what does the right want now?

[theHawk]

It is OK for the Chinese to fill the Hussein's coffers, then US companies should be able to donate to whomever they want.

You libs are all for giving government all the power in the world, but a private enterprise dare not get an ounce.

 

[freedombecki]

why dont you prove your claim first

He (Mad Scientist) just proved you didn't read your own white paper with which you were instructed to come here and smarm the USMB public, madam.

 

[freedombecki]

what the (sic)republican (sic)parety (sic)ois doing here is asking for the ability to murder our democracy. The Roberts court will no doubt give them that right. Say goodbye to freedom folks

O looky! Truthmatters dragged out her psychology of communications text and pulled out the part about crazy-maker communications chapter on projecting. (taking one's own vices and pretending them to be that of their adversary in order to escape notice of listener.)

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JPstEwwj93U"]Crazy Hyena Laugh (best on youtube) - YouTube[/ame]
​

I am really (sic)begining to wonder who these (sic)irght wing posters really are.

There is NO (sic)guarnetee that they are who they say they are.

Strange you would mention it. We have been wondering the same thing about you, dear.

 

[The Infidel]

so you cant read page two of the brief WRITTEN by the GOP?

For-profit corporations have discernible owners and
profit distributions which may be relied upon to attribute contributions to
individuals and prevent the use of corporations as conduits to circumvent
recognized contribution limits. Non-profit corporations, by definition, do not have
owners or profits to distribute, rendering attribution more difficult. While the
resulting state of affairs may appear illogical, it is far more rational and
constitutionally sound than the current regulatory regime

 

[Mr. Shaman]

It is OK for the Chinese to fill the Hussein's coffers, then US companies should be able to donate to whomever they want.

You libs are all for giving government all the power in the world, but a private enterprise dare not get an ounce.

Yeah......private enterprise has had a really tough time, lately......

[ame=http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fHGCZC6EQs]Iraq War Profiteers: Part 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]​

 

[The Infidel]

The government fails to show that circumvention is a sufficient threat to the
political system and fails to account for the role political actors play in protecting
against violations of campaign finance regulation. Even assuming anticircumvention is a sufficiently important governmental interest, the complete ban
both is over-inclusive to this aim and artificially disadvantages political party and
candidate committees. It is over-inclusive because it bans all corporate donations
without regard to the ability of corporate donors to attribute their donations to
individuals. It artificially disadvantages political party and candidate committees
by forcing them to rely on aggregating small-dollar donations from individuals
while allowing other political actors, such as independent-expenditure-only
political action committees, to receive unlimited corporate donations

 

[freedombecki]

It is OK for the Chinese to fill the Hussein's coffers, then US companies should be able to donate to whomever they want.

You libs are all for giving government all the power in the world, but a private enterprise dare not get an ounce.

Yeah......private enterprise has had a really tough time, lately......

[ame="http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=3fHGCZC6EQs"]Iraq War Profiteers: Part 1 of 2 - YouTube[/ame]​

In your you-tube, the announcer starts off by saying there is no electricity in Bagdad, and while he is saying that there is wide-spread looting, the camera briefly shows a man carrying an electric television set out of a room in the direction of the camera.

Who are they trying to kid here? Idiots who believe anything you say?

To every season, spin, spin, spin
There is a reason, spin, spin, spin....​

 

[Lovebears65]

I have been telling you people the Republicans want to hand this country ovedr to the corporations.

That is why they cheated to get Bush elected.

So they could appoint a RIGHT WING COURT!

this Roberts court will do their bidding at the drop of a hat.

Has anyone on the right been indicted for this?? Unlike the left who has been indicted for cheating to win elections in Troy NY..
Voter Fraud 'a Normal Political Tactic' In Upstate NY City | Fox News

 

[Truthmatters]

Summary of the Argument


In Citizens United V The Federal Elecction Commision, 130 S.Ct. 876,904 (2010), the Supreme Court stated "f the first Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congreess from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens for simply enguaging in political speech." Yet that is precisely what is happening in this case. The Defendants- Appellees face imprisonment under count 4 of the indictment simply for seeking to enguage in political speech through the Corporate form.


This is on page 2

http://images.politico.com/global/2012/01/rncamicus.pdf

 

[The Infidel]

Summary of the Argument


In Citizens United V The Federal Elecction Commision, 130 S.Ct. 876,904 (2010), tHE sUPREMEM cOURT STATED "f the first Amendment has anhy force, it prohibits Congreess from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens for simply enguaging in political speech." Yet that is preecisely what is happening in this case. The Defendants- Appellees face imnprisonment under count 4 of the indictment simply for seeking to enguage in political speech through the Corporate form.


This is on page 2

Keep reading..... I did

Whats "your" problem with this?

Give us "your" opinion.

 

[Truthmatters]

The republican party wants corporate donations made legal.

 

[Truthmatters]

this country will not survive it

 

[The Infidel]

The republican party wants corporate donations made legal.

And????


Its their (the owner of Corp.) money... if the board members and stock holders are OK with it.... who cares?

Full disclosure.... dont buy their product if ya dont like it.

Its called freedom.

 

[TakeAStepBack]

As with the democratic party. What's your point?

 

[Truthmatters]

dont buy their product?


what good will that do you when they already own the government?

 

[Mad Scientist]

why dont you prove your claim first

Um, this is your thread. You still haven't proven your claims made in it.

 

[Truthmatters]

How can you people on the right defend this?


This is not what the founders intended.

It was suposed to be about all people and not the kings and Queens

 

[Truthmatters]

Summary of the Argument


In Citizens United V The Federal Elecction Commision, 130 S.Ct. 876,904 (2010), the Supreme Court stated "f the first Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congreess from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens for simply enguaging in political speech." Yet that is precisely what is happening in this case. The Defendants- Appellees face imprisonment under count 4 of the indictment simply for seeking to enguage in political speech through the Corporate form.


This is on page 2

http://images.politico.com/global/2012/01/rncamicus.pdf

Its in their own words.

this was filed by the Republican party

 

[The Infidel]

How can you people on the right defend this?


This is not what the founders intended.

It was suposed to be about all people and not the kings and Queens

Tell that to General Electric CEO Jeffrey Immelt

This is a joke.... Im out!

 

[Truthmatters]

Any American who agrees that corporations whould have more rights than people hates the founders and the constitution