Follow along with the video below to see how to install our site as a web app on your home screen.
Note: This feature currently requires accessing the site using the built-in Safari browser.
I've already articulated it. Stupid criminals are still criminals.That's what I was asking, they can't articulate it.
More lawfare by the Bolsheviks. They have no issue abusing and bastardizing the judicial system to seize and keep power.
Lie.
Has been described to you more than once.
And get it through your thick skull... it's the "theory" the criminals invented.
Too late.One more time. If the election went back to the state legislature and it changed the results those electors would be legal. They need to be there when an election is challenged. The winners electors do the voting. The others do nothing. They are of no harm to anyone.
Then why did you lie?I know what it is. You have nothing of value to offer, as usual.
Could Eastman do it without the State legislature? The answer is no. No crime was committed, those people were exercising their rights. That is all.Too late.
The electors can't be changed after the safe harbor date. See Bush v Gore.
As for your claim that they were "no harm", the Eastman memos blow that assertion up since the plan was to use them to deprive several states of their duly elected votes.
Then why did you lie?
Oh yeah. That's what sealions do. They can't even help it.
And I answered your question. If I have nothing to offer, that is just saying your question was worthless and in bad faith.
Nice work.
The Eastman memo says yes.Could Eastman do it without the State legislature? The answer is no. No crime was committed, those people were exercising their rights. That is all.
Does Eastman make the laws now? They defrauded no one.The Eastman memo says yes.
There is no constitutional right to defraud the government and overturn an election.
No, Eastman breaks the laws and his memo details how.Does Eastman make the laws now? They defrauded no one.
They were duly appointed by the people who picked them. They needed their candidate to be declared the winner. That did not happen. There is no crime.No, Eastman breaks the laws and his memo details how.
They attempted to defraud the government by claiming they were the duly appointed electors. They weren't.
Since their candidate wasn't declared the winner, they weren't duly appointed.They were duly appointed by the people who picked them. They needed their candidate to be declared the winner. That did not happen. There is no crime.
Were they in DC at the certification?Since their candidate wasn't declared the winner, they weren't duly appointed.
But they claimed to be and they attempted to use this false claim to get Trump in office. That's called fraud.
Nope. Electors don’t go to DC. The electors send their votes by mail, which is what the fake electors did.Were they in DC at the certification?
And did Congress confirm those votes? The answer is no because their candidate did not win. No crime here.Nope. Electors don’t go to DC. The electors send their votes by mail, which is what the fake electors did.
Naw and just because you're stupid, doesn't mean I have to listen to your garbage. You don't know the difference between repel and rappel but you think you're a legal scholar. LMFAO.Does that change my point?
Fraud is illegal whether it's successful or not.And did Congress confirm those votes? The answer is no because their candidate did not win. No crime here.
ALTERNATIVE
How so? Who are the victims?Fraud is illegal whether it's successful or not.
Not until they tried to pass themselves off as legitimate electors.ALTERNATIVE
adjective
1. (of one or more things) available as another possibility or choice
Example: the various alternative methods for resolving disputes
Probably in the post from you I quoted back to you and called a lie.Where did I lie?
