A.G. Merrick Garland May Face Impeachment over Abortion Protests at Justices’ Homes When GOP Takes House

Weatherman2020

Diamond Member
Mar 3, 2013
96,199
68,958
3,605
Right coast, classified
Save the time and money.
1657640220751.gif


U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland could face impeachment proceedings over the Department of Justice’s failure to enforce a federal statute that prevents picketing or parading outside of Supreme Court Justices’ homes, should Republicans take the majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections.

 
Does the GOP plan on carrying 2/3 the Senate? ... or do you not know how to remove an official from government? ...

Doesn't the State have the right to prosecute crimes in residential neighborhoods? ... or are you against State Rights now? ... I'm not seeing the connection using our nation's highest law enforcement powers for a local problem ...

The city I live in never issues protest permits for residential areas ... WAY TOO MANY GUNS .... it's a safety thing ... but we elect folks here locally who reflect our standards and opinions ... and the state police know they'll die before our state representative will be dragged back to SALEM TO FILL SOME GODDAM QUORUM ... double-double crossing bastards ...

Don't get me wrong, I like burning the American flag as much as any of you ... I'm just preoccupied burning the Oregon flag lately is all ...
 
Last edited:
Cool.


but why stop at the AG? Impeach all democrats and declare them illegal -- since we are engaging in right-wing fantasy time again


Hey how is that Durham investigation coming along? Hillary is going to jail any minute now I imagine...
 
Save the time and money.
View attachment 669332

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland could face impeachment proceedings over the Department of Justice’s failure to enforce a federal statute that prevents picketing or parading outside of Supreme Court Justices’ homes, should Republicans take the majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections.

Eric Holder gave guns to drug lords over the border, so why just pick on Merrick?

Nothing these lawless clowns do is ever held to account.
 
I like the idea but at the same time I wouldn't waste the time and money.

If republicans take over there is way too much damage control to deal with. I'd just make a huge round of firings and move on. We still have time for things to get even worse.
 
Save the time and money.
View attachment 669332

U.S. Attorney General Merrick Garland could face impeachment proceedings over the Department of Justice’s failure to enforce a federal statute that prevents picketing or parading outside of Supreme Court Justices’ homes, should Republicans take the majority in the House of Representatives in the midterm elections.

He should face impeachment for using his office to seek revenge against those who denied him a seat on the SCOTUS and showing why it was an excellent idea.
 
Does the GOP plan on carrying 2/3 the Senate? ... or do you not know how to remove an official from government? ...

Doesn't the State have the right to prosecute crimes in residential neighborhoods? ... or are you against State Rights now? ... I'm not seeing the connection using our nation's highest law enforcement powers for a local problem ...

The city I live in never issues protest permits for residential areas ... WAY TOO MANY GUNS .... it's a safety thing ... but we elect folks here locally who reflect our standards and opinions ... and the state police know they'll die before our state representative will be dragged back to SALEM TO FILL SOME GODDAM QUORUM ... double-double crossing bastards ...

Don't get me wrong, I like burning the American flag as much as any of you ... I'm just preoccupied burning the Oregon flag lately is all ...
The states can do nothing when the DOJ intercedes evert time to overrule the when the have no right to do so.
 
Eric Holder gave guns to drug lords over the border, so why just pick on Merrick?

Nothing these lawless clowns do is ever held to account.
The Neo-GOP is still pushing that lie. The Obama Administration didn't give Drug Lords shit.

Never trust the Neo-Bunch. Vote them out ladies. While you still can.
 
The Neo-GOP is still pushing that lie. The Obama Administration didn't give Drug Lords shit.

Never trust the Neo-Bunch. Vote them out ladies. While you still can.
Gotta link the Obama admin never gave guns to Mexican drug gangs?

I have one that says otherwise.

CNN

1657644429727.png

 
So Americans were incompetent at Iwo Jima? Yorktown? Bastogne?
The expansionist Fascist Japanese drew first blood. Germany declared war on us, and the Crown was guilty of a long series of violent abuses on the colonists. Not resorting to violence as a means to resolve a dispute means you should be able to meet violence with a violent enough response to stop it and to keep it from ever happening again.

But those were not "French Revolutions" where the Ruling Class and a lot of others lost their heads to the MegaMOB that you advocated for, were they?
 
Gotta link the Obama admin never gave guns to Mexican drug gangs?

I have one that says otherwise.

CNN

View attachment 669359

Your link confirms what I said. The firearms were purchased in AZ. But they are wrong too, according to the AZ laws, most all weapons purchases that were under surveillance by the AFT agents were purchased legally. Arizona refused to press charges against the alleged straw buyers.

The ATF agents had no orders from Holder's DOJ or the Obama White House authorizing their gun walking operation. They tried to pass the Buck up when that Border Agent, Brian Terry, was killed by some Drug Thugs.
 
The Neo-GOP is still pushing that lie. The Obama Administration didn't give Drug Lords shit.

Never trust the Neo-Bunch. Vote them out ladies. While you still can.
Or do listen to them instead of the sc
The Neo-GOP is still pushing that lie. The Obama Administration didn't give Drug Lords shit.

Never trust the Neo-Bunch. Vote them out ladies. While you still can.
Or do trust them since the socialist Nazis can never seem to tell the truth when it stands of chance of coming back to bite them.
 

Forum List

Back
Top