georgephillip
Diamond Member
Let's put the New Clean Debate Zone to the ultimate test.
How did two planes collapse three steel-framed skyscrapers on 9/11/2001?
I suggest limiting our debate to World Trade Center 7, a 47-story building untouched by either aircraft on that fateful day. Specifically, I would like to start with the 2.25 seconds of free-fall acceleration displayed by WTC7 over about eight stories.
Let the civility begin (I hope)
"A major piece of evidence in the WTC 7 collapse is the fact that WTC 7 underwent free-fall acceleration for a period of at least 2.25 seconds.[3]
"A free-falling building means there is no supporting structure whatsoever below to slow the buildings fall.
"The NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) theory does not explain this astounding fact.
"However, if their theory is to believed, the 2.25 seconds of free fall must have resulted from near-simultaneous buckling and breaking of the 58 perimeter columns and most of the 25 core columns over eight stories."
A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse
How did two planes collapse three steel-framed skyscrapers on 9/11/2001?
I suggest limiting our debate to World Trade Center 7, a 47-story building untouched by either aircraft on that fateful day. Specifically, I would like to start with the 2.25 seconds of free-fall acceleration displayed by WTC7 over about eight stories.
Let the civility begin (I hope)
"A major piece of evidence in the WTC 7 collapse is the fact that WTC 7 underwent free-fall acceleration for a period of at least 2.25 seconds.[3]
"A free-falling building means there is no supporting structure whatsoever below to slow the buildings fall.
"The NIST (National Institute of Science and Technology) theory does not explain this astounding fact.
"However, if their theory is to believed, the 2.25 seconds of free fall must have resulted from near-simultaneous buckling and breaking of the 58 perimeter columns and most of the 25 core columns over eight stories."
A Scientific Theory of the WTC 7 Collapse