Bad News Warmers

[ClosedCaption]

This is a complete joke. Just because 2012 was the coolest of the decade, it is not representative of the global warming data trend. A cold year is not an indication the pattern has changed. This is a classic case of cherry picking data to fit an agenda.

This shit isn't even an American issue. The large majority of the INTERNATIONAL scientific community believes in man made global warming. Give it a rest.

yes, we need to look at trends. there are no long term warming trends that can be directly correlated to the actions of human beings. Every new piece of data discredits the theories of the "international scientific" community. Face it, they are putting forth THEORIES that they cannot prove with actual data.

AGW is a hoax. Algore is a fraud. and you silly assholes are making him richer every day. You are idiots.

If you're so unimpressed by the theories of AGW, then why are you so quick to advocate for the theory that it is a hoax?

 

[edthecynic]

NOAA's attempt to lie again is destroyed by their own data.

What Global Warming? 2012 Data Confirms Earth In Cooling Trend | CNS News

Why must liberals lie about everything????????? Is it genetic?

It proves nothing to call 2012 "the coolest of the warmest". It seems to indicate is that you're willing to accept anything, as long as it fits your bias. All that's confirmed in is that CNS is a political outlet with logic and science taking a backseat to their agenda and you're swallowing it whole.

The article said the 7th coolest of the warmest!!!!

 

[Redfish]

While the parrots on the right continue to deny climate change and the warming of our oceans, leaders in all coastal communities around the world are planning decades into the future to protect our posterity.

It's sad and hilarious that the OP is so sure of his opinion he posts what is basically an editorial from a clearly partisan source and thinks, err excuse me, believes human activity cannot impact our climate.

OK, engage your small mind and pay attention.

NO ONE IS SAYING THAT THE CLIMATE OF EARTH IS NOT CHANGING, IT HAS BEEN CHANGING FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS AND WILL BE CHANGING MILLIONS OF YEARS FROM NOW. MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT AND NEVER WILL.

You are buying into a hoax that is designed to increase the government's control over every aspect of our lives under the false premise of "saving the planet". Its bullshit, wake up and smell reality.

I believe you are buying into a hoax that is designed to protect coal producers and the oil cartel. Your argument is ridiculous on its face. Maybe you could explain why so many are so concerned about pollution and its impact on the environment and why you are not?

Pollution and global warming are two totally different things. Everyone is concerned about pollution, but not everyone thinks that pollution creates global warming. We have made great strides on reducing pollution in this country, and thats a good thing.

you lefties always want to draw a cause and effect relationship between pollution and warming-----but its just not there, no matter how much you wish for it, the data says otherwise.

Even if the planet is going through a warming phase, there is no proof that the acts of man have caused it, could reverse it, or stop it.

 

[Decus]

"The modern meltdown of the Antarctic Ice Sheet mirrors the frozen continent's big thaw after the last ice age ended 20,000 years ago, a new study finds."

West Antarctica Warmed Quickly ... 20,000 Years Ago | LiveScience

"The addition of these new findings were added to the most recent and best accepted climate change models and produced more accurate results compared to measurement than have been previously seen."

Climate change first: Ice sheets melt from below - National Paeleontology | Examiner.com

Climate change seems to have so many influences. Funny but also it seems to have happened before. Could we be watching a repeat?

 

[Redfish]

"The modern meltdown of the Antarctic Ice Sheet mirrors the frozen continent's big thaw after the last ice age ended 20,000 years ago, a new study finds."

West Antarctica Warmed Quickly ... 20,000 Years Ago | LiveScience

"The addition of these new findings were added to the most recent and best accepted climate change models and produced more accurate results compared to measurement than have been previously seen."

Climate change first: Ice sheets melt from below - National Paeleontology | Examiner.com

Climate change seems to have so many influences. Funny but also it seems to have happened before. Could we be watching a repeat?

20,000 years ago--------no SUVs, coal fired power plants, or diesel 18 wheelers----but somehow in the mind of liberals ,man did it.

 

[edthecynic]

OK, engage your small mind and pay attention.

NO ONE IS SAYING THAT THE CLIMATE OF EARTH IS NOT CHANGING, IT HAS BEEN CHANGING FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS AND WILL BE CHANGING MILLIONS OF YEARS FROM NOW. MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT AND NEVER WILL.

You are buying into a hoax that is designed to increase the government's control over every aspect of our lives under the false premise of "saving the planet". Its bullshit, wake up and smell reality.

I believe you are buying into a hoax that is designed to protect coal producers and the oil cartel. Your argument is ridiculous on its face. Maybe you could explain why so many are so concerned about pollution and its impact on the environment and why you are not?

Pollution and global warming are two totally different things. Everyone is concerned about pollution, but not everyone thinks that pollution creates global warming. We have made great strides on reducing pollution in this country, and thats a good thing.

you lefties always want to draw a cause and effect relationship between pollution and warming-----but its just not there, no matter how much you wish for it, the data says otherwise.

Even if the planet is going through a warming phase, there is no proof that the acts of man have caused it, could reverse it, or stop it.

Pollution is man effecting the atmosphere. You do not deny man can effect the atmosphere with pollution, but you deny man can effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.

If man can effect the atmosphere with polution, then why can't man effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses????????

 

[Redfish]

I believe you are buying into a hoax that is designed to protect coal producers and the oil cartel. Your argument is ridiculous on its face. Maybe you could explain why so many are so concerned about pollution and its impact on the environment and why you are not?

Pollution and global warming are two totally different things. Everyone is concerned about pollution, but not everyone thinks that pollution creates global warming. We have made great strides on reducing pollution in this country, and thats a good thing.

you lefties always want to draw a cause and effect relationship between pollution and warming-----but its just not there, no matter how much you wish for it, the data says otherwise.

Even if the planet is going through a warming phase, there is no proof that the acts of man have caused it, could reverse it, or stop it.

Pollution is man effecting the atmosphere. You do not deny man can effect the atmosphere with pollution, but you deny man can effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.

If man can effect the atmosphere with polution, then why can't man effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses????????

the affects of man on the atmosphere are tiny and temporary.

We agree that polluting the environment is bad. Look at the great lakes, 40 years ago they were lifeless from pollution, now they are alive and full of marine life.

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a naturally occuring gas that makes up less than 1% of the atmosphere.

to claim that a slight increase in CO2 would permantently change the climate of the planet us foolishness.

 

[BlindBoo]

Pollution and global warming are two totally different things. Everyone is concerned about pollution, but not everyone thinks that pollution creates global warming. We have made great strides on reducing pollution in this country, and thats a good thing.

you lefties always want to draw a cause and effect relationship between pollution and warming-----but its just not there, no matter how much you wish for it, the data says otherwise.

Even if the planet is going through a warming phase, there is no proof that the acts of man have caused it, could reverse it, or stop it.

Pollution is man effecting the atmosphere. You do not deny man can effect the atmosphere with pollution, but you deny man can effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.

If man can effect the atmosphere with polution, then why can't man effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses????????

the affects of man on the atmosphere are tiny and temporary.

We agree that polluting the environment is bad. Look at the great lakes, 40 years ago they were lifeless from pollution, now they are alive and full of marine life.

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a naturally occuring gas that makes up less than 1% of the atmosphere.

to claim that a slight increase in CO2 would permantently change the climate of the planet us foolishness.

What climate model did you use to base that opinion on?

 

[Redfish]

Pollution is man effecting the atmosphere. You do not deny man can effect the atmosphere with pollution, but you deny man can effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses.

If man can effect the atmosphere with polution, then why can't man effect the atmosphere with greenhouse gasses????????

the affects of man on the atmosphere are tiny and temporary.

We agree that polluting the environment is bad. Look at the great lakes, 40 years ago they were lifeless from pollution, now they are alive and full of marine life.

CO2 is not a pollutant, it is a naturally occuring gas that makes up less than 1% of the atmosphere.

to claim that a slight increase in CO2 would permantently change the climate of the planet us foolishness.

What climate model did you use to base that opinion on?

Why use a "model" when the actual data supports what I am saying?

But if you want a model, give me a govt grant of 5 million and I will create a model that will "prove" whatever theory you choose.

 

[Wry Catcher]

"The modern meltdown of the Antarctic Ice Sheet mirrors the frozen continent's big thaw after the last ice age ended 20,000 years ago, a new study finds."

West Antarctica Warmed Quickly ... 20,000 Years Ago | LiveScience

"The addition of these new findings were added to the most recent and best accepted climate change models and produced more accurate results compared to measurement than have been previously seen."

Climate change first: Ice sheets melt from below - National Paeleontology | Examiner.com

Climate change seems to have so many influences. Funny but also it seems to have happened before. Could we be watching a repeat?

20,000 years ago--------no SUVs, coal fired power plants, or diesel 18 wheelers----but somehow in the mind of liberals ,man did it.

Even IF coal and oil production are not the only cause to our planets warming, can you deny both coal and oil pollute the planet? You are free to agree with the minority and continue to post your opinion without regard for the possibility that your opinion may aid in the (irreparable?) harm to our planet and to our posterity.

But what if you're wrong?

Seems to me it is pretty damn myopic to not mitigate the pollution of big oil and big coal for both reasons - the health of our air and water and the possibility regulations will mitigate climate change.

Methinks if you and CrusaderFrank determined medical practice we would still be bleeding patients and autopsy would be outlawed as an affront to God's creation.

 

[RDD_1210]

While the parrots on the right continue to deny climate change and the warming of our oceans, leaders in all coastal communities around the world are planning decades into the future to protect our posterity.

It's sad and hilarious that the OP is so sure of his opinion he posts what is basically an editorial from a clearly partisan source and thinks, err excuse me, believes human activity cannot impact our climate.

OK, engage your small mind and pay attention.

NO ONE IS SAYING THAT THE CLIMATE OF EARTH IS NOT CHANGING, IT HAS BEEN CHANGING FOR MILLIONS OF YEARS AND WILL BE CHANGING MILLIONS OF YEARS FROM NOW. MAN HAS NEVER HAD ANYTHING TO DO WITH IT AND NEVER WILL.

You are buying into a hoax that is designed to increase the government's control over every aspect of our lives under the false premise of "saving the planet". Its bullshit, wake up and smell reality.

So pretty much EVERY international scientific agency that has ever performed research in to this subject are all either wrong OR working together to pull a fast one on you? Is that really what you're claiming?

 

[FJO]

"The modern meltdown of the Antarctic Ice Sheet mirrors the frozen continent's big thaw after the last ice age ended 20,000 years ago, a new study finds."

West Antarctica Warmed Quickly ... 20,000 Years Ago | LiveScience

"The addition of these new findings were added to the most recent and best accepted climate change models and produced more accurate results compared to measurement than have been previously seen."

Climate change first: Ice sheets melt from below - National Paeleontology | Examiner.com

Climate change seems to have so many influences. Funny but also it seems to have happened before. Could we be watching a repeat?

20,000 years ago--------no SUVs, coal fired power plants, or diesel 18 wheelers----but somehow in the mind of liberals ,man did it.

Even IF coal and oil production are not the only cause to our planets warming, can you deny both coal and oil pollute the planet? You are free to agree with the minority and continue to post your opinion without regard for the possibility that your opinion may aid in the (irreparable?) harm to our planet and to our posterity.

But what if you're wrong?

Seems to me it is pretty damn myopic to not mitigate the pollution of big oil and big coal for both reasons - the health of our air and water and the possibility regulations will mitigate climate change.

Methinks if you and CrusaderFrank determined medical practice we would still be bleeding patients and autopsy would be outlawed as an affront to God's creation.

Carbon dioxide is plant food. As all living things, plants take advantage of more available food. So, if there is more CO2 in the air, the happier plants are, because they have more food, and the more they will 'eat'. And they show their appreciation by releasing more oxygen - which is good for us - as the result of their gluttony.

Hey, we are all winners.

But we must remember to be careful and learn from historical examples. Those SUV's and manufacturing plants and coal burning electric generation plants and refrigerators and air-conditioners and cars and trucks and airplanes, 10,000 or so years ago sure played havoc with the mile deep/high ice the Earth was covered with.

 

[RDD_1210]

20,000 years ago--------no SUVs, coal fired power plants, or diesel 18 wheelers----but somehow in the mind of liberals ,man did it.

Even IF coal and oil production are not the only cause to our planets warming, can you deny both coal and oil pollute the planet? You are free to agree with the minority and continue to post your opinion without regard for the possibility that your opinion may aid in the (irreparable?) harm to our planet and to our posterity.

But what if you're wrong?

Seems to me it is pretty damn myopic to not mitigate the pollution of big oil and big coal for both reasons - the health of our air and water and the possibility regulations will mitigate climate change.

Methinks if you and CrusaderFrank determined medical practice we would still be bleeding patients and autopsy would be outlawed as an affront to God's creation.

Carbon dioxide is plant food. As all living things, plants take advantage of more available food. So, if there is more CO2 in the air, the happier plants are, because they have more food, and the more they will 'eat'. And they show their appreciation by releasing more oxygen - which is good for us - as the result of their gluttony.

Hey, we are all winners.

But we must remember to be careful and learn from historical examples. Those SUV's and manufacturing plants and coal burning electric generation plants and refrigerators and air-conditioners and cars and trucks and airplanes, 10,000 or so years ago sure played havoc with the mile deep/high ice the Earth was covered with.

Seriously?

So infinite carbon dioxide must be ideal. Right??!

 

[FJO]

Even IF coal and oil production are not the only cause to our planets warming, can you deny both coal and oil pollute the planet? You are free to agree with the minority and continue to post your opinion without regard for the possibility that your opinion may aid in the (irreparable?) harm to our planet and to our posterity.

But what if you're wrong?

Seems to me it is pretty damn myopic to not mitigate the pollution of big oil and big coal for both reasons - the health of our air and water and the possibility regulations will mitigate climate change.

Methinks if you and CrusaderFrank determined medical practice we would still be bleeding patients and autopsy would be outlawed as an affront to God's creation.

Carbon dioxide is plant food. As all living things, plants take advantage of more available food. So, if there is more CO2 in the air, the happier plants are, because they have more food, and the more they will 'eat'. And they show their appreciation by releasing more oxygen - which is good for us - as the result of their gluttony.

Hey, we are all winners.

But we must remember to be careful and learn from historical examples. Those SUV's and manufacturing plants and coal burning electric generation plants and refrigerators and air-conditioners and cars and trucks and airplanes, 10,000 or so years ago sure played havoc with the mile deep/high ice the Earth was covered with.

Seriously?

So infinite carbon dioxide must be ideal. Right??!

Since human population and - presumably - any natural activity that produces carbon dioxide is nowhere near 'infinity' your question is meaningless.

 

[TemplarKormac]

NOAA's attempt to lie again is destroyed by their own data.

What Global Warming? 2012 Data Confirms Earth In Cooling Trend | CNS News

Why must liberals lie about everything????????? Is it genetic?

You have to love the CON$ervoFascist Brotherhood "logic." The article states that 2012 was the 8th WARMEST year and the decade ending 2012 was the WARMEST decade in the history of direct instrument measurement and to them that is a COOLING trend!!!!

Wow. Not only did you not rebut the article, you went as far as to call the OP a conservofascist.

Not only are you wrong, you are lying.

First, there's the sea ice data:

Sea Ice News Volume 4 #3 ? 2013 Sea Ice Forecast Contest | Watts Up With That?

And then there's the tree ring data:

This is what global cooling really looks like ? new tree ring study shows 2000 years of cooling ? previous studies underestimated temperatures of Roman and Medieval Warm Periods | Watts Up With That?

For the past 2000 years there has been a gradual cooling trend, much to the chagrin of global warming alarmists everywhere. Scientists from the Johannes Gutenberg-Universität Mainz in Germany were able to last year precisely reconstruct the climate of Northern Europe dating back 20 centuries. It showed a *gasp* cooling trend.

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

https://iptllc-nycny877xxxxxx.pbworks.com/w/page/52335344/General City Information
Global warming claims 'based on false data' - Telegraph
Global Warming: True or False? | Fox Business Video

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

The American Spectator : The False Alert of Global Warming

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

National Geographic says that Global Warming may be false

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

THE IPCC’S FALSE EVIDENCE OF MAN-MADE WARMING

 

[LadyGunSlinger]

New NASA Data Blow Gaping Hole In Global Warming Alarmism