ALL 11 Alternate (Fake) Electors, Including GOP Chair Kelli Ward, Indicted In Arizona!

[j-mac]

No idea, and also not relevant.

Fake electors being a part of corrupt elections in the 19th century has no bearing on their legality today.

“Fake” is a false narrative, fake if you will…

 

[Curried Goats]

The whole thing is theater. There have been about 156 faithless electors in the history of the country. It happens. The DNC and their minions on the msm are just making hay out of it to deflect from their train wreck governance. They didn't think it was worth much of a mention when four electors in WA voted faithlessly for Colin Powell (3) and another fringe candidate (1) instead of Hillary Clinton in 2016.

4 Washington state electors decided not to vote for Hillary Clinton in 2016. They were fined $1,000, went to court and lost.

The four electors, three of whom voted for Colin Powell, argued that a state infringes on their free speech rights and interferes with a federal electoral process. A Superior Court judge and the state Supreme Court have disagreed.

www.seattletimes.com

4 Washington State Electors to Be Fined $1,000 for Vote

www.theepochtimes.com

Faithless electors are not fake electors. Those are actual certified electors that the legislature has lost faith in because they didn't uphold the oaths they took when they became the actual certified electors. Learn to read you illiterate Bingo.

 

[Concerned American]

These were the hypotheticals of Trump and his co-conspirators. Just because a bunch of fuckwits imagine they're going to repel down into a bank vault like Tom Cruise in Mission Impossible but the reality turns out their harness is a jock strap and instead of repelling they fall through the roof life Bingos that's not a crime because their dipshit plans were unlikely to succeed? Great logic there!

When you get done with the nonsense, you might want to learn the difference between "repel" and "rappel"

 

[Concerned American]

Faithless electors are not fake electors. Those are actual certified electors that the legislature has lost faith in because they didn't uphold the oaths they took when they became the actual certified electors. Learn to read you illiterate Bingo.

Are you repelling are rappeling? Illiterate Bingo.

 

[j-mac]

Sending uncertified electors to be counted in Congress is NOT questioning the election. It's fraud.

You have to prove it.

 

[Lastamender]

Yes. That's exactly correct. Read the indictment, you're embarrassing yourself.

That was Plan A.

It was the "theory" invented by the criminals, ya dummy. Get it through your head.

What theory? Let's hear how that happens.

 

[Curried Goats]

When you get done with the nonsense, you might want to learn the difference between "repel" and "rappel"

Does that change my point? Just because Trump's plans were stupid doesn't mean they weren't criminal.

 

[Curried Goats]

Are you repelling are rappeling? Illiterate Bingo.

I'm not embarrassed to admit I thought it was spelled differently. You know why? Because it's not that important. You're going to pretend it is because your argument just isn’t very good.

 

[Marener]

“Fake” is a false narrative, fake if you will…

They are not the true, real, or genuine electors.

Therefore they are fake.

 

[Lastamender]

View attachment 938097



They are not the true, real, or genuine electors.

Therefore they are fake.

One more time. If the election went back to the state legislature and it changed the results those electors would be legal. They need to be there when an election is challenged. The winners electors do the voting. The others do nothing. They are of no harm to anyone.

 

[j-mac]

View attachment 938097



They are not the true, real, or genuine electors.

Therefore they are fake.

Ok, show us the statues concerning so called “fake electors “

 

[Curried Goats]

One more time. If the election went back to the state legislature and it changed the results those electors would be legal. They need to be there when an election is challenged.

No they wouldn't. They don't become retroactively legal. They become legal after they are sworn in as the duly appointed electors for the State.

 

[Lastamender]

No they wouldn't. They don't become retroactively legal. They become legal after they are sworn in as the duly appointed electors for the State.

And if the results changed they would be ready to be sworn in. Not illegal. You people are really fucking dumb.

 

[Curried Goats]

Ok, show us the statues concerning so called “fake electors “

It's not a fake elector statute. It's a statute against fraudulently representing yourself as public or State official. It's the same law the criminalizes people pretending to be cops.

 

[Marener]

Ok, show us the statues concerning so called “fake electors “

 

[Curried Goats]

And if the results changed they would be ready to be sworn in. Not illegal. You people are really fucking dumb.

The point is they weren't sworn in when they purported to be the duly appointed electors. That's fraud.

 

[Lastamender]

The point is they weren't sworn in when they purported to be the duly appointed electors. That's fraud.

If they were not sworn in then they were not duly appointed. Were they ever sworn in? There is no crime here either.

 

[Curried Goats]

If they were not sworn in then they were not duly appointed. Were they ever sworn in? There is no crime here either.

That's what makes it fraud dummy. They weren't sworn in. They were fake electors, not electors in waiting but people who fraudulently signed their names to fake documents purporting themselves to be something they weren't.

 

[OldFlame]

What theory? Let's hear how that happens.

That's what I was asking, they can't articulate it.

More lawfare by the Bolsheviks. They have no issue abusing and bastardizing the judicial system to seize and keep power.

 

[Fort Fun Indiana]

That's what I was asking, they can't articulate it.

Lie.

Has been described to you more than once.

And get it through your thick skull... it's the "theory" the criminals invented.