esalla
Platinum Member
- Banned
- #61
So you have no clue.............................Argue with Musk or maybe you can launch a proxy fight and take the company away from him, sonny.OK genius, tell me now, does having the boosters land themselves add, subtract or have no effect on thrust?I simply do not presume to tell Elon Musk how to run his business. What did you say your degrees are in, again?Again little one, when you ass thousands more parts the possibility for failure of those parts goes up. The weight of these parts also reduces thrust. The boosters are irrelevant after separation, and unless you are retarded you will know that thousands of less parts is cheaper to rebuild.Sorry dude, but they have determined it is cheaper to re-use. Keep your Russian boosters, Yuri. We'll buy American or at least rent.Wow a totally useless record. Are they going to do this until everyone dies on the way up again?SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launchThe USA has no boosters period, we were buying Russian ones. Again there is no reason to soft land as the work is 100 percent achieved in the burn stage, after separation the booster has no value to the mission so the soft landing is a wet fart worth nothingI'm curious about the basis for your claim, since the US has no liquid-fueled boosters that soft-land in the ocean.It does not decrease turnaround time, unless there are not enough parts, it's a parlor trick that achieves absolutely nothing in performance, while adding weight that actually decreases performance.Really? Dry-landing means far less turnaround time.Why is tesla wasting money landing boosters upright that need to be 100 percent rebuilt anyway meaning there is no advantage to letting them fall into the ocean.Yeah, in case you didn't notice, Tesla's vehicle and space launch operations are separate business lines.Tesla is getting government subsidies for every tesla they produce and tesla is providing nothing for that moneyTesla's being paid for the service it provides -- lifting mass to orbit.Again without Tesla subsidies there is no space xIf you're asking me to defend subsidies given for expensive toys, you're going to be disappointed.The only reason that Tesla exist is the government subsidies, so it seems that you are the only one who does not knowYeah, I don't believe anyone thinks that. Meanwhile, we no longer have to pay another nation for rides into space.There is no private spaceflight.......................LOL! Private spaceflight really took off because Obama gutted our manned space program.Sorry. Here is a more accurate view from space.com. You Obama haters slay me. Half of you being "Flat Earthers" anyway.
Obama’s new mission for NASA: Reach out to Muslim world
In a far-reaching restatement of goals for the nation’s space agency, NASA administrator Charles Bolden says President Obama has ordered him to pursue three new objectives: to “re-inspire children” to study science and math, to “expand our international relationships,” and to “reach out to the…www.washingtonexaminer.com
Or course then those same Muslims started reaching out to US and murdered many who were just trying to live their lives in peace.
Today i got to watch the Falcon rocket soar up into space from northern Florida. You can bet the progs and their Green New Deal will put NASA back in mothballs.
Watch live today: SpaceX launching Sentinel-6 ocean-mapping satellite for NASA, ESA
Liftoff is set for 12:17 p.m. EST (1717 GMT)!www.space.com
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More
President Obama's Space Legacy: Mars, Private Spaceflight and More
A lot has changed in the fields of spaceflight and space exploration since President Barack Obama came to power eight years ago. Here's Space.com's admittedly premature look at the 44th president's space legacy.www.space.com
That's one way of pathetically giving him credit, I suppose.
Tesla gets ridiculous government subsidies that you pay for, so Space X is government funded. This way the government will not be funding the missions, or so the masses of dopes think
Wake up
- Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
Aug 03, 2020 · Tesla’s total subsidy value according to the data is $2,441,582,590 ($2.44 billion), across 109 “awards” — 82 federal grants and tax credits as well as 27 state and local awards. The idea of a...
Just How Much Does Tesla Get In Subsidies Anyways?
Did Elon Musk really steal money from the American tax payer while telling Americans he doesn't think they deserve a bailout? Nah. Let's dive into this.cleantechnica.com
- End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
Dec 26, 2019 · Tesla is at the tail end of a government incentive program for all EVs sold to receive a $7,500 subsidy. For Tesla buyers now in December 2019, the subsidyis …
End of an era: 2020 brings Tesla's federal tax credit to zero
It's the last few days to get any federal tax credit for buying a Tesla.mashable.com
- Factbox: Electric vehicle subsidies under pressure in some ...
...
Tesla’s China-built Model 3 cars will still receive subsidies as part of the government’s NEV program, the company said in December. Sales of electric and hybrid vehicles in 2019 dropped for the...- Tesla's (TSLA) Main Product Isn't Cars, It's Subsidies ...
...
Nov 05, 2018 · As you can see in the table above, Tesla benefited from $713 million in U.S. subsidies in the third quarter, not counting anything from its considerable international sales. Of those subsidies,...
You can call it a subsidy but you'll have to create a new definition of the word.
Looks cool right? With massive expenditure that yields no increased performance
It works. And it works pretty good. And we don't have to buy airfare to Baikonur. Not being dependent on another nation for access to space is a good thing. No, really.
ORLANDO, Fla., Aug. 18 (UPI) -- SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida Tuesday morning, setting a record for the launch industry.
SpaceX also recovered the booster successfully by landing it on a barge in the Atlantic Ocean -- the sixth recovery of that booster. The Starlink satellites deployed into orbit about 46 minutes after launch.
SpaceX sets rocket booster reuse record in satellite launch - UPI.com
SpaceX reused the same first-stage Falcon 9 rocket booster for the sixth time in a launch from Florida on Tuesday morning, notching a record for the launch industry.www.upi.com
Again kid the used boosters that land in the sea can be reused too and both need a 100 percent rebuild and I will guarantee you that the old boosters are simpler and as such have thousands less parts that can fail. Landing these things upright is so stupid that it is retarded
LOL as if we can't build our own boosters.
You will babble until everyone dies because of a more complicated than need be booster failure.
Less parts more reliability. Besides nothing has changed since Apollo, still lighting a match under a bomb. Astronauts are morons
Next question, do the thousands more parts needed on a toy trick lander add, subtract or have no effect on potential sources of catastrophic failure?
So kid you may not know the answers here, but I do and always did.
he he he
View attachment 417757
SpaceX’s bread and butter has always been (and will continue to be) the reusable nature of its rocket boosters. Still, SpaceX boss Elon Musk has stated that the fairings cost several million dollars on their own, so recovering and reusing them is a significant additional cost savings.
SpaceX is about to reuse a rocket component it's never reused before
SpaceX is already well ahead of its competition when it comes to reusable rocket technology. The company has proven many times that its hardware can …bgr.com
OK genius, tell me now, does having the boosters land themselves add, subtract or have no effect on thrust?
Next question, do the thousands more parts needed on a toy trick lander add, subtract or have no effect on potential sources of catastrophic failure?
So kid you may not know the answers here, but I do and always did.
he he he
