The GUILTY AVERAGE ARAB "Palestinian" since 1941 (polls)

[Shusha]

Just a reminder that private land ownership is unrelated legally to sovereignty and statehood. Just because a whole bunch of Canadians own property in Florida, doesn't make Florida part of Canada.

 

[Kondor3]

Hamas an Hebollah are the indigenous natives and land owners.

Phukk 'em... vaee victis.

 

[Kondor3]

First of all, Islam is only a very slight reformation of Judaism, and Moslems do "keep to themselves" if allowed to.

Wrong.

Islam is the last of the very large scale Warrior Religions...

A Johnny-come-lately rip-off and bastardization of Judaism and Christianity, invented by a merchant-charlatan...

Peanut-Butter-and-Jelly-be-Upon-him...

Muslims can keep to themselves all they like... within their own domains... or behave themselves better outside those domains...

 

[Soupnazi630]

Lies.
First of all, WWI happened because Russia assassinated Archduke Ferdinand and his wife, and France invaded southern Germany.
Chaim Weizmann and David ben Gurion caused Germany to have to surrender even though never beaten on the ground, because of the Zimmerman letter and the formula for synthetic acetone for the naval explosive cordite they gave to England, in exchange for the Balfour Declaration.

There is not a single Jew who has or could contest the fact of the Rabbinical Diaspora Decree of 160 AD.

If the King David Hotel bombing was "retaliatory", then what did the British do to the Zionists that required retaliation?
The British allowed the Zionists to immigrate, so they should have been grateful to the British.

WRONG

You are a liar who loses that argument EVERYTIME

Russia did not assassinate ferdinand you retarded CHILD

Germany surrendered because they were beaten. There as no action by any jew any where which caused their defeat or surrender you uneducated ****

Stop asking shit I answered already you uneducated turd

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Show me an example of Arab Moslems attacking anyone when not in defense?
You can't, because it never happened.
The attacks are mostly by the western colonial imperialist, like the Crusades.
But later there were Asian attackers like the Mongols, Moghuls, Turks, Moor, Cossacks, etc., who are not Arab or really Moslem.

You can't be both Zionist and Jewish.
Zionism is evil and against the Diaspora Decree.

How could "peacekeepers encourage terrorists" when the only known examples of terrorism is by the Zionists?
It is the Zionists who not only blew up the King David Hotel, but massacred hundreds of villages like Deir Yassin.

I am not wrong YOU are

There are endless examples

Iraq invaded kuwaIT AND WAS NOT DEFENSIVE
I can and just did you mother ******

The crusades were defensive and a response to islamic aggression
The only know examples of terrorism are from islamics

it is islamics who provked the king david hotel attacks by slaughtering innocent jews

 

[Stryder50]

The OP, Post #1, should have been broken out into at least 20 posts.
Would make it much easier to read and digest.

 

[Rigby5]

Just a reminder that private land ownership is unrelated legally to sovereignty and statehood. Just because a whole bunch of Canadians own property in Florida, doesn't make Florida part of Canada.

But the Zionists in Israel do not legally own any property.
They stole it by arresting or murdering the Palestinian legal owners.

 

[Rigby5]

Wrong.

Islam is the last of the very large scale Warrior Religions...

A Johnny-come-lately rip-off and bastardization of Judaism and Christianity, invented by a merchant-charlatan...

Peanut-Butter-and-Jelly-be-Upon-him...

Muslims can keep to themselves all they like... within their own domains... or behave themselves better outside those domains...

Wrong.
If you read the Old Testament, women had no rights.
They could not own property, inherit, testify, divorce, etc.
About all Mohammed did was to change that to improve the rights of women.
Mohammed did that to please the wealthy widow who married him.

Islam prohibits war and violence except in defense.
During Mohammed's life, there were not invasions of anyone except defensively against the evil Roman Byzantine invaders.

 

[Rigby5]

WRONG

You are a liar who loses that argument EVERYTIME

Russia did not assassinate ferdinand you retarded CHILD

Germany surrendered because they were beaten. There as no action by any jew any where which caused their defeat or surrender you uneducated ****

Stop asking shit I answered already you uneducated turd

Wrong.
Russia got the Black Hand in Serbia to train and arm Princip.

Germany was not "beaten".
They still occupied most of France at the end of the war.
They surrendered due to mass starvation because the Allies illegally cut off their food.

The US would not have entered the war except for the Zimmerman Letter, which was stolen from Berlin by Jews who traded it for the Balfour Declaration on Palestine.

 

[Rigby5]

I am not wrong YOU are

There are endless examples

Iraq invaded kuwaIT AND WAS NOT DEFENSIVE
I can and just did you mother ******

The crusades were defensive and a response to islamic aggression
The only know examples of terrorism are from islamics

it is islamics who provked the king david hotel attacks by slaughtering innocent jews

Wrong.

Saddam invading Kuwait was defensive.
First of all, Kuwait was the coast of Iraq for thousands of years, and only taken from Iraq by the British around 1890.
Second is that Kuwait was ruled by a Bedouin dictator who was abusing the Iraqi natives.
Third is that Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq with slant wells.
Kuwait was also bankrupting Iraq by selling oil below treaty price.

The Crusades were not at all defensive, and Christians and Jews were harmed more by the Crusaders than the Moslems.

Menachem Begin practically invented terrorism when he blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel.
It could not have been "in retaliation" because clearly the British were not harming Jews, and if the Arabs hostile to Jews, then the Jews would not even have gone there.
So clearly it is all lies by the Zionists who must have deliberately planned it all in order to steal Palestine from the very beginning.

 

[Rigby5]

The OP, Post #1, should have been broken out into at least 20 posts.
Would make it much easier to read and digest.

Which shows that it really was just a cut'n'paste of professional propaganda, that likely should have gotten the whole thread canned.

 

[Shusha]

But the Zionists in Israel do not legally own any property.
They stole it by arresting or murdering the Palestinian legal owners.

Legal ownership and transfer of real property is irrelevant to the concept of sovereignty and statehood. Transfer of real property does not legally create an effect over sovereignty or statehood. Its an argument that demonstrates a lack of understanding of law.

 

[Grau]

The OP, Post #1, should have been broken out into at least 20 posts.
Would make it much easier to read and digest.

Why bother when you can find the same bigoted rubbish in the most recent Hasbara Handbook.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.
Russia got the Black Hand in Serbia to train and arm Princip.

Germany was not "beaten".
They still occupied most of France at the end of the war.
They surrendered due to mass starvation because the Allies illegally cut off their food.

The US would not have entered the war except for the Zimmerman Letter, which was stolen from Berlin by Jews who traded it for the Balfour Declaration on Palestine.

Wrong

Princip acted alone

Germany was defeated They were routed and in full retreat from the Americans

They surrendered due to being defeated on the battlefield


The Zimmerman letter had NOTHING whatsoever to do with America entering the war

You are completely wrong.

 

[Soupnazi630]

Wrong.

Saddam invading Kuwait was defensive.
First of all, Kuwait was the coast of Iraq for thousands of years, and only taken from Iraq by the British around 1890.
Second is that Kuwait was ruled by a Bedouin dictator who was abusing the Iraqi natives.
Third is that Kuwait was stealing oil from Iraq with slant wells.
Kuwait was also bankrupting Iraq by selling oil below treaty price.

The Crusades were not at all defensive, and Christians and Jews were harmed more by the Crusaders than the Moslems.

Menachem Begin practically invented terrorism when he blew up the British peacekeepers in the King David Hotel.
It could not have been "in retaliation" because clearly the British were not harming Jews, and if the Arabs hostile to Jews, then the Jews would not even have gone there.
So clearly it is all lies by the Zionists who must have deliberately planned it all in order to steal Palestine from the very beginning.

WRONG

Saddam's invasion of iraq was unprovoked and aggressive. Geographical positioning is irrelevant.

Kuwait stole nothing and was it's own soveriegn independant state. There was no treaty price

the crusades were defensive and the muslims killed and enslaved more christians not the crusaders

Terrrorism against jews in Palestine was raging long before the king david hotel
\
Those are all facts so clearly you are a liar

 

[Kondor3]

Wrong. If you read the Old Testament, women had no rights. They could not own property, inherit, testify, divorce, etc.
About all Mohammed did was to change that to improve the rights of women.

That was then. This is now. Mo's improvements of the 600s (A.D.) had a very low bar to jump over.

Western Women have blown past Mo's old miserly provisions long ago and make him-and-his look very backwards.

Mohammed did that to please the wealthy widow who married him.

Yes. It wasn't the Will or God or the Words of God. It was Mo tweaking his made-up $hit to please his Cougar-Mama.

Islam prohibits war and violence except in defense.

Tell that to the ghosts of the Jews of Medina. Or the ghosts of the dead of the Middle East and the Sassanid Empire and the Byzantine Empire and the Vandals and the Iberians (Spanish). Or a thousand other aggressions, including September 11, 2001.

The trouble with that is that it's not "real"... and the "defense" concept can be twisted 180-degrees to make an Aggression LOOK like Defense from a theological or philosophical perspective... that particular counterpoint is embarrassingly weak and useless.

During Mohammed's life, there were not invasions of anyone..

Invasions... no... savage wars of conquest and slaughter within the Arabian peninsula... yes.

except defensively against the evil Roman Byzantine invaders.

Nope...

Muhammed invaded...

The Empire was in the process of reoccupying territory after settling-up with the Sassanids...

Link to Wiki re: the Battle of Mu'tah

------

Islam has long-since degenerated into a backwards-looking cult which is incapable of true reform or modernization.

 

[Hector12]

But the Zionists in Israel do not legally own any property.
They stole it by arresting or murdering the Palestinian legal owners.

The early Zionists bought land from Turkish land owners, who evicted the landless Palestinians who had lived there. The Jews did not initiate the use of violence. When they were attacked, they fought back.

 

[FDR_Reagan]

We are in Aug 2025, and Arab Palestinian pro Oct 7 atrocities is still high.

 

[Sayaras]

dahlia kurtz ✡︎ דליה קורץ @DahliaKurtz
"WE WILL FUСKING КILL YOU."

One week after a Jewish father was beaten in front of his children, a keffiyeh threatens the lives of Jewish people — in a family neighbourhood — in Montreal.

Remember. This isn't Jew-hate. It's climate change. And it wasn't even that hot today!
Aug 16, 2025

 

[Shusha]

dahlia kurtz ✡︎ דליה קורץ @DahliaKurtz
"WE WILL FUСKING КILL YOU."

One week after a Jewish father was beaten in front of his children, a keffiyeh threatens the lives of Jewish people — in a family neighbourhood — in Montreal.

Remember. This isn't Jew-hate. It's climate change. And it wasn't even that hot today!
Aug 16, 2025

I’m so embarrassed that this is happening in my country.