What's new
US Message Board - Political Discussion Forum

Register a free account today to become a member! Once signed in, you'll be able to participate on this site by adding your own topics and posts, as well as connect with other members through your own private inbox!

Da GUV LIED WE DIED! 9/11 Intentional Destruction PROVEN!

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.




After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition
 
Last edited:

toobfreak

Tungsten/Glass Member
Gold Supporting Member
Joined
Apr 29, 2017
Messages
41,720
Reaction score
27,524
Points
2,615
Location
On The Way Home To Earth
NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

It DID fall that way! Just that due to the Earth turning in the other direction, that straightened everything out and so it fell straight down! :smoke:

Engineering 101, Dude. :SMILEW~130:
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
Hmm....they never factored in the earths rotation, or the position of the moon for that matter! Too bad you gave it away, I hope the debunkers didnt notice that!

No wonder NIST refused to release any of its model data!!

 
Last edited:

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
19,705
Reaction score
9,718
Points
1,108
Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.




After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition

This is BS. Are you familiar with any of Minoru Yamasaki other buildings?
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
19,705
Reaction score
9,718
Points
1,108
It DID fall that way! Just that due to the Earth turning in the other direction, that straightened everything out and so it fell straight down! :smoke:

Engineering 101, Dude. :SMILEW~130:

The buildings weren't knocked OVER.. Their spine was cut. Gravity is predictable.
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
This is BS. Are you familiar with any of Minoru Yamasaki other buildings?
irellevant red herring, I presented fea, if you disagree with structural physics present your fea to refute it. Be sure to include ALL connection and structural data.
 

surada

Platinum Member
Joined
Jan 3, 2021
Messages
19,705
Reaction score
9,718
Points
1,108
irellevant red herring, I presented fea, if you disagree with structural physics present yours to refute it.

The floors were cantilevered off the central core and the exterior was an aluminum skin. They were willow reeds of buildings.. and that isn't anything like brick and mortar.

They didn't fall over.. They fell down in a cascading failure.
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
The floors were cantilevered off the central core and the exterior was an aluminum skin. They were willow reeds of buildings.. and that isn't anything like brick and mortar.

They didn't fall over.. They fell down in a cascading failure.
what building are you talking about? The OP refers to wtc7
 

hjmick

Platinum Member
Joined
Mar 28, 2007
Messages
23,035
Reaction score
7,824
Points
360
Location
Charleston, SC
Not this shit again...
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
Not this shit again...
Yes its that time of the year again for debunkers to be taken to school, debunkers need love too. Dont be truant!
 

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,255
Points
265
Yep now we know!

NIST took 7 years and made it all up, a fake report!

Using NIST's claim that column 79 buckled causing a progressive collapse, something truthers were smart enough to figure out was bs right from the begining, now we have the fea to prove it!

NIST claim, Failure of Columns 76 to 81, this is how the building would have fell if that were true!

Figure-4.16-Hypothetical-Failure-of-Columns-76-to-81--UAF-WTC-7-Draft-Report_part1_2.gif









tE54mlb.jpeg

N7R3s00.jpeg

4.7 Summary and Conclusion

In summary, several findings were made from the analyses above:

1.Columns 79, 80, and 81 did not fail at the lower floors of the building. Instead, they needed to have failed at the upper floors of the building all the way to the penthouse. Yet there were no documented fires above Floor 30.

Therefore, fire did not cause the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81nor the collapse of the east penthouse.

2.The hypothetical failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 —the three eastern most core columns —would not trigger a horizontal progression of core column failures. 110

Therefore, the hypotheses of NIST, Arup/Nordenson, and Weidlinger that the buckling of Column 79 would trigger a progressive collapse of the entire building are invalid, and the collapse of Columns 79, 80, and 81 high in the building was a separate and distinct event.

3.Even if we assume the failure of Columns 79, 80, and 81 could lead to the failure of the next row of core columns, the hypothetical failure of Columns 76 to 81 would overload the exterior columns around the southeast corner of the building, rather than overloading the next row of core columns to the west, which would result in the building tipping to the southeast and notina straight-down collapse.

4.The simultaneous failure of all core columns over 8 stories followed 1.3seconds later by the simultaneous failure of all exterior columns over 8 stories produces almost exactly the behavior observed in videos of the collapse.

The collapse could have started at various floors starting at Floor 16 and below and produced the same behavior.It is our conclusion that the collapse of WTC 7 was a global failure involving the near-simultaneous failure of all columns in the building and not a progressive collapse involving the sequential failure of columns throughout the building.Despite simulating a number of hypothetical scenarios, we were unable to identify any progressive sequence of failures that could have taken place on September 11, 2001, and caused a total collapse of the building, let alone the observed straight-down collapse with approximately 2.5 seconds of free fall and minimal differential movement of the exterior.

Last week, AE911Truth, along with researchers at the University of Alaska Fairbanks, released the draft report of a four-year computer modeling study of the tower’s collapse. “The report confirms what most Americans suspect when they see the collapse,” said Walter. “Building 7 did not come down from fires.”



WHAT DID NIST SAY:

Diagram 1-Typical WTC 7 floor showing locations of columns (numbered). The buckling of Column 79 was the initiating event that led to the collapse of WTC 7. The buckling resulted from fire-induced damage to floors around column 79, failure of the girder between Columns 79 and 44, and cascading floor failures.

1.75 to 4.0 seconds): gravitational acceleration (free fall)

Thermite is a combination of aluminum powder and a metal oxide that releases a tremendous amount of heat when ignited. It is typically used to weld railroad rails together by melting a small quantity of steel and pouring the melted steel into a form between the two rails.

To apply thermite to a large steel column, approximately 0.13 lb of thermite would be needed to heat and melt each pound of steel. For a steel column that weighs approximately 1,000 lbs. per foot, at least 100 lbs. of thermite would need to be placed around the column, ignited, and remain in contact with the vertical steel surface as the thermite reaction took place. This is for one column . presumably, more than one column would have been prepared with thermite, if this approach were to be used.




After viewing video footage of the controversial building collapse from four different angles, 52% of Americans who participated in the survey are either sure or suspect it was caused by a controlled demolition
Ydes we know you are a liar.

The NISt report has not been erefuted with evidence.

AE911 truth is a proven bunch of frauds.
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
Ydes we know you are a liar.

The NISt report has not been erefuted with evidence.

AE911 truth is a proven bunch of frauds.
awe still in pain from the last time you got your ass handed to you.

0708719d6fe2fb9063e66f3b24f5087c.jpg


Everyone on the board knows you are the village idiot and you got loose again.

Finite element analysis used in the revaluation is 20,000 light years beyond your comprehension, sorry, I know it hurts, Youll be ok. Just apply the buttcream twice daily, go to bed early and use your pacifier, you'll be fine in the morning.
 
Last edited:

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,255
Points
265
awe still in pain from the last time you got your ass handed to you.

0708719d6fe2fb9063e66f3b24f5087c.jpg
What an

Everyone on the board knows you are the village idiot and you got loose again.

Finite element analysis used in the revaluation is 20,000 light years beyond your comprehension, sorry, I know it hurts, Youll be ok. Just apply the buttcream twice daily, go to bed early and use your pacifier, you'll be fine in the morning.
What an ass clown.

Everyone knows the opposite boy and you are projecting.

I ciompletely crushed you and made you into a whore.

Onjce again bitch you have no evidence and are a proven liar
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
Engineering 101, Dude.
The study took over years to complete, incredible amount of work went into it. Except for the usual ankle biter name calling yipper trolls, its doubtful any real debunker will show up in here because this thread takes them to school.
 

Dadoalex

Gold Member
Joined
Jan 11, 2021
Messages
3,232
Reaction score
1,455
Points
178
The study took over years to complete, incredible amount of work went into it. Except for the usual ankle biter name calling yipper trolls, its doubtful any real debunker will show up in here because this thread takes them to school.
1627177936823.png


You go girl! Don't you dare let science and stupid facts get in YOUR way!

Damn.
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85

Soupnazi630

Gold Member
Joined
Dec 9, 2013
Messages
10,500
Reaction score
2,255
Points
265
The study took over years to complete, incredible amount of work went into it. Except for the usual ankle biter name calling yipper trolls, its doubtful any real debunker will show up in here because this thread takes them to school.
This thread is DOW and there was no study at all much less one taking years and work


Once again you are citing AE911 truth which is a fraudulent organization

FACT no evidence of controlled demo and no evidence disproves the NIST report
 
OP
KokomoJojo

KokomoJojo

VIP Member
Joined
Oct 2, 2013
Messages
2,179
Reaction score
182
Points
85
I cited hulsey from the university of arizona dumbass troll
 

USMB Server Goals

Total amount
$166.00
Goal
$350.00

New Topics

Most reactions - Past 7 days

Forum List

Top