Asked and ye shall receive
Black Self-Segregation as a Cause of Housing Segregation: Evidence from the Multi-City Study of Urban Inequality
http://www.phil.frb.org/research-an...iew/2007/q4/defina_segregated-communities.pdf...
Don't bring a knife to a gun fight.
LOL , you didn't even bring a knife, you bought a spoon!
From your own link:
"Results suggest that black self-segregation plays a statistically significant, albeit minor role in explaining housing segregation."
Compare that to this and you will see how laughable your comparison and post is:
Racial segregation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
LOL , you didn't even bring a knife, you bought a spoon!
From your own link:
"Results suggest that black self-segregation plays a statistically significant, albeit minor role in explaining housing segregation."
Compare that to this and you will see how laughable your comparison and post is:
Racial segregation in the United States - Wikipedia, the free encyclopedia
Self-imposed Segregation On U.s. College Campuses - Philly.com
There is a report on the cbs news website which appears to be down right now. It is entitled "going home to the south"...The piece discusses among other things the willingness of blacks to self segregate.
Look, don't argue with me on this. The phenomenon exists. It has been well documented.
There is no further discussion required. This falls under the category of "It is what it is"..Deal with it.
The GOP's problem is that women can think for themselves. Has been for 5 of the last 6 general elections where the GOP has lost the popular vote.
Pretty hilarious.
Lets look at this another way:
Republicans "do for yourself" mantra is the principals they stand by
[
You bolded the part about jobs leaving the country due to unions and taxes. So tell me, why is there no longer a textile industry in the USA? why is there no longer a commercial shipbuilding industry in the USA? Why are all TVs and computers made out of the USA?
OH, I know, corporate greed---------------
Well, let's look at that.
Why aren't TV's made in the US anymore? Because back in the 1970's the Japanese engaged in a practice known as "Dumping"- selling their product here at damn well near a loss.
In fact, it got so bad that Japanese tourists would by TV's and VCR's in the US in the 1980's and take them back to Japan at a bargain.
And while he couldn't move fast enough to save Zenith and RCA and Motorola, Reagan did put the Kaybosh on Dumping cars, forcing the Japanese to open plants here, paying our taxes and matching our union wages.
Of course, that's when Republicans used to put the interest of America above that of Corporations.
I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship. Just as an aside, I think what you ignore (and most Republicans do too) is religion. Talk about imposing one's views on another...that is basically all Rick Santorum wanted to do. If you have Netflix, check out the Romney campaign video; women not named Ann speak for something like 15 seconds; its the patriarchal family structure the GOP wants to impose on the Country that the younger women reject. My buddy is comfortable with it; her daughters are not. They're single, college grads, into their careers, basically the cast of HBO's Girls.
I personally feel that the GOP is a bunch of scared folks who, understandably, reason as follows: We had a much more economically prosperous country when we had this patriarchy in place across the nation so we need to go back to those days when girls wore skirts, guys were never challenged by their girlfriend/wife, and everyone knew their place. Since that dynamic has changed and is not coming back...we get the "we're going to hell in a hand basket" threads.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
I go to the range every other week, usually to train with which ever side arm is up in the rotation, at any of several ranges.
30 years ago, it was not unlikely that you'd see a woman at the range, but odds were if you did, she was with her boyfriend, and you rarely saw her twice.
Today, you will see women at the range every day, without fail and it is not uncommon that the women will be the majority of shooters.
Women are not anti-gun, they're anti-getting their assed kicked.
Now here's another stat for ya: Women are moving out of states which prevent or stringently control the ownership and effective use of a firearm, TO STATES THAT DO NOT.
It seems that even though it took a while for them to figure it out, that women are coming to understand that the Daddy-State isn't even as good as their abusive husband in protecting them and that "State Agencies" who claim to protect women are counter productive, often wrecking families, stripping them of their children and abusing them in worse ways than the alcoholic asshole they shacked up with. So they're turning from the Daddy State and back to Daddy, where their bread is buttered and taste the sweetest, for the longest, hedging their bets with a dainty ACP and High-cap Mag.
The addled old hags of the NAGS are still out there, obviously, but they're dyin' off leaving nothing behind but their cats and their lies.
I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship. Just as an aside, I think what you ignore (and most Republicans do too) is religion. Talk about imposing one's views on another...that is basically all Rick Santorum wanted to do. If you have Netflix, check out the Romney campaign video; women not named Ann speak for something like 15 seconds; its the patriarchal family structure the GOP wants to impose on the Country that the younger women reject. My buddy is comfortable with it; her daughters are not. They're single, college grads, into their careers, basically the cast of HBO's Girls.
I personally feel that the GOP is a bunch of scared folks who, understandably, reason as follows: We had a much more economically prosperous country when we had this patriarchy in place across the nation so we need to go back to those days when girls wore skirts, guys were never challenged by their girlfriend/wife, and everyone knew their place. Since that dynamic has changed and is not coming back...we get the "we're going to hell in a hand basket" threads.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
typical liberal twit making unfounded assumptions again. if I meant impose I would have said impose. but we all know all you are capable of doing is spinning your own interpretation into everything.
here's something else you need to get used to. The NRA has not only helped keep more senseless laws off the books, it's now going to push to get the restricting laws in existence removed.
Candy not every woman is an irresponsible slut who needs to use abortion as a from of birth control. to the majority of the sensible women out there. abortion is such a non issue. the fact that you really think it is an election winning issue shows how much of a filthy gutter tramp you are. you keep right on ripping fetuses out of your uterus. no one wants more of your kind around here anyway.
I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship. Just as an aside, I think what you ignore (and most Republicans do too) is religion. Talk about imposing one's views on another...that is basically all Rick Santorum wanted to do. If you have Netflix, check out the Romney campaign video; women not named Ann speak for something like 15 seconds; its the patriarchal family structure the GOP wants to impose on the Country that the younger women reject. My buddy is comfortable with it; her daughters are not. They're single, college grads, into their careers, basically the cast of HBO's Girls.
I personally feel that the GOP is a bunch of scared folks who, understandably, reason as follows: We had a much more economically prosperous country when we had this patriarchy in place across the nation so we need to go back to those days when girls wore skirts, guys were never challenged by their girlfriend/wife, and everyone knew their place. Since that dynamic has changed and is not coming back...we get the "we're going to hell in a hand basket" threads.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
typical liberal twit making unfounded assumptions again. if I meant impose I would have said impose. but we all know all you are capable of doing is spinning your own interpretation into everything.
here's something else you need to get used to. The NRA has not only helped keep more senseless laws off the books, it's now going to push to get the restricting laws in existence removed.
Candy not every woman is an irresponsible slut who needs to use abortion as a from of birth control. to the majority of the sensible women out there. abortion is such a non issue. the fact that you really think it is an election winning issue shows how much of a filthy gutter tramp you are. you keep right on ripping fetuses out of your uterus. no one wants more of your kind around here anyway.
Nice now say that to Israel because they offer abortion on Demand for Free. Now watch how smooth "we dont want your kind around" goes over with that bunch.
BTW...Keep it classy. When you have nothing you always can hide behind insults...because thats what children do
40 years ago....If I try to tell my wife for whom to vote she would give me "the look"...
I just assumed you wished to write a statement that made sense.I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship. Just as an aside, I think what you ignore (and most Republicans do too) is religion. Talk about imposing one's views on another...that is basically all Rick Santorum wanted to do. If you have Netflix, check out the Romney campaign video; women not named Ann speak for something like 15 seconds; its the patriarchal family structure the GOP wants to impose on the Country that the younger women reject. My buddy is comfortable with it; her daughters are not. They're single, college grads, into their careers, basically the cast of HBO's Girls.
I personally feel that the GOP is a bunch of scared folks who, understandably, reason as follows: We had a much more economically prosperous country when we had this patriarchy in place across the nation so we need to go back to those days when girls wore skirts, guys were never challenged by their girlfriend/wife, and everyone knew their place. Since that dynamic has changed and is not coming back...we get the "we're going to hell in a hand basket" threads.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
typical liberal twit making unfounded assumptions again. if I meant impose I would have said impose. but we all know all you are capable of doing is spinning your own interpretation into everything.
Very few women are irresponsible sluts; at least as many irresponsible males who, of course, are never indicted...you always blame the females. It's okay...it's the conservative in you.
It would be a non issue if the conservatives would simply abide by the Roe decision instead of putting up all of the obstacles they have erected. But every time you do it, those that empathize find another reason to wonder aloud..."why am I a republican"
It has been shown to be an issue where the GOP has no standing. You are either ignorant of history or ignorant in general...take your pick.
I'm sure Mitt said the same thing right up until 11/6/2012
Of course I've never said that. You have to make up what you think I said so your can "trump" me.
You can look it up if you like.
As a trailer trash redneck, you seem to be taking this personally.
I just assumed you wished to write a statement that made sense.I'm sure you meant impose.
Yet somehow the House of Representatives (the anti-thesis to Obama) has single digit approval ratings. Hmmm. Apparently you're out on that limb by yourself.
Nonsense. I'm anti machine gun. I'm anti- the thought that whatever Private Jane Doe has access to....private citizen Jane Doe should have access to the same weaponry. It's pure craziness.
No, it's what your lazy research imposes (or infringes) on those you disagree with.
I know several female gun owners--one of them is my training buddy--hates Obama's guts. Her daughters (also own guns) all could not like Obama more. It's, by no means, an A=B relationship. Just as an aside, I think what you ignore (and most Republicans do too) is religion. Talk about imposing one's views on another...that is basically all Rick Santorum wanted to do. If you have Netflix, check out the Romney campaign video; women not named Ann speak for something like 15 seconds; its the patriarchal family structure the GOP wants to impose on the Country that the younger women reject. My buddy is comfortable with it; her daughters are not. They're single, college grads, into their careers, basically the cast of HBO's Girls.
I personally feel that the GOP is a bunch of scared folks who, understandably, reason as follows: We had a much more economically prosperous country when we had this patriarchy in place across the nation so we need to go back to those days when girls wore skirts, guys were never challenged by their girlfriend/wife, and everyone knew their place. Since that dynamic has changed and is not coming back...we get the "we're going to hell in a hand basket" threads.
The NRA lobby effectively kept sensible gun laws off of the books. That much is true.
Keep in mind the states on the left are NOT all states he won. He lost Arizona and North Carolina's EV's. But somehow won the women's votes in those states.
Ohio, Pennsylvania, Michigan, and Wisconsin by more than double digits!!! Presumably some of those women were gun owners or sympathetic to gun ownership rights. Yet Romney was powerless.
Running the Marlboro man in 2016 will likely help since Romney didn't embody gun ownership much more than Obama did but
The women's vote is a democratic stronghold and until you guys realize it's all about Roe, you'll never win the vote.
*dropping the mike*
typical liberal twit making unfounded assumptions again. if I meant impose I would have said impose. but we all know all you are capable of doing is spinning your own interpretation into everything.
Makes sense
Very few women are irresponsible sluts; at least as many irresponsible males who, of course, are never indicted...you always blame the females. It's okay...it's the conservative in you.
Anyway...women who know the pain and ramifications of child birth are often the biggest advocates for the need to protect reproductive rights.
It would be a non issue if the conservatives would simply abide by the Roe decision instead of putting up all of the obstacles they have erected. But every time you do it, those that empathize find another reason to wonder aloud..."why am I a republican"
It has been shown to be an issue where the GOP has no standing. You are either ignorant of history or ignorant in general...take your pick.
Again, I couldn't have written a better example of why the GOP is so brain-dead on women's issues. Are You sure you're not a liberal?
I just assumed you wished to write a statement that made sense.
Makes sense
Very few women are irresponsible sluts; at least as many irresponsible males who, of course, are never indicted...you always blame the females. It's okay...it's the conservative in you.
Anyway...women who know the pain and ramifications of child birth are often the biggest advocates for the need to protect reproductive rights.
It would be a non issue if the conservatives would simply abide by the Roe decision instead of putting up all of the obstacles they have erected. But every time you do it, those that empathize find another reason to wonder aloud..."why am I a republican"
It has been shown to be an issue where the GOP has no standing. You are either ignorant of history or ignorant in general...take your pick.
Again, I couldn't have written a better example of why the GOP is so brain-dead on women's issues. Are You sure you're not a liberal?
again, if you had a clue, it would make sense to you. your short comings are not my problem.
interesting thing, my wife went out to dinner with 4 friends tonight. I asked them who voted for Obama. 3 did 2 didn't. I asked them why they voted for Obama and these were the responses. I heard Romney was going to outsource more jobs. I didn't like sarah palin ??? never got a clear answer why that impacted her vote the 2nd time. and finally, I thought he was trying to do a good job for the country. I asked all 5 if they thought republicans were trying to impact womens reproductive rights. that took a little explaining to let them know I was asking were republicans trying to take away womens rights to birth control and abortion. I also asked if so would this issue prevent you from voting republican. well none of them even knew who Sandra fluke was. they knew republicans were anti abortion but didn't think they were trying to stop it. one even said , I don't remember bush ever trying to stop abortion. I got a where did you hear republicans were trying to stop birth control? I showed them some of the lunacy going on here. which got a few nice lol's. but it looks to me like the only ones worried about the republicans trying to impact womens rights are koolaid drinking, brain washed liberal twits like yourself. seriously candy. no one is buying your shit. what self respecting woman is even focused on the fact that they might not be able to run out and get an abortion tomorrow.
educate yourself man!
