A Second American Civil War Is Nothing To Look Forward To

I'm sure that if anything happens politically that Trumpbots really don't like,there'll be a few nut cases that start shooting people.

A bunch of people will be murdered, but law enforcement will easily handle these assholes.
 
I'm sure that if anything happens politically that Trumpbots really don't like,there'll be a few nut cases that start shooting people.

A bunch of people will be murdered, but law enforcement will easily handle these assholes.
Some of these people most assuredly take all this very seriously. They will evolve into a full-fledged terror network unless we are very careful to never let them think we fear them.
 
A Second American Civil War Is Nothing To Look Forward To




https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...orward_to.html
13 Oct 19 ~ By William Marbury
Similarly, today, it is surprising to hear with what composure, and how glibly, members of the public, and even politicians, talk of a second American civil war. Some conservatives assume that they, having more arms and more training and practice in using them, would quickly prevail over the soy-boy Left.
Proficiency with firearms will be no match for nuclear bombs, which Democrat Eric Swalwell has already suggested deploying domestically.
Suppose that foreign powers intervene. In the situation of the world today, a dominant world power such as the United States cannot have a purely civil war, confined to a struggle between domestic forces. What happens in Washington has so much effect on the wider world that the wider world will try to influence what happens in Washington. Foreign interference in our elections would become foreign intervention in any armed conflict in the United States. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea — in fact, nearly all of America's enemies would likely support the Left and the Democrats. A second American civil war might devolve into a conflict between American patriots and the entire rest of the world, perhaps excluding Israel. In a country like Britain, disputes over which side to support could lead to their own civil war. The best strategy to avoid the danger of a second American civil war is the thorough defeat of the Democratic Party at the ballot box. It must be such a resounding defeat as to permanently discredit and destroy the Democratic Party. (The two-party system would be preserved by the splitting of the Republican party into its two wings.) Else, the Democratic Party is likely to destroy the United States.


Comment:
A civil war is the worst thing that can happen to this nation. There will be no winners and the patrimony of its forebears is squandered and destroyed in the process.
This is true, let's win peacefully next year by the re-election of Trump and hope a second civil war never happens in our great country. But as Trotsky once said, "you may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you," which means that you don't have to choose your enemy because it's enough for him to choose you. That is, war may force itself on us as has often happened in history, and we must be prepared to confront our country's enemies if we must.
Having studied the American, Spanish and English and Russian civil wars, our revolution was closer to a civil war than our civil war. It will NOT be the case this time if it happens.
A shooting civil war must be avoided and should be the absolute last resort. The idea that one can even properly identify an UN-UNIFORMED enemy absent obvious actions is dangerously naïve. Who are you going to shoot? This will NOT be the Blue and the Gray of the first civil war, nor Klingons vs Humans! Every neighborhood in every city and town likely consists of people with varying political beliefs that cannot be discerned by their physical appearance, clothing (except for masked Antifa) or skin color. Exactly WHO is your enemy? How do you determine whether they are sufficiently leftist enough to be considered the enemy? Where do you draw the line? Do you wait for them to shoot at you first? Maybe you need to shoot everyone just to be safe? But seriously, every state in the Union is populated with human beings on the Right, Left and down the Middle, each to varying degrees. You can’t seriously draw battle lines based on the dominant political party of a given city or state. Even the bluest state (like California) contains many conservatives who are on your side. By the way, the Swalwells' of the world advocating nuking conservative gun owners should be straitjacketed and confined to mental institutions.

The Coup Plotters and actors (Brennam, Comey, Clapper, et. al.) can't get away unpunished
 
Battleground: 7 in 10 say US ‘on the edge of civil war’



Battleground: 7 in 10 say US ‘on the edge of civil war’
October 23, 2019 ~ by Paul Bedard
Partisan political division and the resulting incivility has reached a low in America, with 67% believing that the nation is nearing civil war, according to a new national survey.
"The majority of Americans believe that we are two-thirds of the way to being on the edge of civil war. That to me is a very pessimistic place," said Mo Elleithee, the executive director of Georgetown University’s Institute of Politics and Public Service. And worse, he said in announcing the results of the institute’s Battleground Poll, the political division is likely to make the upcoming 2020 presidential race the nastiest in modern history.


Comment:
I am completely amazed that 67% actually get this. Recognizing it is a good sign... And I highly doubt they are blaming Trump... Just a gut feeling.
Once ballot harvesting became prevalent, I cannot consider any California elections legitimate. There are no reasons for any republican to contest any elections there, it's a Soviet system where all political reps are appointed behind closed doors and elections are a fiction.
If that poll does not convince you, see the poll showing a majority of millennials want to amend the first amendment to make hate speech a crime. Nothing short of institutionalized deprogramming can change their "minds."
I'm looking forward to the 2020 presidential campaign, when the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat nominee runs on being a "Unifier" because Trump has been "the most divisive president in history". (sarc) I've been watching the cultural vandalism of the PMS/DSA Left and the sickening passivity and collusion of the Right for too long. I've had it. The Left has made it abundantly, redundantly and graphicly clear that they not only refuse to coexist with us, but are actively interested in wiping us out -- metaphorically and literally. the progression of events tips more people into reality every day.
I am going to go against the grain here and assert that this is new awakening as to where we are actually 'is' Trump's fault. If he didn't piss in the punch bowl and expose them (or, more accurately, make them over-correct and expose themselves in a panic), the huge problems and massive damage the PMS/DSA Leftists did to American liberty and economics wouldn't be so public and it wouldn't have been embedded into so many people's minds.
Trump did nothing wrong, but I think that if he hadn't won, this survey would have had a 'very' different outcome. The circumstances would have been so different that I suspect the question wouldn't have even surfaced.
Trump's biggest value has been unmasking the corruption in our country, and by getting re-elected will provide four more years for those of us who know the score to prepare and organize. The PMS/DSA Democrat Leftists continue to seek to appease their crocodile (their rabid commie base) either without understanding the much bigger crocodile they are antagonizing in so doing or by thinking their paid liars within the biased media can convince it not to eat them. They can't and it will. There will be blood if they don't get a handle on themselves.
 
A Second American Civil War Is Nothing To Look Forward To




https://www.americanthinker.com/blog...orward_to.html
13 Oct 19 ~ By William Marbury
Similarly, today, it is surprising to hear with what composure, and how glibly, members of the public, and even politicians, talk of a second American civil war. Some conservatives assume that they, having more arms and more training and practice in using them, would quickly prevail over the soy-boy Left.
Proficiency with firearms will be no match for nuclear bombs, which Democrat Eric Swalwell has already suggested deploying domestically.
Suppose that foreign powers intervene. In the situation of the world today, a dominant world power such as the United States cannot have a purely civil war, confined to a struggle between domestic forces. What happens in Washington has so much effect on the wider world that the wider world will try to influence what happens in Washington. Foreign interference in our elections would become foreign intervention in any armed conflict in the United States. Russia, China, Iran, North Korea — in fact, nearly all of America's enemies would likely support the Left and the Democrats. A second American civil war might devolve into a conflict between American patriots and the entire rest of the world, perhaps excluding Israel. In a country like Britain, disputes over which side to support could lead to their own civil war. The best strategy to avoid the danger of a second American civil war is the thorough defeat of the Democratic Party at the ballot box. It must be such a resounding defeat as to permanently discredit and destroy the Democratic Party. (The two-party system would be preserved by the splitting of the Republican party into its two wings.) Else, the Democratic Party is likely to destroy the United States.


Comment:
A civil war is the worst thing that can happen to this nation. There will be no winners and the patrimony of its forebears is squandered and destroyed in the process.
This is true, let's win peacefully next year by the re-election of Trump and hope a second civil war never happens in our great country. But as Trotsky once said, "you may not be interested in war, but war is interested in you," which means that you don't have to choose your enemy because it's enough for him to choose you. That is, war may force itself on us as has often happened in history, and we must be prepared to confront our country's enemies if we must.
Having studied the American, Spanish and English and Russian civil wars, our revolution was closer to a civil war than our civil war. It will NOT be the case this time if it happens.
A shooting civil war must be avoided and should be the absolute last resort. The idea that one can even properly identify an UN-UNIFORMED enemy absent obvious actions is dangerously naïve. Who are you going to shoot? This will NOT be the Blue and the Gray of the first civil war, nor Klingons vs Humans! Every neighborhood in every city and town likely consists of people with varying political beliefs that cannot be discerned by their physical appearance, clothing (except for masked Antifa) or skin color. Exactly WHO is your enemy? How do you determine whether they are sufficiently leftist enough to be considered the enemy? Where do you draw the line? Do you wait for them to shoot at you first? Maybe you need to shoot everyone just to be safe? But seriously, every state in the Union is populated with human beings on the Right, Left and down the Middle, each to varying degrees. You can’t seriously draw battle lines based on the dominant political party of a given city or state. Even the bluest state (like California) contains many conservatives who are on your side. By the way, the Swalwells' of the world advocating nuking conservative gun owners should be straitjacketed and confined to mental institutions.


Nukes .......the nukes will probably get locked down to calm the rest of the planet while we slaughter the sheep

Ah the Trumpettes as your ever present fantasies of being able to kill Americans.
 
I wrote this eight months ago and most of the Leftists on this form pooh hoo'd me and emphatically denied my statements....
Well, it's here and IMHO, it will only get worse unless the silent majority of this country stand up to the anarchist terrorists.




 
LOL, this is not about an election. This is not about a political party. We had these protests and riots under Obama also. It doesn't matter which party is in charge. Changes in this country will happen or the violence will increase regardless of the party in charge.
 
LOL, this is not about an election. This is not about a political party. We had these protests and riots under Obama also. It doesn't matter which party is in charge. Changes in this country will happen or the violence will increase regardless of the party in charge.


Meanwhile it has been all about the president, it's all about the political power of the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Left. They control all the Blue cities and as we have seen the unrest that they themselves have fomented.
We are in a civil war once again. after 155 years and Democrats have decided to have another blood letting. While #BLM and #Antifa make claims of white racism, it is they who are the racists.
Contrary to your statement, it is All about the coming election in November....
 
Meanwhile it has been all about the president, it's all about the political power of the Progressive Marxist Socialist/DSA Democrat Left. They control all the Blue cities and as we have seen the unrest that they themselves have fomented.
We are in a civil war once again. after 155 years and Democrats have decided to have another blood letting. While #BLM and #Antifa make claims of white racism, it is they who are the racists.
Contrary to your statement, it is All about the coming election in November....

Trump is the president so yes, it's about Trump and his dismissive attitude. This is also about why Hillary lost last time also.

You can decide that parties make a difference when they really don't if you wish. The protests will continue no matter who wins as long as the issues are not addressed.
 
I wrote this eight months ago and most of the Leftists on this form pooh hoo'd me and emphatically denied my statements....
Well, it's here and IMHO, it will only get worse unless the silent majority of this country stand up to the anarchist terrorists.





Yea I've said the war is already underway from the media.
 
The thread title is, of course, an understatement of the first water.

The idea of an actual Civil War is too horrible to contemplate.

I blame the media for exaggerating the situation in this country.

The BLM movement would have collapsed if the media and politicians had ignored it. BLM had limited effectiveness in the Ferguson incident. Neither President Obama nor the media wanted to give it too much support, so it just petered out.


*****

What we need now is some rest from COVID-19 and the current Insurrection craziness (Seattle, statues being pulled down, politicians kneeling, etc.).

I plan to vote for President Trump.

But I feel that a President Biden will be better able to bring some peace to the country. I have no doubt whatsoever that the Dem bigwigs will get BLM and other activists to cool it for a while by buying them off with a promise of a lot of goodies.

The Trump years were certainly different. Now it's time to return to the usual Tweedle Dee and Tweedle Dum as exemplified by the traditional Democratic and Republican parties.
 
Last edited:
Ah the Trumpettes as your ever present fantasies of being able to kill Americans.
097000B7-086D-4202-841A-7DF65E59603C.jpeg
 
It doesn't have to happen, of course.

If it does, it will only be because we couldn't drop the egos and communicate like decent, intelligent grownups.

Well, maybe it WILL happen.
please. i've tried that several times with you and your definition of "intelligent grown ups" changes with your mood.

i do agree we can't communicate, but putting up instant walls and pretending you already know where the convo is going to go so you don't even bother isnt a step in that direction, now is it?
 
Seems most likely to me, that the powers that be are riling up the divided citizenry, in an attempt to get our two most passionate sides to take up arms against one another. Then Big Daddy government can swoop in, take the guns, and finally sieze all the power over our once free nation. Text book operation. Create the problem, then become the solution...
 
What we are experiencing is the Europeanization of American politics.

It's the Fascists vs. the leftists/socialists.

Americans used to have a baseline of beliefs that everyone agreed on.

Those previous generations would never have elected Trump.

I doubt there'll be a second civil war, but if there is, it won't be just the Chinese & Russians that intervene, it will be the Canadians, Mexicans and all of Western Europe. You can bet they won't be on Trump's side.
 
Wouldn't you assume that a blog that calls itself the American thinker would realize that there is zero possibility of the type of conflagration that tore the Country apart in 1860? There are a hundred reasons why a civil war can't happen including the fact that the states do not have the same power as they had back in the day. Other than the quirky agenda of California there is zero evidence of any state wanting to bear arms against the federal government. The situation the blog that ironically calls itself "the thinker" is of course garden variety anarchy
American Thinker is one of the most ironically named circle-jerking web sites out there.
 

Forum List

Back
Top