What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Da GUV LIED WE DIED! 9/11 Intentional Destruction PROVEN!

OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
166 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
168 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Your Op has been disproven and everyone knows it.

You are nothing but a copy cat regurgitating debunked crap and you have been owned
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
164 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!
Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Sorry but you are proven wrong and a liar.

Everyone knows many on ehre have disproven your op

Your entire claim has been debunked and is nothing more than a regurgitation of crap from others.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
164 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
The Op has been addressed ,shredded, debunked and disproven and everyone knows it.
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
164 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Your a proven liar of course.

The OP has been disproven massively.

You are simply rehashing what other have done before and been debunked like them
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
WOW! LOOK AT NAZI THE FELCHING BUTT HURT LYING TROLL!
164 posts not one flunky debunker addressed the OP!
2 DIGIT IQ LOSERS! GETTING GRAY WAITING HERE!
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Yet you still know your OP has been disproven and crushed

You are lying and repeating what has been debunked many times in the past
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!
SOUPNAZI IS A LYING FELCHING BUTT HURT ASSHELMET FUCKTARD TROLL!

178 posts not one flunky 2 DIGIT IQ LOSER debunker addressed the OP!
Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif



https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf


tE54mlb.jpeg




N7R3s00.jpeg



4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into



www.nist.gov



www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Of course everyone knows you are lying.

Your Op has been crushed and disproven many times over and is nothing more than a copy cut of other peoples crap long since debunked
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
NIST LIED! FEA+FORENSICS PROVES WTC7 WAS DEMOLISHED! LOOK!
SOUPNAZI IS A LYING FELCHING BUTT HURT ASSHELMET FUCKTARD TROLL!
178 posts not one flunky 2 DIGIT IQ LOSER debunker addressed the OP!


Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif




https://files.wtc7report.org/file/p...ollapse-of-World-Trade-Center-7-March2020.pdf



tE54mlb.jpeg






N7R3s00.jpeg




4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”

WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.

Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation
Questions and Answers about the NIST WTC 7 Investigation (09/17/2010, ARCHIVE, incorporated into




www.nist.gov




www.nist.gov


After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

We get it nazi, you are all butthurt, maybe its time to switch to a different lube?

Trolling and lying wont fix your sore asshole. Maybe this site will be able to help you and your buddies get sorely needed relief...... The gay sex guide to lube
Too bad for you.

You know and everyone knows your OP has been debunked and disproven long ago. You simply copied it from others and got owned
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.




After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition
It has in fact been disproven
 

my2¢

So it goes
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
May 14, 2010
Messages
11,703
Reaction score
3,085
Points
290
Location
State 48
If those pushing conspracy theories offered proof of what happened instead of pushing their thoughts on what didn't happen then I guess we'd have no conspiracy theories.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
3,232
Reaction score
1,455
Points
178

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
3,232
Reaction score
1,455
Points
178

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,256
Points
265
If you're going to be a snarky dweeb, at least have a point. I know all you truth deniers are a bunch of unhappy angry assholes but I believe you can do better.
Yes you are exaqctly that type of truth denier also known as a liar
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
4,813
Reaction score
1,986
Points
893
Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.




After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition
That's about the same amount who believe there is a god and Elvis is still alive. It's b.s..
 

g5000

Diamond Member
Joined
Nov 26, 2011
Messages
96,066
Reaction score
17,275
Points
2,180
Thats because you dont think anything through very well and get slapped across the kisser with there was no building debris at shanksville, and none to speak of at the pentagon that would interfere from collecting every ounce of plane.

I dont have to make fun of you, you make fun of yourselves, I only need point it out.

ok nazi you juvenile troll, your turn, post your usual pile of stoopid! :icon_lol:
:lol:

You think the Pentagon was hit by a missile? BWA-HA-HA-HA-HA!
 

Angelo

Diamond Member
Joined
Jan 5, 2019
Messages
31,917
Reaction score
16,012
Points
1,915
Location
_Arkansas~_The Natural State_
Do they?
Have you taken yoyr irrefutable evidence to the authorities?
No. You just love conspiracy theories.
Whenever the government calls something a conspiracy theory then I like investigating on my own .

Although in the case of 911 anyone with two eyes and a little bit of common sense knows all three towers wouldn't have fallen the way they did, without help.
 

Colin norris

Platinum Member
Joined
Apr 25, 2021
Messages
4,813
Reaction score
1,986
Points
893
Whenever the government calls something a conspiracy theory then I like investigating on my own .

Although in the case of 911 anyone with two eyes and a little bit of common sense knows all three towers wouldn't have fallen the way they did, without help.

Ok. Let's see you link to where the government called it a conspiracy theory.
Post it now it admit that is a lie.

Common sense is not that common amongst conspiracy theorists. Suddenly all of you are construction engineers and explosive experts.
Do you think rational human beings will accept that?
Why would the government want to kill 3500 people? Use your common sense to answer that.
Please. Stop your folly with reality. It's not a good look.
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$166.00
Goal
$350.00

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top