Anyone remember when Obama told US that NASA and space travel was a thing of the past and needed more Muslim outreach?

[daveman]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

 

[edthecynic]

Then when Clinton was in office, getting diddled by Monica, he sold Saudi Arabia some more F-15s.

I notice that you didn't include Tramp's 8 BILLION ARMS DEAL with Saudi Prince Mohammed BONE SAW!!!!!
How come????
Also you don't seem to mind Tramp being diddled by a porn star!!!

 

[edthecynic]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

No one remembers because it never happened. But we do remember REAGAN'S NASA Muslim outreach which actually DID happen!!!!!

Obummer retired the STS early so that we had to rely on his master, pootin to get to space. So, yeah, we remember you feckless asshole.

Notice how the Trump Nazis change the subject when their lies are exposed!!!

Yes, the lies always seem to come from you. Yes or no, obummer retired the STS early?

Still desperately trying to change the subject!
Yes or now, Reagan started the Muslim outreach by NASA?

 

[edthecynic]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

No one remembers because it never happened. But we do remember REAGAN'S NASA Muslim outreach which actually DID happen!!!!!

No, it didn't.

LIAR!
From a Right-wing source no less!
see the Muslim in his Muslin garb for the NASA photo!!!!!

Reagan/Bush Used NASA for Muslim Outreach Before Obama

www.debbieschlussel.com

“Payload Specialist” Prince Sultan: Reagan/Bush Beat Obama to the Muslim NASA Outreach Punch

In fact, the Obama administration is not the first to waste tax-funded NASA resources and space program on Muslims. Ronald Reagan and his VP, George H. W. Bush, were. But they just wouldn’t say so publicly.

Hiring an astronaut is "Muslim outreach"? Yeah, not really.

How many Muslims did Obama's NASA put in orbit? None.

He wasn't an astronaut, so yes it WAS Muslim outreach.
From my posted link by a well known Right-winger:
"There were exhibits all over the Cap Center party honoring Prince Sultan’s space trip. And, at the time, everyone in the U.S. space program knew what a joke it was, what an obvious sop to the Saudis, given that the Prince didn’t have an iota of the years of training and skill it takes to become an American astronaut. He had the title of “payload specialist,” but the only payload for which he was actually skilled was “pay the lady.” Only months earlier, the Prince was the acting Saudi Information Minister and had zero space knowledge."

 

[Mikeoxenormous]

Then when Clinton was in office, getting diddled by Monica, he sold Saudi Arabia some more F-15s.

I notice that you didn't include Tramp's 8 BILLION ARMS DEAL with Saudi Prince Mohammed BONE SAW!!!!!
How come????
Also you don't seem to mind Tramp being diddled by a porn star!!!

And?

So did the Kennedy's, Clinton's and others liberal elites, and back then Donald J Trump chummed up with the Clintons....We on the right arent hypocrite like the #MeToo movement...We can forgive people who have sinned, we just can forgive people who are EVIL...

 

[daveman]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

 

[daveman]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

No one remembers because it never happened. But we do remember REAGAN'S NASA Muslim outreach which actually DID happen!!!!!

No, it didn't.

LIAR!
From a Right-wing source no less!
see the Muslim in his Muslin garb for the NASA photo!!!!!

Reagan/Bush Used NASA for Muslim Outreach Before Obama

www.debbieschlussel.com

“Payload Specialist” Prince Sultan: Reagan/Bush Beat Obama to the Muslim NASA Outreach Punch

In fact, the Obama administration is not the first to waste tax-funded NASA resources and space program on Muslims. Ronald Reagan and his VP, George H. W. Bush, were. But they just wouldn’t say so publicly.

Hiring an astronaut is "Muslim outreach"? Yeah, not really.

How many Muslims did Obama's NASA put in orbit? None.

He wasn't an astronaut, so yes it WAS Muslim outreach.
From my posted link by a well known Right-winger:
"There were exhibits all over the Cap Center party honoring Prince Sultan’s space trip. And, at the time, everyone in the U.S. space program knew what a joke it was, what an obvious sop to the Saudis, given that the Prince didn’t have an iota of the years of training and skill it takes to become an American astronaut. He had the title of “payload specialist,” but the only payload for which he was actually skilled was “pay the lady.” Only months earlier, the Prince was the acting Saudi Information Minister and had zero space knowledge."

Whoopty shit. Obama didn't even make a token effort to get anyone into space. He cancelled the STS.

Putting people and equipment into space is a space agency's job...not sucking up to the Muslim world.

Obama was a lousy President. I don't care if you worship his stuttering incompetence. Your anger is absolutely meaningless.

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

 

[daveman]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

Oh. Then you're claiming a reusable booster is less efficient than a booster that has to be built from scratch every time.

Oooookay.

 

[White 6]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

 

[daveman]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

You're irrationally angry about this. It works, and it works well. Your approval is neither sought nor required.

 

[White 6]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

You're irrationally angry about this. It works, and it works well. Your approval is neither sought nor required.

What works, landing a spent booster that has thousands more parts prone to failure. Sure it works but how much more powerful does it make for the mission?

Answer power is reduced by the thousands of parts that all have weight and reduce thrust.

Play on

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.

Again little one, when you add thousands more parts the possibility for failure of those parts goes up. The weight of these parts also reduces thrust. The boosters are irrelevant after separation, and unless you are retarded you will know that thousands of less parts is cheaper to rebuild.

LOL as if we can't build our own boosters.

You will babble until everyone dies because of a more complicated than need be booster failure.

Less parts more reliability. Besides nothing has changed since Apollo, still lighting a match under a bomb. Astronauts are morons

 

[White 6]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.

Again little one, when you ass thousands more parts the possibility for failure of those parts goes up. The weight of these parts also reduces thrust. The boosters are irrelevant after separation, and unless you are retarded you will know that thousands of less parts is cheaper to rebuild.

LOL as if we can't build our own boosters.

You will babble until everyone dies because of a more complicated than need be booster failure.

Less parts more reliability. Besides nothing has changed since Apollo, still lighting a match under a bomb. Astronauts are morons

I simply do not presume to tell Elon Musk how to run his business. What did you say your degrees are in, again?

 

[esalla]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.

Again little one, when you ass thousands more parts the possibility for failure of those parts goes up. The weight of these parts also reduces thrust. The boosters are irrelevant after separation, and unless you are retarded you will know that thousands of less parts is cheaper to rebuild.

LOL as if we can't build our own boosters.

You will babble until everyone dies because of a more complicated than need be booster failure.

Less parts more reliability. Besides nothing has changed since Apollo, still lighting a match under a bomb. Astronauts are morons

I simply do not presume to tell Elon Musk how to run his business. What did you say your degrees are in, again?

OK genius, tell me now, does having the boosters land themselves add, subtract or have no effect on thrust?

Next question, do the thousands more parts needed on a toy trick lander add, subtract or have no effect on potential sources of catastrophic failure?

So kid you may not know the answers here, but I do and always did.

he he he

 

[White 6]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More

A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's sp

www.space.com

LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.

That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.

There is no private spaceflight.......................

Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think

Wake up

Yeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.

The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not know

• Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
  
  

  Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?

  Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.

  cleantechnica.com
  Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
• End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
  
  

  End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero

  It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.

  mashable.com
  Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
  • Author: Sasha Lekach
• Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
  
  https://www.reuters.com/article/us-tesla-results
  ...
  Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...
• Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
  
  

  Stocks

  Stocks

  realmoney.thestreet.com
  ...
  Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...

If you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.

Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space x

Tesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.

You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.

Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that money

Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.

Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.

Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance

Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.

It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.

It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.

I'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.

The USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothing

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.

SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com

SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.

www.upi.com

Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?

Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded

Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.

Again little one, when you ass thousands more parts the possibility for failure of those parts goes up. The weight of these parts also reduces thrust. The boosters are irrelevant after separation, and unless you are retarded you will know that thousands of less parts is cheaper to rebuild.

LOL as if we can't build our own boosters.

You will babble until everyone dies because of a more complicated than need be booster failure.

Less parts more reliability. Besides nothing has changed since Apollo, still lighting a match under a bomb. Astronauts are morons

I simply do not presume to tell Elon Musk how to run his business. What did you say your degrees are in, again?

OK genius, tell me now, does having the boosters land themselves add, subtract or have no effect on thrust?

Next question, do the thousands more parts needed on a toy trick lander add, subtract or have no effect on potential sources of catastrophic failure?

So kid you may not know the answers here, but I do and always did.

he he he

Argue with Musk or maybe you can launch a proxy fight and take the company away from him, sonny.

SpaceX’s bread and butter has always been (and will continue to be) the reusable nature of its rocket boosters. Still, SpaceX boss Elon Musk has stated that the fairings cost several million dollars on their own, so recovering and reusing them is a significant additional cost savings.

SpaceX is about to reuse a rocket component it's never reused before

SpaceX is already well ahead of its competition when it comes to reusable rocket technology. The company has proven many times that its hardware can …

bgr.com

 

[edthecynic]

Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world

In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…

www.washingtonexaminer.com

Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.

Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.

Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA

Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!

www.space.com

No one remembers because it never happened. But we do remember REAGAN'S NASA Muslim outreach which actually DID happen!!!!!

No, it didn't.

LIAR!
From a Right-wing source no less!
see the Muslim in his Muslin garb for the NASA photo!!!!!

Reagan/Bush Used NASA for Muslim Outreach Before Obama

www.debbieschlussel.com

“Payload Specialist” Prince Sultan: Reagan/Bush Beat Obama to the Muslim NASA Outreach Punch

In fact, the Obama administration is not the first to waste tax-funded NASA resources and space program on Muslims. Ronald Reagan and his VP, George H. W. Bush, were. But they just wouldn’t say so publicly.

Hiring an astronaut is "Muslim outreach"? Yeah, not really.

How many Muslims did Obama's NASA put in orbit? None.

He wasn't an astronaut, so yes it WAS Muslim outreach.
From my posted link by a well known Right-winger:
"There were exhibits all over the Cap Center party honoring Prince Sultan’s space trip. And, at the time, everyone in the U.S. space program knew what a joke it was, what an obvious sop to the Saudis, given that the Prince didn’t have an iota of the years of training and skill it takes to become an American astronaut. He had the title of “payload specialist,” but the only payload for which he was actually skilled was “pay the lady.” Only months earlier, the Prince was the acting Saudi Information Minister and had zero space knowledge."

Whoopty shit. Obama didn't even make a token effort to get anyone into space. He cancelled the STS.

Putting people and equipment into space is a space agency's job...not sucking up to the Muslim world.

Obama was a lousy President. I don't care if you worship his stuttering incompetence. Your anger is absolutely meaningless.

Still trying to change the subject.