what does the right want now?

[Truthmatters]

Your leaving because you can not defend this action.

There is NO DOUBT it happened.

Its a court document filed by the GOP.

The words speak for themselves.


The republican party wants corporations to run this country and NOT voters.

 

[Truthmatters]

how can you defend this?

 

[DiamondDave]

If those you accuse cannot defend corporation donations, then you in turn cannot defend union donations... you speak out against one, you speak out against the other.. or else you are indeed the lying hypocrite we always thought you have been

 

[Truthmatters]

One is legal, and one is not

 

[Truthmatters]

Why were corporate donations made illegal?

Do you even know the history?

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

Name a lie I have spread?

I havent lied about anything

that makes you the liar

That you don't lie is a great example of lies you spread...

 

[Soggy in NOLA]

One is legal, and one is not

You're so full of shit the stench is emanating from my CAT6 cable.

 

[Truthmatters]

Those are facts my friend

 

[Truthmatters]

Why were corporate donations made illegal?

Do you even know the history?

can you answer this?

 

[Baruch Menachem]

Damn leagalise is boring.

Statement of interest notes that they are filing a brief in favor of a democrat getting a corporate donation.

Their argument is that the government is forbidden under the terms of the first amendment from interfering in the first amendment rights of people speaking as part of a group. When you restrict the rights of folks to express their opinion through any means at their disposal, you are chilling free speech in its entirety.

You have an issue with corporations speaking their mind. I have a problem with confused little old ladies with cute doggies speaking theirs.

Free speech is free speech no matter who.

 

[Truthmatters]

Sure they were just trying to protect a democratic Donor.


Your insane

 

[Truthmatters]

Summary of the Argument


In Citizens United V The Federal Elecction Commision, 130 S.Ct. 876,904 (2010), the Supreme Court stated "f the first Amendment has any force, it prohibits Congreess from fining or jailing citizens, or associations of citizens for simply enguaging in political speech." Yet that is precisely what is happening in this case. The Defendants- Appellees face imprisonment under count 4 of the indictment simply for seeking to enguage in political speech through the Corporate form.


This is on page 2

http://images.politico.com/global/2012/01/rncamicus.pdf

 

[Truthmatters]

what do you think the founders would say?

 

[Truthmatters]

note they cant even find a way to deny these facts anymore

 

[Truthmatters]

Republican National Committee: Helping Democrats in Need - Law Blog - WSJ

 

[bigrebnc1775]

Name a lie I have spread?

I havent lied about anything

that makes you the liar

How about stop spreading misinformation as fact. You may not see it as a lie but when you have been repeatably told and shown your opinion was misinformed it becomes a lie.

 

[Claudette]

TDM Your a moron. Jeeze.

 

[Yurt]

the republican party is asking for coporate donations to be able to be given directly to the party and or candidate.

they wnat to make that legal

TM Reading Comprehension Skill Level: Zero.

The RNC is filing a brief in support of Democrat Donors.

Go back, read the decisions and appeals related to the case, then read the RNC brief.

Then come back here and edit your posts as necessary if you learned anything. (which I doubt you will)

i pointed this out on another board and she is ignoring it...apparently here too

 

[Truthmatters]

liar.

I did not ignore it on either site

 

[Yurt]

Your leaving because you can not defend this action.

There is NO DOUBT it happened.

Its a court document filed by the GOP.

The words speak for themselves.


The republican party wants corporations to run this country and NOT voters.

why won't you address the democratic briefs? why is it you ignore their arguments which are virtually identical?