Va. And Md. Governors Demand Garland Ban Protests Outside Justices Homes

[struth]

Good grief you moron

You opened the goddamn thread.

You read the title before you opened it

Nobody is this stupid. Nobody. It's not possible. This has to be an act.

these aren’t protest they are threads to the court to get them to rule a certain way.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

these aren’t protest they are threads to the court to get them to rule a certain way.

I stand corrected.

It IS possible.

Wow.

 

[struth]

I stand corrected.

It IS possible.

Wow.

your support of this criminal conduct is aiding and abetting their insurrection

 

[Papageorgio]

The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states.

Youngkin actually tried to make Alito’s entire neighborhood sacred, or at least heavily restricted, ground. He asked local authorities to set up a perimeter around the area, limiting who could enter, and offered the state police to help. Fairfax County officials essentially told him to shove it.

People going into clinics for legal medical care are routinely harassed and threatened by anti-abortion protesters. Abortion providers live under constant threat. But a few candlelight vigils and peaceful protests directed at Supreme Court justices who hold power over the lives of everyone in this country and we’re supposed to be shocked and deeply concerned.

The Supreme Court has never been as insulated from politics as its defenders would have us believe, but now? The Supreme Court of Kavanaugh and Alito and Barrett? Of Clarence Thomas and his insurrectionist wife? A Supreme Court with five justices nominated by men who got into the White House after losing the popular vote? Spare me the pieties about the sanctity of the institution.

Virginia and Maryland governors demand that Garland ban protest outside justices' homes

The Republican governors of Maryland and Virginia are calling on Attorney General Merrick Garland to ban protests outside the homes of Supreme Court justices living in those states. Maryland’s Larry Hogan and Virginia’s Glenn Youngkin cited a 1950 law...

m.dailykos.com

Yep, conservatives can dish it out, but they can’t take it. Good for Fairfax county.

What a philosophy, you, violence and threats are okay because the other side does it. How stupid, that is the logic six year olds use. How about everyone stop it because we are adults living in a civilized society. You wanting a Justice killed?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

Wakes up this morning: "Nobody is talking about banning portents

Logs on, sees a thread abut governors banning protests (as indicated explicitly in the title), sees an article where the governors say they want to ban protests

The result of this new knowledge?

"Nobody is talking about banning protests."

Just...unexplainable.

Are these real people? Is this for real? Do we have a lot of people who are this unbelievably stupid in this country?

 

[WEATHER53]

nobody is talking about protest

It is not classified as “protest” to be outside judges residences telling them what you want to happen
It is classified as illegal

 

[struth]

It is not classified as “protest” to be outside judges residences telling them what you want to happen
It is classified as illegal

you have to remember these demafasict brownshirts refer to burning down buildings and firebombing churches as peaceful protest

 

[pknopp]

these aren’t protest they are threads to the court to get them to rule a certain way.

That's an excuse any old anti Constitutionalist would use to arrest people for protesting.

You sure hate America don't you?

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

It is not classified as “protest” to be outside judges residences telling them what you want to happen
It is classified as illegal

Oops, wrong again.

The law has been posted. Nowhere in the law does it say any protest near their homes is illegal.

Welcome to 10 pages and 100 years ago. Try to catch up.

 

[struth]

That's an excuse any old anti Constitutionalist would use to arrest people for protesting.

um the law against it isn’t unconstitutional.

not sure who gave you the idea that threatening judges to make a certain ruling was protected speech…they lied to you

 

[WEATHER53]

um the law against it isn’t unconstitutional.

not sure who gave you the idea that threatening judges to make a certain ruling was protected speech…they lied to you

Nobody told them. It’s their feeling and wish