....
View attachment 32625
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Jesus you people....
How many times have the numbers been posted of those who gave up looking for work? I posted four or five links just yesterday on this very topic,one even from the HuffingPaint post.
We know they aren't counted among the unemployed so that skews those numbers in a huge way.
The numbers are fake. If you're not smart enough to figure that out you're hopeless.
You are missing the point....What's dense about it?
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Jesus you people....
How many times have the numbers been posted of those who gave up looking for work? I posted four or five links just yesterday on this very topic,one even from the HuffingPaint post.
We know they aren't counted among the unemployed so that skews those numbers in a huge way.
The numbers are fake. If you're not smart enough to figure that out you're hopeless.
If the same measurements are used in who they count and who they don't count, back in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2014 etc.... then the COMPARISON of U/E numbers is accurate... period.
YOU want to now CHANGE the measurements, MID STREAM, and want to count work force participation numbers in the total of our U/E numbers now...
WHEN they were never in those U/E numbers for the past 15 years, in the least.
Why would you want to fudge and change numbers mid stream, where we could not compare accurately, compare apples to apples?
Work force numbers with participation rates, have been measured by them selves for the last 15 plus years as well, and we can see by those numbers that the participation rate is going down....BUT THAT is a separate measurement, has been a separate measurement, and should stay a separate measurement instead of getting lost in U/E numbers if you incorporated it with U/E.
You are missing the point....What's dense about it?
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Jesus you people....
How many times have the numbers been posted of those who gave up looking for work? I posted four or five links just yesterday on this very topic,one even from the HuffingPaint post.
We know they aren't counted among the unemployed so that skews those numbers in a huge way.
The numbers are fake. If you're not smart enough to figure that out you're hopeless.
If the same measurements are used in who they count and who they don't count, back in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2014 etc.... then the COMPARISON of U/E numbers is accurate... period.
YOU want to now CHANGE the measurements, MID STREAM, and want to count work force participation numbers in the total of our U/E numbers now...
WHEN they were never in those U/E numbers for the past 15 years, in the least.
Why would you want to fudge and change numbers mid stream, where we could not compare accurately, compare apples to apples?
Work force numbers with participation rates, have been measured by them selves for the last 15 plus years as well, and we can see by those numbers that the participation rate is going down....BUT THAT is a separate measurement, has been a separate measurement, and should stay a separate measurement instead of getting lost in U/E numbers if you incorporated it with U/E.
Pretty soon you can expect this CORRUPT unethical brain dead party in power to start saying Unemployment is down at 5%.
They will LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE just like they did last election.
"I said I would end the Iraq War and I have."
I'd list the 50 other lies but this one's the most intuitive.
U6 Unemployment Rate MacroTrendsYou are missing the point....What's dense about it?
And yet another repeat lie.
Good God you people are dense.
If the precise measures for Unemployment are used each and every year, in 2004 or right now, regardless if you agree with the way they measure it as long as the standard is the same, then the charts are showing an apples to apples comparison.....which is the only sane way and legit way to compare anything....so what is it that you say, is a lie Here We Go?
Jesus you people....
How many times have the numbers been posted of those who gave up looking for work? I posted four or five links just yesterday on this very topic,one even from the HuffingPaint post.
We know they aren't counted among the unemployed so that skews those numbers in a huge way.
The numbers are fake. If you're not smart enough to figure that out you're hopeless.
If the same measurements are used in who they count and who they don't count, back in 2000, 2004, 2008, 2014 etc.... then the COMPARISON of U/E numbers is accurate... period.
YOU want to now CHANGE the measurements, MID STREAM, and want to count work force participation numbers in the total of our U/E numbers now...
WHEN they were never in those U/E numbers for the past 15 years, in the least.
Why would you want to fudge and change numbers mid stream, where we could not compare accurately, compare apples to apples?
Work force numbers with participation rates, have been measured by them selves for the last 15 plus years as well, and we can see by those numbers that the participation rate is going down....BUT THAT is a separate measurement, has been a separate measurement, and should stay a separate measurement instead of getting lost in U/E numbers if you incorporated it with U/E.
Did you read where I said they've been relatively parallel in the past????
I don't think you're grasping it.
So you're actually suggesting democratic strategists use this website to sway elections?Advertisers use a very basic subliminal psychology to make you buy products. It's by putting a message in your face over and over.
Democrats have been using the internet to spin lies for two elections now.
You can see Candy Man and others use them here.
Type a completely false statement in a title and let the dissenters reply away. Truth and debate don't matter, but replies to the thread serve the goal; bump the lie over and over so undecided voters see the lie over and over. Most people don't read threads, but they see the titles every day.
You don't believe me? Just read how Candy states her FALSE thread title that Obama dropped gas prices, then admits he didn't, then repeats the lie, then admits he didn't, then repeats the lie, back and forth, while the real goal has nothing to do with honest debate. The goal is only to bump the LIE, lol.
Dotcommie has done the same in her threads.
The key is to respond to the lie, but not IN their threads.
You know when you've come across this special type thread when the OP admits it over and over RIGHT IN THE THREAD. LOL
Now flame away dumb ass liberals....I look forward to you bumping MY thread title! Wahahahahahahahaa
Pretty soon you can expect this CORRUPT unethical brain dead party in power to start saying Unemployment is down at 5%.
They will LIE LIE LIE LIE LIE just like they did last election.
"I said I would end the Iraq War and I have."
I'd list the 50 other lies but this one's the most intuitive.
So, you are saying that the BLS, which is independent, is lying.
And we killed OBL under Obama's watch. Fact.
Ummmm, I think the Navy SEALs would have an issue with you saying WE....
just saying
