Another School Board Tries to Arrest Dissenting Parents

People who break the law should be arrested...right?

They most certainly were, in Nazi Germany. Especially the Jews.
You are officially reminded that in America in the 1800's, it was "Against the LAW" for a black man to have relations with a white woman.

Nice to know you approve of their incarceration for the offense.

Your lust to follow the "law" at any cost exposes your ignorance and lack of dimensional thought.
Even if it is actually a disguised ruse.
 
Last edited:
They most certainly were, in Nazi Germany. Especially the Jews.
You are officially reminded that in America in the 1800's, it was "Against the LAW" for a black man to have relations with a white woman.

Nice to know you approve of their incarceration for the offense.

Your lust to follow the "law" at any cost exposes your ignorance and lack of dimensional thought.
Even if it is actually a disguised ruse.

Eventually every disenchanted right winger compares whatever happens to Nazi Germany.... tale as old as time.
 
If you are unable to follow the rules and becomes disruptive in a meeting, you will be removed.

Thats always been the way this works. Why do you guys think the rules are different just for you?
You tell us. Why do BLM and Antifa types think the rules are different for them and they should not be removed from an area because they are disrupting other peoples' lives? Why do they think it's their prerogative to burn down businesses, then assault someone who puts out the fire? You go hard core law and order on parents speaking out about things that directly impact their kids, then go all squishy on rioters causing actual damage.
 
Disrupting and name calling are not the way to "demand" answers.
Blocking traffic, burning cars and buildings, and assaulting anyone who gets in the way are not the way to "demand" police reform either. Yet we're supposed to nod sagely and "understand" their "frustration".
 
You tell us. Why do BLM and Antifa types think the rules are different for them and they should not be removed from an area because they are disrupting other peoples' lives? Why do they think it's their prerogative to burn down businesses, then assault someone who puts out the fire? You go hard core law and order on parents speaking out about things that directly impact their kids, then go all squishy on rioters causing actual damage.
I have no problem with rioters who burned down buildings and assaulted people being investigated and arrested.

Many have but the right wing tends to ignore this and parrot the lie that none have been prosecuted.

No one is going "hard core" on parents especially not for "speaking out". This is another lie.
 
Blocking traffic, burning cars and buildings, and assaulting anyone who gets in the way are not the way to "demand" police reform either. Yet we're supposed to nod sagely and "understand" their "frustration".

Well, the 1/6 insurrectionists were rioting because a big orange blob/cult leader said he was wronged.

BLM rioters rioted over real world infractions by the very authorities that are supposed protect and serve.

Neither was remotely correct in resorting to violence and vandalism. The big difference is that the BLM guys had a real world grievance...you guys had nothing.
 
This is what the leftoids have and are creating. They loathe the First Amendment when anyone says anything they do not like, when anyone shows them for what they are.

It is Maoism at work.



The most recent installment in the ongoing saga of school administrators antagonizing parents comes from Chris Rufo’s latest article for City Journal, outlining the shocking story of local authorities in Round Rock, Texas, coming after two fathers for their vocal critiques of the school board:





These stories are no longer isolated incidents. As Rufo points out, “In Loudoun County, Virginia, for example, where parents have protested against critical race theory and a sexual assault cover-up, the superintendent asked the county sheriff to deploy a SWAT team, riot control unit, and undercover agents to monitor parents at school board meetings.” (The sheriff thankfully refused.) And “even the FBI, under the direction of Attorney General Merrick Garland, has mobilized to monitor parents at school board meetings and, if necessary, prosecute them under domestic terrorism laws. The National School Boards Association, which had requested the federal intervention in a letter to the Justice Department, was later forced to apologize after state chapters strenuously objected to the tone and content of that letter. Yet the Biden administration has moved forward with the effort, creating a task force of federal agents and attorneys to coordinate against parent protesters.”

Progressive bureaucrats nationwide are attempting to force parents into submission. As Story tells Rufo, “This isn’t just about Dustin [Clark] and me. It is about everyone. If they can come for us and get away with it, school boards nationwide will be emboldened to come for you.” It’s up to conservatives to work to stop it.

...


That's too bad. I lived in Round Rock for a few years back in the early 2000's. It hasn't taken long for the wokeness to reach the schools there.
 
It’s been the liberal way to demand answers since the sixties. If it’s acceptable for you, why isn’t it acceptable for us?

You've been answered...

About 60 times in court...I've lost count of how many times by election boards...

Now that the votes have been counted, and recounted, its time for the votes to count.

LOL
 
Well, the 1/6 insurrectionists were rioting because a big orange blob/cult leader said he was wronged.

BLM rioters rioted over real world infractions by the very authorities that are supposed protect and serve.

Neither was remotely correct in resorting to violence and vandalism. The big difference is that the BLM guys had a real world grievance...you guys had nothing.
There's no "my guys". I wasn't there, I wasn't rioting, and I called 1/6 what it was, a riot. Nor was I at any BLM riots, so your attempts to condemn me by association are fruitless.
 
This is what the leftoids have and are creating. They loathe the First Amendment when anyone says anything they do not like, when anyone shows them for what they are.

It is Maoism at work.


The most recent installment in the ongoing saga of school administrators antagonizing parents comes from Chris Rufo’s latest article for City Journal, outlining the shocking story of local authorities in Round Rock, Texas, coming after two fathers for their vocal critiques of the school board:
These stories are no longer isolated incidents. As Rufo points out, “In Loudoun County, Virginia, for example, where parents have protested against critical race theory and a sexual assault cover-up, the superintendent asked the county sheriff to deploy a SWAT team, riot control unit, and undercover agents to monitor parents at school board meetings.” (The sheriff thankfully refused.) And “even the FBI, under the direction of Attorney General Merrick Garland, has mobilized to monitor parents at school board meetings and, if necessary, prosecute them under domestic terrorism laws. The National School Boards Association, which had requested the federal intervention in a letter to the Justice Department, was later forced to apologize after state chapters strenuously objected to the tone and content of that letter. Yet the Biden administration has moved forward with the effort, creating a task force of federal agents and attorneys to coordinate against parent protesters.”
Progressive bureaucrats nationwide are attempting to force parents into submission. As Story tells Rufo, “This isn’t just about Dustin [Clark] and me. It is about everyone. If they can come for us and get away with it, school boards nationwide will be emboldened to come for you.” It’s up to conservatives to work to stop it.
...


Think about it, can you imagine what the reaction would have been from parent's back in the 80s, 70s, 60s, 50s or before, otherwise if they found out that their children were being introduced to thing's by their peers/adult's/teachers etc, that were found to be introducing them to pure ridiculousness in the current periods that were known to be or once were illegal things ????

Well they would have been locked up immediately over the stuff that we are hearing about or reading about today. But we know the skinny on it all.

Contributing to the delinquency of a minor and/or to be part of any willy nilly situation that endangers a child's mind, otherwise in the manor of brainwashing caused by illegal grooming and/or anything like that should be stopped....... It would have been met with some hellish reactions from parent's and from notable official's back in the day.

And better yet these notable official's would have backed the parent's instead of resisting them or fighting against them back in the day also. A lot has changed for the bad these days, and it's beginning to look grim and overwhelmingly for a lot of the parent/citizen's and their families.
 

Forum List

Back
Top