Pro abortion protests at SC Justices homes are a violation of Federal Law.

[Nostra]

Where is Merrick Garland? Too busy chasing mom's at school board meetings? Saving the world from "climate change"?

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

 

[ColonelAngus]

The cult doesnt care.

They just want their way….whatever that is at the moment. It might change in 5 minutes.

 

[easyt65]

Can you find Garland in this picture, hiding instead of doing his job? Is he behind the tumbleweed or the electrical pole?

 

[TNHarley]

Pretty sure we all expected him to be a hack. Thats why he was picked

 

[Rambunctious]

I would clear that mob off my street in seconds....

 

[ColonelAngus]

Pretty sure we all expected him to be a hack. Thats why he was picked

Remember when the media was sucking on Obama’s nuts and characterized Garland as a “moderate”?

Lying bags of shit. Fake news. Democrat propaganda.

 

[Esdraelon]

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

This is a PERFECT opportunity to demonstrate their hypocrisy. If some pro-life group went to the homes of the dissenters and exactly mimicked the numbers, volume, and annoyance, provided against these five, just measure how quickly Federal cops would descend!

 

[ColonelAngus]

This is a PERFECT opportunity to demonstrate their hypocrisy. If some pro-life group went to the homes of the dissenters and exactly mimicked the numbers, volume, and annoyance, provided against these five, just measure how quickly Federal cops would descend!

Absolutely.

And the cult should remember this if they ever go after 2A.

Riots at the homes of the cult judges would be perfectly acceptable….right?

They can riot without consequence. We cannot.

 

[Missouri_Mike]

This is a PERFECT opportunity to demonstrate their hypocrisy. If some pro-life group went to the homes of the dissenters and exactly mimicked the numbers, volume, and annoyance, provided against these five, just measure how quickly Federal cops would descend!

Imagine the hollering about racism if Sotomayor had to leaver her house. It would be a huge freak out.

 

[bendog]

Where is Merrick Garland? Too busy chasing mom's at school board meetings? Saving the world from "climate change"?

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

Guess administration of justice didn't apply when the Trumptards tried to overturn an election.

 

[Nostra]

Guess administration of justice didn't apply when the Trumptards tried to overturn an election.

Um, there are hundreds of people from Jan 6 still in jail, Dumbass.

You really should educate yourself before posting.

 

[sealybobo]

Where is Merrick Garland? Too busy chasing mom's at school board meetings? Saving the world from "climate change"?

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

That depends on their interpretation of said federal law. Are you basing this on stare decisis? Past president? Well us liberals looked at the settled law and found it to be vague and unconstitutional, based on our understanding of what is and isn't constitutional.

Just like abortion wasn't murder yesterday but it is today.

 

[Nostra]

That depends on their interpretation of said federal law. Are you basing this on stare decisis? Past president? Well us liberals looked at the settled law and found it to be vague and unconstitutional, based on our understanding of what is and isn't constitutional.

Just like abortion wasn't murder yesterday but it is today.

No, there is no interpretation needed. The text of the statute is crystal clear.


Whoever, with the intent of interfering with, obstructing, or impeding the administration of justice, or with the intent of influencing any judge, juror, witness, or court officer, in the discharge of his duty, pickets or parades in or near a building housing a court of the United States, or in or near a building or residence occupied or used by such judge, juror, witness, or court officer, or with such intent uses any sound-truck or similar device or resorts to any other demonstration in or near any such building or residence, shall be fined under this title or imprisoned not more than one year, or both.
Nothing in this section shall interfere with or prevent the exercise by any court of the United States of its power to punish for contempt.
(Added Sept. 23, 1950, ch. 1024, title I, § 31(a), 64 Stat. 1018; amended Pub. L. 103–322, title XXXIII, § 330016(1)(K), Sept. 13, 1994, 108 Stat. 2147.)

 

[miketx]

Where is Merrick

Out looking for little girls and boys to turn into faggots.

 

[Staidhup]

To think he was considered a nominee to sit on the SC by Obama.
Federal laws don’t apply when they stand in the way of the liberal political narrative. Now if the tables were reversed…..these clowns would be locked up, declared terrorists, and we would be treated to a congressional investigation.
The hypocrisy never ends, yet stupid uneducated morons keep electing these fascists.

 

[Jets]

People should not be protesting at justices houses.

Period/End of story.

 

[task0778]

According to senior fellow at the National Review Institute and Fox News contributor Andy McCarthy, the Biden DOJ is being silent on the protests at SCOTUS justices' homes for the same reason as the White House: "They are elevating their political interest in portraying the draft Supreme Court opinion as extreme over their constitutional duty to execute the laws faithfully and protect both the Court and the justices."

Remember: the National School Board Association writes a letter to Biden, asking his administration to treat parent protests at school board meetings as possible acts of "domestic terrorism." 4 days later the FBI was dispatched, even though there was no assaults or riots. AND the relationship between parents and schools is a state and local issue, not a federal one — hypothetically, if a parent were to assault a teacher, it would be a state crime, not a federal one.

"By contrast, the protection of the Supreme Court as an institution, and of the justices’ security, are patently federal matters over which federal law-enforcement has clear jurisdiction. It is inexcusable that the Justice Department is so silent and passive now, when it was loud and active over a manufactured controversy as to which it had no jurisdiction," McCarthy told Fox News Digital.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

This is absolutely disgusting the way that the Biden Administration is using the DOJ as a political tool. As far as I'm concerned, we can't get rid of the fucking democrats soon enough.

 

[Indeependent]

Out looking for little girls and boys to turn into faggots.

Damn!
I was chewing on a cracker when I read your post!

 

[HandleTheTruth]

Where is Merrick Garland? Too busy chasing mom's at school board meetings? Saving the world from "climate change"?

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

It's ok it just a tour of the capital.

 

[dudmuck]

Where is Merrick Garland? Too busy chasing mom's at school board meetings? Saving the world from "climate change"?

People are threatening SC Justices and their families at their homes, in direct and blatant violation of Federal Law.

DOJ silent on abortion protests at justices' homes despite federal law prohibiting 'pickets' to influence case

Despite the language included in the federal statute, Attorney General Merrick Garland has not issued a public statement addressing the protests outside conservative justices' homes.

www.foxnews.com

yes, wonder where Garland is, since Mark Meadows has been in contempt of congress six months ago. Certainly is a partisan to just sit on that.

But about the protests, how does it compare to...

Protesters gather at Minnesota governor's mansion over lockdown, chant 'open up'

Protesters gathered outside of the Minnesota governor's mansion Friday rebelling against coronavirus stay-at-home orders and demanding an end the lockdown, chanting "open up."

www.foxnews.com

Groups protest outside Capitol, governor's mansion over state closures

ALBANY — Well over 100 protesters stood outside the state Capitol to decry the closure...

www.timesunion.com